Transcending the "Obnoxious Spectator": A case for processual pluralism in ethnoarchaeology

Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 389-410

  Cunningham, Jerimy J ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Analogical reasoning; Causal process; Ethnoarchaeology; Pluralism; Universals

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345448057     PISSN: 02784165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-4165(03)00042-4     Document Type: Article

References (164)

1. Agorsah, E.K., 1990. Ethnoarchaeology: the search for a self-corrective approach to the study of past human behaviour. African Archaeological Review 8, 189-208.
2. Appadurai, A. (Ed.), 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Arnold, D.E., 1985. Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Arnold, D.E., 2000. Does the standardization of ceramic pastes really mean specialization? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7 (4), 333-375.
5. Arnold III, P.J., 2000. Working without a net: recent trends in ceramic ethnoarchaeology? Journal of Archaeological Research 8 (2), 105-133.
6. Ascher, R., 1961. Analogy in archaeological interpretation. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 17, 317-325.
7. Atherton, J.H., 1983. Ethnoarchaeology in Africa. African Archaeological Review 1, 75-104.
8. Baerreis, D.A., 1961. The ethnohistoric approach and archaeology. Ethnohistory 8, 49-77.
9. Biehl, P.F., 1999. Analogy and context - a re-construction of the missing link. In: Owen, L.R., Porr, M. (Eds.), Ethno-Analogy and the Reconstruction of Prehistoric Artifact Use and Production. Urgeschichtliche Materialhefte 14, Mo Vince Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 171-184.
10. Binford, L.R., 1962. Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity 28 (2), 217-225.
11. Binford, L.R., 1965. Archaeological systematics and the study of culture process. American Antiquity 31 (2), 203-210.
12. Binford, L.R., 1967. Smudge pits and hide smoking: the use of analogy in archaeological reasoning. American Antiquity 32, 1-12.
13. Binford, L.R., 1978. Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology. Academic Press, New York.
14. Binford, L.R., 1981. Bones: ancient men and modern myths. Academic Press, New York.
15. Binford, L.R., 1983. In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record. Academic Press, New York.
16. Binford, L.R., Sabloff, J.A., 1982. Paradigms, systematics, and archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research 38 (2), 137-153.
17. Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Bourdieu, P., 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, translated by R. Nice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Bourdieu, P., 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
20. Bowser, B., 2000. From pottery to politics: an ethnoarchaeological study of political factionalism, ethnicity and domestic pottery style in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7 (3), 219-248.
21. Carneiro, R.L., 1979. Tree felling with the stone ax: an experiment carried out among the Yanomamö Indians of Southern Venezuala. In: Kramer, C. (Ed.), Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 21-58.
22. Carr, C., Neitzel, J.E. (Eds.), 1995. Style, Society and Person: Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives. Plenum Press, New York.
23. Chang, K.C., 1967. Major aspects of the interrelationship of archaeology and ethnology. Current Anthropology 8, 227-243.
24. Charlton, T.H., 1981. Archaeology, ethnohistory and ethnology: interpretive interfaces. In: Schiffer, M.B. (Ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 4. Academic Press, New York, pp. 129-176.
25. Clifford, J., 1988. The predicament of culture: twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. Conkey, M.W., 1989. The place of material culture in contemporary anthropology. In: Hedlund, A.L. (Ed.), Perspectives on Anthropological Collections from the American Southwest: Proceedings of a Symposium. Anthropological Research Papers, No. 40. Arizona State University Press, Tucson, pp. 13-31.
27. Conkey, M.W., 1990. Experimenting with style in archaeology: some historical and theoretical issues. In: Conkey, M.W., Hastorf, C.A. (Eds.), The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 5-17.
28. Costin, C.L., 2000. The use of ethnoarchaeology for the archaeological study of ceramic production. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7 (4), 377-403.
29. Cunningham, J.J., 2001. Ceramic variation and ethnic holism: a case from the "Younge-early Ontario Iroquoian Border" in Southwestern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 25, 1-27.
30. Cunningham, J.J., 2003. Rethinking style in archaeology. In: VanPool, T.L., VanPool, C.S. (Eds.), Essential Tensions in Archaeological Method and Theory. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City (in press).
31. Cunningham, J.J., n.d. Essentializing culture: conceptual hurdles to pluralism in archaeology. In: Indigenous Peoples and Archaeology. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Chacmool Conference. The University of Calgary Press, Calgary (in press).
32. David, N., 1992. Integrating ethnoarchaeology: a subtle realist perspective. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 11, 330-359.
33. David, N., Hennig, H., 1972. The ethnography of pottery: a Fulani case seen in archaeological perspective. Addison-Wesley Module, Reading, MA, vol. 21.
34. David, N., Kramer, C., 2001. Ethnoarchaeology in Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. DeBoer, W.R., 1984. The last pottery show: system and sense in ceramic studies. In: van der Leeuw, S., Pritchard, A.C. (Eds.), The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, pp. 527-568.
36. DeBoer, W.R., 1991. The decorative burden: design, medium, and change. In: Longacre, W.A. (Ed.), Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 144-161.
37. Dillon, B., 1984. Ethnoarchaeology in middle America: an introduction. Journal of New World Archaeology 6 (2), 1-3.
38. Dunnell, R., 1978. Style and function: a fundamental dichotomy, American Antiquity 43, 192-202.
39. Dupré, J., 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
40. Ebert, J.I., 1979. An ethnoarchaeological approach to reassessing the meaning of variability in stone tool assemblages. In: Kramer, C. (Ed.), Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of ethnography for archaeology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 59-74.
41. Fenton, W.H., 1974. The advancement of material culture studies in modern anthropological research. In: Richardson, M. (Ed.), The Human Mirror: Material and Spatial Images of Man. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge, pp. 15-36.
42. Gallay, A., 1992. A Propos de la céramique actuelle du delta intérieur du Niger (Mali), approach ethnoarchéologique et règles transculturelles. In: Audouze, F. (Ed.), Ethnoarchéologie: Justification, Problèmes, Limites. Internationales d'Archéologie et d'Histoire d'Antibe 12. Editions APDCA, Juan-les-Pines, pp. 67-89.
43. Gallay, A., Audouze, F., Roux, V., 1992. Questions pour un colloque. In: Audouze, F. (Ed.), Ethnoarchéologie: Justification, Problèmes, Limites. Internationales d'Archéologie et d'Histoire d'Antibe 12. Editions APDCA, Juan-les-Pines, pp. 13-14.
44. Gallay, A., Huysecom, E., 1989. Ethnoarchéologie africaine: Un programme d'étude de la céramique récente du Delta Interieur du Niger. Document du Departement d'Anthropologie et d'Ecologie 14, Université de Genèva, Geneva.
45. Geertz, C., 1973. The Interpretation of Culture: Selected Essays. Basic Books, New York.
46. Gelbert, A., 1999. Technological and stylistic borrowings between ceramic traditions: a case study from Northeastern Senegal. In: Owen, L.R., Porr, M. (Eds.), Ethno-Analogy and the Reconstruction of Prehistoric Artifact Use and Production. Urgeschichtliche Materialhefte 14, Mo Vince Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 207-224.
47. Gifford, D.P., 1978. Ethnoarchaeological observations of natural processes affecting cultural materials. In: Gould, R.A. (Ed.), Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 77-102.
48. Goodyear, A.C., 1977. Review of Behavioral Archaeology. American Antiquity 42, 668-671.
49. Gordon, R., 1992. The Bushman Myth: The Making of a Namibian Underclass. Westview Press, Boulder.
50. Gorecki, P., 1985. Ethnoarchaeology: the need for a postmortem enquiry. World Archaeology 17 (2), 175-191.
51. Gosselain, O.P., 1994. Skimming through potters' agendas: an ethnoarchaeological study of clay selection strategies in Cameroon. In: Childs, S.T. (Ed.), Society, Culture, and Technology in Africa, MASCA Research Papers in Science and Archaeology, Supplement to vol. 11. University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, Philadelphia, pp. 99-107.
52. Gosselain, O.P., 2000. Materializing identities: an African perspective. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7 (3), 187-217.
53. Gould, R.A., 1971. The archaeologist as ethnographer: a case from the Western Desert of Australia. World Archaeology 2, 143-177.
54. Gould, R.A., 1974. Some current problems in ethnoarchaeology. In: Donnan, C.B.Clewlow Jr., C.W. (Eds.), Ethnoarchaeology. Monograph IV, Archaeological Survey, Institute of Archaeology. University of California, Los Angeles, pp. 29-48.
55. Gould, R.A., 1978a. From Tasmania to Tuscon: new directions in ethnoarchaeology. In: Gould, R.A. (Ed.), Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 1-10.
56. Gould, R.A., 1978b. Beyond analogy in ethnoarchaeology. In: Gould, R.A. (Ed.), Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 249-293.
57. Gould, R.A., 1980. Living Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
58. Gould, R.A., Watson, P.J., 1982. A dialogue on the meaning and use of analogy in ethnoarchaeological reasoning. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1, 355-381.
59. Graves, M.W., 1981. Ethnoarchaeology of Kalinga ceramic design. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, The University of Arizona, Tuscon.
60. Graves, M.W., 1985. Ceramic design variation within a Kalinga village: temporal and spatial process. In: Nelson, B. (Ed.), Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp. 9-34.
61. Graves, M.W., 1991. Pottery production and distribution among the Kalinga: a study of household and regional organization and differentiation. In: Longacre, W.A. (Ed.), Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 112-143.
62. Greenberg, L.J., 1975. Art as a structural system: a study of Hopi pottery designs. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication 2, 33-50.
63. Gross, P.R., Levitt, N., 1994. Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
64. Hardin, M.A., 1979. The cognitive basis of productivity in a decorative art style: implications of an ethnographic study for archaeologists' taxonomies. In: Kramer, C. (Ed.), Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 75-101.
65. Hardin, M.A., 1983. Applying linguistic models to the decorative arts: a preliminary consideration of the limits of analogy. Semiotica 46, 309-322.
66. Hardin, M.A., 1984. Models of decoration. In: van der Leeuw, S.E., Pritchard, A.C. (Eds.), The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, pp. 573-607.
67. Hayden, B. (Ed.), 1977. Lithic Use-Wear Analysis. Academic Press, New York.
68. Hegmon, M., 2003. Setting theoretical egos aside: issues and theory in North American archaeology. American Antiquity 68 (2), 213-243.
69. Hodder, I., 1982a. Symbols in Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
70. Hodder, I., 1982b. Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view. In: Hodder, I. (Ed.), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1-16.
71. Hodder, I., 1985. Postprocessual archaeology. In: Schiffer, M.B. (Ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 8. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1-26.
72. Hodder, I., 1986. From ethnoarchaeology to material culture studies. Dialoghi Di Archeologia 3 (1), 93-97.
73. Hodder, I., 1990a. The Domestication of Europe. Blackwell, Oxford.
74. Hodder, I., 1990b. Style as historic quality. In: Conkey, M.W., Hastorf, C.A. (Eds.), The Uses of Style in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 44-51.
75. Hodder, I., 1991. The decoration of containers: an ethnographic and historical study. In: Longacre, W.A. (Ed.), Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 71-94.
76. Hole, F., 1978. Pastoral nomadism in Western Iran. In: Gould, R.A. (Ed.), Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 127-167.
77. Hurt, T.D., Rakita, G.F.M. (Eds.), 2001. Style and Function: Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Archaeology. Bergin & Garvey, Westport.
78. Huysecom, E., 1992. Vers un Ethnoarchéologie Appliquée: Examples Africains. In: Audouze, F. (Ed.), Ethnoarchéologie: Justification, Problèmes, Limites. Internationales d'Archéologie et d'Histoire d'Antibe 12. Editions APDCA, Juan-les-Pines, pp. 91-102.
79. Jarker, R., Mahar, C., Wilkes, C. (Eds.), 1990. An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu: The Practice of Theory. St. Martin's Press, New York.
80. Keeley, L., 1980. Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
81. Kehoe, T.F., 1999. The development of the direct ethnological approach studies of archaeology in the northwestern plains of North America: the case of medicine wheels, tipi rings and boulder effigies. In: Owen, L.R., Porr, M. (Eds.), Ethno-Analogy and the Reconstruction of Prehistoric Artifact Use and Production. Urgeschichtliche Materialhefte 14, Mo Vince Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 255-273.
82. Kepecs, S., 1997. Introduction to New Approaches to Combining the Archaeological and Historical Records. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 4 (3/4), 193-198.
83. Kirch, P.V., 1978. Ethnoarchaeology and the study of agricultural adaptation in the humid tropics. In: Gould, R.A. (Ed.), Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 103-126.
84. Kleindienst, M.R., Watson, P.J., 1956. 'Action archaeology': the archaeological inventory of a living community. Anthropology Tomorrow 5, 75-78.
85. Kosso, P., 1991. Method in archaeology: middle-range theory as hermeneutics. American Antiquity 56, 621-627.
86. Kramer, C., 1979. Introduction. In: Kramer, C. (Ed.), Ethnoarchaeology: implications of ethnography for archaeology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 1-20.
87. Kramer, C., 1992. Ceramics in Rajasthan: distribution and scalar variation. In: Audouze, F. (Ed.), Ethnoarchéologie: Justification, Problèmes, Limites. Internationales d'Archéologie et d'Histoire d'Antibe 12. Editions APDCA, Juan-les-Pines, pp. 127-133.
88. Krause, R.A., 1985. The Clay Sleeps: An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Three African Potters. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
89. Kus, S., 1997. Archaeologists and anthropologists: much ado about something after all? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 4 (3/4), 199-213.
90. LaViolette, A., 1995. Women craft specialists in Jenne: the manipulation of Mande social categories. In: Conrad, D.C., Frank, B.E. (Eds.), Status and Identity in West Africa: Nyamakalaw of Mande. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 170-181.
91. Lees, S.H., 1979. Ethnoarchaeology and the interpretation of community organization. In: Kramer, C. (Ed.), Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of ethnography for archaeology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 265-276.
92. Lemonnier, P., 1986. The study of material culture today: toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5, 147-186.
93. Lemonnier, P., 1992. Elements for an anthropology of technology. Anthropological Papers of the Museum of Anthropology 88, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
94. Lévi-Strauss, C., 1962. The Savage Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
95. Longacre, W.A., 1978. Ethnoarchaeology. Reviews in Anthropology 5, 357-363.
96. Longacre, W.A., 1985. Pottery use-life among the Kalinga, Northern Luzon, the Philippines. In: Nelson, B. (Ed.), Decoding Prehistoric Ceramics. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp. 335-345.
97. Longacre, W.A., 1991a. Ceramic ethnoarchaeology: an introduction. In: Longacre, W.A. (Ed.), Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 1-10.
98. Longacre, W.A., 1991b. Sources of ceramic variability among the Kalinga of Northern Luzon. In: Longacre, W.A. (Ed.), Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 95-111.
99. Longino, H.E., 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
100. MacEachern, S., 1996. Foreign countries: the development of ethnoarchaeology in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of World Prehistory 10, 243-304.
101. Mayor, A., 1994. Durée de vie des céramiques africaines: facteurs responsables et implications archéologiques. In: Terre cuite et société: la céramique, document technique, économique, culturel. Rencontres int. jd'archéol. Et d'hist., 14. Editions APDCA, Juan-les-Pines, pp. 31-44.
102. Miller, D., 1983. Things ain't what they used to be. Royal Anthropological Institute Newsletter 59, 5-7.
103. Miller, D., 1985. Artifacts as categories: a study of ceramic variability in Central India. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
104. Muntoni, I.M., 1999. From ceramic production to vessel use: a multi-level approach to the neolithic communities of the tavoliere Southern Italy. In: Owen, L.R., Porr, M. (Eds.), Ethno-Analogy and the Reconstruction of Prehistoric Artifact Use and Production. Urgeschichtliche Materialhefte 14, Mo Vince Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 237-254.
105. O'Connell, J.F., 1995. Ethnoarchaeology Needs a General Theory of Behavior. Journal of Archaeological Research 3 (3), 205-255.
106. Odell, G., Odell-Vereecken, F., 1980. Verifying the reliability of lithic use-wear assessments by 'blind tests': the low-power approach. Journal of Field Archaeology 7, 87-120.
107. Orme, B., 1981. Anthropology for Archaeologists: an introduction. Cornell University Press, Ithica.
108. Ortner, S.B., 1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26, 126-166.
109. Owen, L.R., Porr, M. (Eds.), 1999a. Ethno-Analogy and the Reconstruction of Prehistoric Artifact Use and Production. Urgeschichtliche Materialhefte 14. Mo Vince Verlag, Tübingen.
110. Owen, L.R., Porr, M., 1999b. Ethno-analogy in theory and practice: an introduction. In: Owen, L.R., Porr, M. (Eds.), Ethno-Analogy and the Reconstruction of Prehistoric Artifact Use and Production. Urgeschichtliche Materialhefte 14, Mo Vince Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 1-2.
111. Papousek, D.A., 1984. Pots and people in Los Pueblos: the social and economic organization of pottery. In: van der Leeuw, S.E., Pritchard, A.C. (Eds.), The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, pp. 475-520.
112. Pastron, A.G., 1974. Preliminary ethnoarchaeological investigations among the tarahumara. In: Donnan, C.B., Clewlow, C.W. (Eds.), Ethnoarchaeology. Monograph IV, Archaeological Survey, Institute of Archaeology. University of California, Los Angeles, pp. 93-114.
113. Porr, M., 1999. Archaeology, analogy, material culture, society: an exploration. In: Owen, L.R., Porr, M. (Eds.), Ethno-Analogy and the Reconstruction of Prehistoric Artifact Use and Production. Urgeschichtliche Materialhefte 14, Mo Vince Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 3-15.
114. Price, B.J., 1982. Cultural materialism: a theoretical review. American Antiquity 47, 709-741.
115. Pritchard, A.C., van der Leeuw, S.E., 1984. Introduction: the many dimensions of pottery. In: van der Leeuw, S.E., Pritchard, A.C. (Eds.), The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, pp. 1-23.
116. Raab, L.M., Goodyear, A.C., 1984. Middle-range theory in archaeology: a critical analysis of origins and applications. American Antiquity 49, 255-268.
117. Rathje, W.L., 1978. Archaeological ethnography... because sometimes it is better to give than to receive. In: Gould, R.A. (Ed.), Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 49-78.
118. Riley, J.A., 1984. Pottery analysis and the reconstruction of ancient exchange systems. In: van der Leeuw, S.E., Pritchard, A.C. (Eds.), The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, pp. 55-73.
119. Roux, V., 1999. Ethnoarchaeology and the generation of referential models: the case of Harappan Carnelian beads. In: Owen, L.R., Porr, M. (Eds.), Ethno-Analogy and the Reconstruction of Prehistoric Artifact Use and Production. Urgeschichtliche Materialhefte 14, Mo Vince Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 153-169.
120. Sackett, J.R., 1977. The meaning of style in archaeology: a general model. American Antiquity 42 (3), 369-380.
121. Saitta, D.J., 1992. Radical archaeology and middle-range methodology. Antiquity 66, 886-897.
122. Schiffer, M.B., 1976. Behavioral Archaeology. Academic Press, New York.
123. Schiffer, M.B., 1978. Methodological issues in ethnoarchaeology. In: Gould, R.A. (Ed.), Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 229-247.
124. Schiffer, M.B., 1994. Review of "Elements for an Anthropology of Technology". American Anthropologist 96, 202-204.
125. Schiffer, M.B., Skibo, J.M., 1997. The explanation of artifact variability. American Antiquity 62, 27-55.
126. Shanks, M., Tilley, C., 1982. Ideology, symbolic power, and ritual communication: a reinterpretation of Neolithic mortuary practices. In: Hodder, I. (Ed.), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 129-154.
127. Shanks, M., Tilley, C., 1987. Social Theory and Archaeology. Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.
128. Shanks, M., Tilley, C., 1992. [1987] Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, second ed. Routledge, London.
129. Simms, S.R., 1992. Ethnoarchaeology: obnoxious spectator, trivial pursuit, or the keys to a time machine? In: L. Wandsnider (Ed.), Quandaries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology's Future. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper No. 20, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 186-198.
130. Skibo, J.M., Schiffer, M.B., Kowalski, N., 1989. Ceramic style analysis in archaeology and ethnoarchaeology: bridging the analytical gap. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8, 388-409.
131. Stahl, A.B., 1993. Concepts of time and approaches to analogical reasoning in historical perspective. American Antiquity 58, 235-260.
132. Stanislawski, M.B., 1974. The relationships of ethnoarchaeology, traditional and systems archaeology. In: Donnan, C.B.Clewlow Jr., C.W. (Eds.), Ethnoarchaeology. Monograph IV, Archaeological Survey, Institute of Archaeology. University of California, Los Angeles, pp. 15-26.
133. Stanislawski, M.B., 1978. If pots were mortal. In: Gould, R.A. (Ed.), Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 201-227.
134. Stark, M.T., 1993. Refitting the "cracked and broken façade": the case for empiricism in post-processual ethnoarchaeology. In: Yoffee, N., Sherratt, A. (Eds.), Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 93-104.
135. Stern, D.G., 2003. The practical turn. In: Turner, S.P., Roth, P.A. (Eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 185-206.
136. Steward, J.H., 1942. The direct historical approach to archaeology. American Antiquity 7, 337-343.
137. Sullivan, A.P., 1978. Inference and evidence in archaeology: a discussion of the conceptual problems. In: Schiffer, M.B. (Ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp. 183-222.
138. Tani, M., Longacre, W.A., 1999. On methods of measuring ceramic uselife: a revision of the uselife estimates of cooking vessels among the Kalinga, Philippines. American Antiquity 64, 299-308.
139. Thompson, R.H., 1991. The archaeological purpose of ethnoarchaeology. In: Longacre, W.A. (Ed.), Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 231-245.
140. Trigger, B.G., 1978. Ethnoarchaeology: some cautionary considerations. In: Tooker, E. (Ed.), Ethnology By Archaeologists. American Ethnological Society, Washington, DC, pp. 1-9.
141. Trigger, B.G., 1989. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
142. Trigger, B.G., 1995. Expanding middle-range theory. Antiquity 69, 449-458.
143. Trigger, B.G., 1998. Archaeology and epistemology: dialoguing across the Darwinian chasm. American Journal of Archaeology 102, 1-34.
144. Tringham, R.E., 1978. Experimentation, ethnoarchaeology, and the leapfrogs in archaeological methodology. In: Gould, R.A. (Ed.), Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, pp. 169-200.
145. Tringham, R., Cooper, G., Odell, G., Voytek, B., Whitman, A., 1974. Experimentation in the formation of edge damage: a new approach to lithic analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology 1, 171-196.
146. Tschauner, H., 1994. Archaeological systematics and cultural evolution: retrieving the honour of culture history. Man 29, 77-93.
147. Tschauner, H., 1996. Middle-range theory, behavioural archaeology, and postempiricist philosophy of science in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 3, 1-30.
148. van der Leeuw, S.E., 1984. Dust to dust: a transformational view of the ceramic cycle. In: van der Leeuw, S.E., Pritchard, A.C. (Eds.), The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, pp. 707-773.
149. van der Leeuw, S.E., Pritchard, A.C. (Eds.), 1984. The Many Dimensions of Pottery: Ceramics in Archaeology and Anthropology. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
150. van-der-Leeuw, S.E., Papousek, D.A., 1992. Tradition and Innovation. In: Audouze, F. (Ed.), Ethnoarchéologie: Justification, Problèmes, Limites. Internationales d'Archéologie et d'Histoire d'Antibe 12. Editions APDCA, Juan-les-Pines, pp. 135-158.
151. VanPool, C.S., VanPool, T.L., 1999. The scientific nature of postprocessualism. American Antiquity 64 (1), 33-53.
152. Vidale, M., Kenoyer, J.M., Bhan, K.K., 1992. A discussion of the concept of ≪chaîne opératoire≫ in the study of stratified societies: evidence from ethnoarchaeology and archaeology. In: Audouze, F., Ethnoarchéologie: Justification, Problèmes, Limites. Internationales d'Archéologie et d'Histoire d'Antibe 12. Editions APDCA, Juan-les-Pines, pp. 181-194.
153. Wallaert-Pêtre, H., 1999. Manual laterality apprenticiship as the first learning prescribed to potters. In: Owen, L.R., Porr, M. (Eds.), Ethno-Analogy and the Reconstruction of Prehistoric Artifact Use and Production. Urgeschichtliche Materialhefte 14, Mo Vince Verlag, Tübingen, pp. 185-206.
154. Watson, P.J., 1979. The idea of ethnoarchaeology: notes and comments. In: Kramer, C. (Ed.), Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of ethnography for archaeology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 277-287.
155. Watson, P.J., 1980. The theory and practice of ethnoarchaeology with special reference to the Near East. Paleorient 6, 55-64.
156. Watson, P.J., 1982. Review of Living Archaeology. American Antiquity 47, 445-448.
157. Wiessner, P., 1983. Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity 49, 253-276.
158. Wilmsen, E., 1989. Land filled with flies: a political economy of the Kalahari. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
159. Wylie, A., 1982. An analogy by any other name is just as analogical: a commentary on the Gould-Watson dialogue. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1, 382-401.
160. Wylie, A., 1985. The reaction against analogy. In: Schiffer, M.B. (Ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 8. Academic Press, New York, pp. 63-111.
161. Wylie, A., 1988. 'Simply' analogy and the role of relevant assumptions: implications of archaeological practice. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2 (2), 134-150.
162. Wylie, A., 1992. The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests: recent archaeological research on gender. American Antiquity 57 (1), 15-35.
163. Wylie, A., 1995. [1989] The interpretive dilemma. In: Pinsky, V., Wylie, A. (Eds.), Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology: Essays in the Philosophy, History, and Socio-Politics of Archaeology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 18-27.
164. Wylie, A., 2000. Questions of evidence, legitimacy, and the (dis)unity of science. American Antiquity 65 (2), 227-237.