The growth-equity trade-off in modern economic development: The case of Thailand

Journal of Asian Economics

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 735-757

  Krongkaew, Medhi ^a   Kakwani, Nanak ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION   (Thailand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Growth; Income distribution; Thailand

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345412652     PISSN: 10490078     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2003.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Charoemtiarana, T. (1979). Thailand: The politics of despotic paternalism. Bangkok: Thammasat University Press.
2. Chu, Y.P., & Hill, H. (Eds.). (2001). Social impact of the Asian financial crisis. New York: Edward Elgar.
3. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2000). Growth is good for the poor. Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
4. Kakwani N. Growth and poverty reduction: An empirical analysis Asian Development Review 182 2000 74-84
5. Kakwani, N. (2002). Comment on the growth-poverty connection by Surjit Bhalla. Mimeographed.
6. Kakwani N. Pernia E. What is pro-poor growth? Asian Development Review 181 2000 1-16
7. Kakwani, N., & Son, H. (2002). Pro-poor growth and poverty reduction: The Asian experience, background paper written for "The state of progress towards the achievements of the millennium development goals in Asia and the Pacific region". Bangkok: The Poverty Centre, Office of the Executive Secretary, ESCAP.
8. Krongkaew, M. (1995). Contribution of agriculture to industrialisation. In M. Krongkaew (Ed.), Thailand's industrialisation and its consequences (Chap. 2, pp. 33-65). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan.
9. Krongkaew, M. (1996). Changes in poverty and income inequality in Thailand, 1962/1963 to 1992. In Economic growth, poverty and income inequality in the Asia-Pacific Region Project. Working Paper Series-WP1/96. School of Economics, University of New South Wales and Faculty of Economics and Thammasat University, Bangkok.
10. Krongkaew, M. (1998). An alternative interpretation of economic policy determination in Thailand: An important interplay of bureaucracy, political power and private business. In T. Kazuo (Ed.), Asia's development experiences: How internationally competitive national manufacturing firms have developed in Asia (pp. 311-371). Tokyo: Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development (FASID).
11. Krongkaew M. Tinakorn P. Suphachalasai S. Rural poverty in Thailand: Policy issues and responses Asian Development Review 101 1992 199-225
12. Muscat, R. J. (1966). Development strategy in Thailand. New York: Praeger.
13. Muscat, R. J. (1990). Thailand and the United States: Development, security, and foreign aid. New York: Columbia University Press.
14. National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB). (various years). National Economic and Social Development Plans. Bangkok: NESDB.
15. National Statistical Office (NSO). (various years). Socio-Economic Surveys (SES). Bangkok: NSO.
16. Okun, A. (1975). Efficiency and equity: The big tradeoff. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17. Tinakorn P. Income inequalities during four decades of national development: 1961-2001 Thammasat Economic Journal 202/3 2002, June-September 141-208
18. Siamwalla, A., & Setboonsarng, S. (1989). Trade, exchange rate, and agricultural pricing policies in Thailand. The political economy of agricultural pricing policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
19. Siamwalla, A. (forthcoming). The anatomy of the Thai crisis. In P. G. Warr (Ed.), Thailand beyond the crisis. London: Routledge.
20. World Bank. (1959). A public development program for Thailand. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.