Phenotypic differences among ploidy levels of Phragmites australis growing in Romania

Aquatic Botany

Volumn 64, Issue 3-4, 1999, Pages 223-234

  Paucã Comãnescu, Mihaela ^a   Clevering, Olga A ^b   Hanganu, Jenicã ^c   Gridin, Mihai ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY   (Romania)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY NIOO KNAW   (Netherlands)

^c Danube Delta Institute   (ROM)

Author keywords

Danube Delta; Environmental stress; Phragmites australis; Plant morphology; Salinity; Water depth

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; GROWTH RATE; MORPHOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT; PLANT LEAF; PLOIDY; ROMANIA; STRAIN DIFFERENCE;

EMBRYOPHYTA; PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS; POACEAE;

EID: 0345410958     PISSN: 03043770     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3770(99)00052-2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Björk S. Ecological investigations of Phragmites communis: Studies in theoretic and applied limnology. Folia Limn. Scand. 14:1967;1-248.
2. Djebrouni M. Morphological, karyological and enzymatic variability among some populations of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud, karyological and enzymatic variability among some populations of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 27:1992;49-59.
3. Dykyjová D., Pazourková Z. A.diploid form of Phragmites communis, as a possible result of cytogenetical response to ecological stress. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 14:1979;113-120.
4. Dykyjová, D., Květ, J., 1978. Pond Littoral Ecosystems. Springer, Berlin.
5. Gorenflot R. Degrés et niveaux de la variation du nombre chromosomique chez Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud, Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH. Stiftung Rübel Zürich. 87:1986;53-65.
6. Gorenflot, R., Raicu, P., Cartier, D., Ciobanu, I., Stoian, V., Staicu, S., 1972. Le complexe polyploïde du Phragmites communis Trin, C.R. Acad. Sc. 274, Série D, 1501-1504.
7. Guthruf K., Zenger C., Brändle R. The habitat dependent productivity of reed (Phragmites australis) and its significance. Lim. aktuell. 5:1993;1-7.
8. Haslam S.M. The performance of Phragmites communis Trin. in relation to water-supply. Ann. Bot. 34:1970;867-877.
9. Hroudová Z., Zákravský P. Ecology of two cytotypes of Butomus umbellatus II. Reproduction, growth, growth and biomass production. Folia. Geobot. Phytotax. 28:1993;413-424.
10. Lenoir, A., Stoian, V., Cartier, D., Gorenflot, R., Raicu, P., Lucien, M., 1975. Polyploïdie et méiose du Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud, C.R. Acad. Sc. 280, Série D, 621-624.
11. Pazourková Z. Caryology of some forms of Phragmites communis Trin. PT-PP/IBP Report. 3:1973;59-62.
12. Petit C., Thompson J.D. Variation in phenotypic response to light availability between diploid and tetraploid populations of the perennial grass Arrhenatherum elatius from open and woodland sites. J. Ecol. 85:1997;657-667.
13. Raicu P., Staicu S., Stoian V., Roman T. The Phragmites communis Trin., Chromosome complement in the Danube Delta. Hydrobiol. 39:1972;83-89.
14. Rudescu, L., Niculescu, C., Chivu, I.P., 1965. Monografia stufului din Delta Dunårii, Ed Acad., Bucuresti.
15. SAS Institute, 1990. SAS/STAT User's Guide, SAS Institute. Cary, NC.
16. Stebbins, G.L., 1971. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. Edward Arnhold, London.