A Detailed Analysis of Task Performance with and without Computer Monitoring

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 345-366

  Stanton, Jeffrey M ^b   Sarkar Barney, Shreya T M ^a  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; STATISTICAL METHODS; WEB BROWSERS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ELECTRONIC SUPERVISORS;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 0345377757     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1602_11     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aiello, J. R., & Kolb, K. J. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 339-353.
2. Aiello, J. R., & Svec, C. M. (1993). Computer monitoring of work performance: Extending the social facilitation framework to electronic presence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 537-548.
3. Amick, B. C., & Smith, M. J. (1992). Stress, computer-based work monitoring and measurement systems: A conceptual overview. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 6-16.
4. Attewell, P. (1987). Big brother and the sweatshop: Computer surveillance in the automated office. Sociological Theory, 5, 87-99.
5. Avero, P., & Calvo, M. G. (1999). Emotional reactivity to social-evaluative stress: Gender differences in response systems concordance. Personality & Individual Differences, 27, 155-170.
6. Baron, R. S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 1-40.
7. Beidel, D. C., Turner, S. M., & Dancu, C. V. (1985). Physiological, cognitive and behavioral aspects of social anxiety. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 23, 109-117.
8. Bell, P. A., & Yee, L. A. (1989). Skill level and audience effects on performance of a karate drill. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 191-200.
9. Bond, C. F. (1982). Social facilitation: A self-presentation view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1042-1050.
10. Bond, C. F., Atoum, A. O., & VanLeeuwen, M. D. (1996). Social impairment of complex learning in the wake of public embarrassment. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 18, 31-44.
11. Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265-292.
12. Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (Rev. ed.). San Francisco: Holden-Day.
13. Brewer, N. (1995). The effects of monitoring individual and group performance on the distribution of effort across tasks. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 760-777.
14. Brewer, N., & Ridgway, T. (1998). Effects of supervisory monitoring on productivity and quality of performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 211-227.
15. Burns, J. W. (1995). Interactive effects of traits, states, and gender on cardiovascular reactivity during different situations. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 279-303.
16. Chalykoff, J., & Kochan, T. A. (1989). Computer-aided monitoring: Its influence on employee job satisfaction and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 42, 807-829.
17. Cohen, J. L. (1979). Social facilitation: Increased evaluation apprehension through permanency of record. Motivation and Emotion, 3, 19-33.
18. Cohen, J. L. (1980). Social facilitation: Audience versus evaluation apprehension effects. Motivation and Emotion, 4, 21-34.
19. Cottrell, N. B. (1972). Social facilitation. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 185-236). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
20. Criddle, W. D. (1971). The physical presence of other individuals as a factor in social facilitation. Psychonomic Science, 22, 229-230.
21. DeTienne, K. B. (1993). Big brother or friendly coach? Computer monitoring in the 21st century. The Futurist, 27, 33-37.
22. DiTecco, D., Cwitco, G., Arsenault, A., & Andre, M. (1992). Operator stress and monitoring practices. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 29-34.
23. Earn, B. M. (1982). Intrinsic motivation as a function of extrinsic financial rewards and subjects' locus of control. Journal of Personality, 50, 360-373.
24. Eckman, P. S., & Shean, G. D. (1997). Habituation of cognitive and physiological arousal and social anxiety. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 35, 1113-1121.
25. Galletta, D., & Grant, R. (1995). Silicon supervisors and stress: Merging new evidence from the field. Accounting Management and Information Technology, 5, 163-183.
26. Ganster, D. C., & Schaubroeck, J. (1991). Work and stress and employee health. Journal of Management, 17, 235-271.
27. Greene, R. W. (1998, September). Internet addiction: Is it just this month's hand-wringer for worry-warts, or a genuine problem? Computerworld, 32, 78-79.
28. Griffith, T. L. (1993). Monitoring and performance: A comparison of computer and supervisor monitoring. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 549-572.
29. Groves, R. M., Cialdini, R. B., & Couper, M. P. (1992). Understanding the decision to participate in a survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 475-495.
30. Hartley, T. R. (1995). A situated action approach to stress and cardiovascular reactivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
31. Hartley, T. R., Ginsburg, G. P., & Heffner, K. (1999). Self-preservation and cardiovascular reactivity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 32(1), 75-88.
32. Hatch, D. D., & Hall, J. E. (1997, August). Video surveillance presents HR challenges. Workforce, 76(8), 67.
33. Henderson, R., Mahar, D., Saliba, A., Deane, F., & Napier, R. (1998). Electronic monitoring systems: An examination of physiological activity and task performance within a simulated keystroke security and electronic performance monitoring system. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 48, 143-157.
34. Hom, H. L. (1987). A methodological note: Time of participation effects on intrinsic motivation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 210-215.
35. Julian, A. L., & Stanton, J. M. (1999, April). The impact of social cues about EPM on performance quality and quantity. In J. M. Stanton & L. M. Sulsky (Chairs), Big and little brothers: Recent findings on electronic performance monitoring. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial-Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.
36. Kidwell, R. E., & Bennett, N. (1994). Employee reactions to electronic control systems. Group and Organization Management, 19, 203-218.
37. Kraut, R., Dumais, S., & Koch, S. (1989). Computerization, productivity, and quality of work-life. Communications of the ACM, 32, 220-238.
38. Kustis, G. A., & Ekeberg, S. E. (1993, June). Short-term psychological effects of computer monitoring. Poster session presented at the Fifth Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Society, Chicago, IL.
39. Lazarus, R. S., & Launier, R. (1978). Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In L. A. Pervin & M. Lewis (Eds.), Perspectives in interactional psychology (pp. 287-327). New York: Plenum.
40. Levine, B. A., Gorman, S. B., & Sherry, G. S. (1978). Reinforcement expectancy effects on phobia research volunteers. Psychological Record, 28, 585-588.
41. MacCracken, M. J., & Stadulis, R. E. (1985). Social facilitation of young children's dynamic balance performance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 150-165.
42. McCleary, R., & Hay, R. A. (1980). Applied time series analysis for the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43. Munro, D. (1970). An inexpensive automatic material reward dispenser for use with children. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 23, 194.
44. Nebeker, D. M., & Tatum, B. C. (1993). The effects of computer monitoring, standards and rewards on work performance, job satisfaction, and stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 508-536.
45. Orthmann, R. (1998, December). Workplace computer monitoring rose in 1998. Employment Testing - Law & Policy Reporter, 7, p. 182.
46. Revelle, W., & Loftus, D. A. (1992). The implications of arousal effects for the study of affect and memory. In S.-A. Christianson (Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory (pp. 113-149). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
47. Schliefer, L. M., Galinsky, T. L., & Pan, C. S. (1995). Mood disturbance and musculoskeletal discomfort effects of electronic performance monitoring in a VDT data-entry task. In S. L. Sauter & L. R. Murphy (Eds.), Organizational risk factors for job stress (pp. 195-203). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48. Silverman, M. K., & Smith, C. S. (1995). The effects of human versus computer monitoring of performance on physiological reactions and perceptions of stress. In S. L. Sauter & L. R. Murphy (Eds.), Organizational risk factors for job stress (pp. 181-193). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
49. Sipior, J. C., & Ward, B. T. (1995). The ethical and legal quandary of email privacy. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 38(12), 8-54.
50. Sipior, J. C., Ward, B. T., & Rainone, S. M. (1998). Ethical management of employee e-mail privacy. Information Systems Management, 15, 41-47.
51. Smith, M. J., Carayon, P., Sanders, K. J., Lim, S. Y., & LeGrande, D. (1992). Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 17-28.
52. Stanton, J. M. (2000). Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review, and research directions. Human Performance, 13, 85-113.
53. Stanton, J. M., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (1996). Effects of computer monitoring on personal control, satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 738-745.
54. Westin, A. F. (1992). Two key factors that belong in a macroergonomic analysis of electronic monitoring: Employee perceptions of fairness and the climate of organizational trust or distrust. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 35-42.
55. Zajonc, R. B. (1965, July 16). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.