Housing opportunity, desegregation strategy, and policy research

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 201-206

  De Souza Briggs, Xavier ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345373012     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.10113     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Chen, H.-T (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Galster, G., & Killen, S.P. (1995). The geography of opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), 7-43.
3. Kingdon, J.W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
4. Massey, D.S., & Denton, N.A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
5. Pastor, M., Jr. (2000). Geography and opportunity. In Smelser, Wilson, & Mitchell (Eds.), America becoming: Racial trends and their consequences (Vol. 1, pp. 435-468). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Rubinowitz, L.S., & Rosenbaum, J.E. with Dvorin, S. (2000). Crossing the class and color lines: From public housing to white suburbia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Weiss, C.H. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In Connell, Kubisch, & Schorr (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 65-93). New York: Aspen Institute.
8. Wilson, W.J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago.