Water-retention characteristics and related physical properties of soil on afforested agricultural land in Finland

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 186, Issue 1-3, 2003, Pages 21-32

  Wall, A ^a   Heiskanen, J ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Air filled porosity; Bulk density; Particle size distribution; Plant available water; Soil aeration

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; LAND USE; POROSITY; SOILS;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; AGRICULTURAL SOILS;

ECOLOGY;

AFFORESTATION; AGRICULTURAL LAND; BULK DENSITY; PARTICLE SIZE; POROSITY; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER; SOIL WATER; WATER RETENTION;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 0345359847     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00239-1     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aaltonen, V.T., 1933. Über die postglazialen, natürlichen Veränderungen des Waldbodens in Finnland. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 18 (4), 1-22 (in German).
2. Aaltonen, V.T., 1941. Metsämaamme valtakunnan metsien toisen arvioinnin tulosten valossa. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 29 (5), 1-71 (in Finnish).
3. Aaltonen, V.T., 1947. Studien über die Bodenbildung in den Hainwäldern Finnlands mit einigen Beobachtungen über ausländische Braunerden. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 35 (1), 1-64 (in German).
4. Aaltonen, V.T., Aarnio, B., Hyyppä, E., Kaitera, P., Keso, L., Kivinen, E., Kokkonen, R, Kotilainen, M.J., Sauramo, M., Tuorila, R, Vuorinen, J., 1949. A critical review of soil terminology and soil classification in Finland in the year 1949. Maatal. tiet. aikak. 21, 36-66 (in Finnish with English summary).
5. Ahuja, L.R., Fiedler, F., Dunn, G.H., Benjamin, J.G., Garrison, A., 1998. Changes in soil water retention curves due to tillage and natural reconsolidation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62, 1228-1233.
6. Alriksson, A., Olsson, M.T., 1995. Soil changes in different age classes of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) on afforested farmland. Plant Soil 168-169, 103-110.
7. Archer, J.R., Smith, P.D., 1972. The relation between bulk density, available water capacity, and air capacity of soils. J. Soil Sci. 34 (4), 475-480.
8. Bauer, A., Black, A.L., 1992. Organic carbon effects on available water capacity on three soil textural groups. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 248-254.
9. Cajander, A.K., 1909. Über Waldtypen. Acta For. Fenn. 1 (in German).
10. Cajander, A.K., 1926. The theory of forest types. Acta For. Fenn. 29 (3), 1-108.
11. Cassel, D.K., 1983. Spatial and temporal variability of soil physical properties following tillage of Norfolk loamy sand. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47, 196-201.
12. De Jong, R., Loebel, K., 1982. Empirical relations between soil components and water retention at 1/3 and 15 atmospheres. Can. J. Soil Sci. 62, 343-350.
13. Domżalł, H., Hodara, J., Słowińska-Jurkiewicz, A., Turski, R., 1993. The effects of agricultural use on the structure and physical properties of three soil types. Soil Till. Res. 27, 365-382.
14. Elonen, P., 1971. Particle-size analysis of soil. Acta Agric. Fenn. 122.
15. FAO, 1988. FAO-UNESCO Soil Map of the World, Revised Legend. World Soil Resources Report 60. FAO, Rome.
16. Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry, 2000. Finnish Forest Research Institute, SVT. Agriculture, forest and fishery, 14.
17. Glinski, J., Stepniewski, W., 1985. Soil Aeration and its Role for Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
18. Gupta, S.C., Larson, W.E., 1979. Estimating soil water retention characteristics from particle size distribution, organic matter percent, and bulk density. Water Resour. Res. 15 (6), 1633-1635.
19. Heinonen, R., 1954. Moisture conditions in Finnish topsoils. Agrog. Publ. 62 (in Finnish with English summary).
20. Heiskanen, J., 1992. Comparison of three methods for determining the particle density of soil with liquid pycnometers. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 23, 841-846.
21. Heiskanen, J., 1993. Variation in water retention characteristics of peat growth media used in tree nurseries. Silva Fenn. 27, 77-97.
22. Hillel, D., 1982. Introduction to Soil Physics. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
23. Hollis, J.M., Jones, R.J.A., Palmer, R.C., 1977. The effects of organic matter and particle size on the water-retention properties of some soils in the west Midlands of England. Geoderma 17, 225-238.
24. Hudson, B., 1994. Soil organic matter and available water capacity. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49 (2), 189-194.
25. Hytönen, J., Ekola E., 1993. Soil nutrient regime and tree nutrition on afforested fields in central Ostrobothnia, western Finland. Folia For. 822 (in Finnish with English summary).
26. Ilvessalo, Y., 1933. Occurrence of forest site types on different soils. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 18 (5), 1-36 (in Finnish with English summary).
27. Kähäri, J., Mäntylahti, V., Rannikko, M., 1987. Soil fertility of Finnish cultivated soils in 1981-1985. Viljavuuspalvelu. Helsinki, (in Finnish with English summary).
28. Karlsson, A., Albrektson, A., Sonesson, J., 1997. Site index and productivity of artificially regenerated Betula pendula and Betula pubescens stands on former farmland in southern and central Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. 12, 256-263.
29. Kinnunen, K., Aro, L., 1996. Vanhojen pellonmetsitysten tila Lansi-Suomessa. Folia For. 1996 (2), 101-111 (in Finnish).
30. Kivisaari, S., 1971. Influence of texture on some soil moisture constants. Acta Agric. Fenn. 123, 217-222.
31. Kujala, V., 1979. Forest types of Finland. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 92 (8), 1-45 (in Finnish with English abstract).
32. Lindstrom, M.J., Onstad, C.A., 1984. Influence of tillage systems on soil physical parameters and infiltration after planting. J. Soil Water Conserv. 39, 149-152.
33. Littel, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W., Wolfinger, R.D., 1996. SAS® System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
34. Makeschin, F., 1994. Effects of energy forestry on soils. Biomass Bioenergy 6, 63-79.
35. Mann, L.K., 1986. Changes in soil carbon storage after cultivation. Soil Sci. 142, 279-288.
36. Manrique, L.A., Jones, C.A., Dyke, P.T., 1991. Predicting soil water retention characteristics from soil physical and chemical properties. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 22, 1847-1860.
37. Mapa, R.B., Green, R.E., Santo, L., 1986. Temporal variability of soil hydraulic properties with wetting and drying subsequent to tillage. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50, 1133-1138.
38. McKeague, J.A., Eilers, R.G., Thomasson, A.J., Reeve, M.J., Bouma, J., Grossman, R.B., Favrot, J.C., Renger, M., Strebel, O., 1984. Tentative assessment of soil survey approaches to the characterization and interpretation of air-water properties of soils. Geoderma 34, 69-100.
39. Messing, A., Alriksson, A., Johansson, W., 1997. Soil physical properties of afforested and arable land. Soil Use Manage. 13, 209-217.
40. Munsell® Soil Color Charts, 1990. Munsell Color, Macbeth®, Edition Revised. Division of Kollmorgen Instruments Corporation, Newburgh, New York.
41. Onstad, C.A., Wolfe, J.L., Larson, C.L., Slack, D.C., 1984. Tilled soil subsidence during repeated wetting. Trans. ASAE 27, 733-736.
42. Paavilainen, E., 1967. Relationships between the root system of Scots pine and the air content of peat. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 63 (6), 1-20 (in Finnish with English summary).
43. Päivänen, J., 1973. Hydraulic conductivity and water retention in peat soils. Acta For. Fenn. 129.
44. Ratliff, L.F., Ritchie, J.T., Cassel, D.K., 1992. Field measured limits of soil water availability as related to laboratory-measured properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47, 770-775.
45. Rawls, W.J., Brakensiek, D.L., Saxton, K.E., 1982. Estimation of soil water properties. Trans. ASAE 25, 1316-1320.
46. Reeve, M.J., Smith, P.D., Thomasson, A.J., 1973. The effect of density on water retention properties of field soils. J. Soil Sci. 24, 355-367.
47. Rivers, E.D., Shipp, R.F., 1972. Available water capacity of sandy and gravelly North Dakota soils. Soil Sci. 113, 74-80.
48. Romanyà, J., Cortina, J., Falloon, P., Coleman, K., Smith, P., 2000. Modelling changes in soil organic matter after planting fast-growing Pinus radiata on Mediterranean agricultural soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 51, 627-641.
49. Rossi, S., Varmola, M., Hyppönen, M., 1993. Success of afforestation of old fields in Finnish Lapland. Folia For. 807 (in Finnish with English summary).
50. Rousseva, S.S., Ahuja, L.R., Heathman, G.C., 1988. Use of a surface gamma-neutron gauge for in situ measurement of changes in bulk density of the tilled zone. Soil Till. Res. 12, 235-251.
51. Salter, P.J., Williams, J.B., 1967. The influence of texture on the moisture characteristics of soils. IV. A method of estimating the available-water capacities of profiles in the field. J. Soil Sci. 18, 174-181.
52. Salter, P.J., Williams, J.B., 1969. The influence of texture on the moisture characteristics of soils. V. Relationships between particle-size composition and moisture contents at the upper and lower limits of available-water. J. Soil Sci. 20, 126-131.
53. Salter, P.J., Berry, G., Williams, J.B., 1966. The influence of texture on the moisture characteristics of soils. III. Quantitative relationships between particle size, composition, and available-water capacity. J. Soil Sci. 17, 93-98.
54. Scheinost, A.C., Sinowski, W., Auerswald, K., 1997. Regionalization of soil water retention curves in a highly variable soilscape. I. Developing a pedotransfer function. Geoderma 78, 129-143.
55. Shaykewich, C.F., Zwarich, M.A., 1968. Relationships between soil physical constants and soil physical components of some Manitoba soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 48, 199-204.
56. Soane, B.D., Blackwell, P.S., Dickson, J.W., Painter, D.J., 1981. Compaction by agricultural vehicles: a review. II. Compaction under tyres and other running gear. Soil Till. Res. 1, 373-400.
57. Stevenson, D.S., 1974. Influence of peat moss on soil water retention for plants. Can. J. Soil Sci. 54, 109-110.
58. Tamminen, P., Starr, M., 1994. Bulk density of forested mineral soils. Silva Fenn. 28, 53-60.
59. Tyler, S.W., Wheatcraft, S.W., 1989. Application of fractal mathematics to soil water retention estimation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53, 987-996.
60. Urvas, L., Erviö, R., 1974. Influence of the soil type and the chemical properties of soil on the determining of the forest type. J. Sci. Agric. Soc. Finland 3, 307-319.
61. Valtanen, J., 1991. Peltojen metsityksen onnistuminen Pohjois-Pohjanmaalla 1970-luvulla. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 381 (in Finnish).
62. Van den Berg, M., Klamt, E., van Reeuwijk, L.P., Sombroek, W.G., 1997. Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of moisture retention characteristics of Ferrasols and related soils. Geoderma 78, 161-180.
63. Vereecken, H., Maes, J., Feyen, J., Darius, P., 1989. Estimating the soil moisture retention characteristic from texture, bulk density, and carbon content. Soil Sci. 148, 389-403.
64. Wall, A., Heiskanen, J., 1998. Physical properties of afforested former agricultural peat soils in western Finland. Suo 49, 1-12.
65. Warkentin, B.P., 1984. Physical properties of forest-nursery soils: Relation to seedling growth. In: Duryea, M.L., Landis, T.D. (Eds.), Forest Nursery Manual: Production of Bareroot Seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers/The Hague, Boston/Lancaster, pp. 53-61.
66. Westman, C.J., 1983. Physical and physico-chemical properties of forest tree nursery soils and their relation to the amount of organic matter. Acta For. Fenn. 184 (in Finnish with English summary.)
67. Yli-Halla, M., Mokma, D.L., 1999. Classification of soils of Finland according to soil taxonomy. Soil Surv. Horiz. 40, 59-69.