Evaluating the role of particle distribution and shape in two-body abrasion by statistical simulation

Tribology International

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 255-270

  De Pellegrin, D V ^a   Stachowiak, G W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Abrasion; Particle; Shape; Simulation; Size effect; Surface

Indexed keywords

ABRASIVES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRINDING (MACHINING); PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

PARTICLE DISTRIBUTION;

ABRASION;

EID: 0345330009     PISSN: 0301679X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2003.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Malkin S. Grinding technology: theory and applications of machining with abrasives. 1989;Ellis Horwood, Chichester.
2. Hutchings I.M. Tribology: friction and wear of materials. 1992;139-140 Edward Arnold, London.
3. Williams J.A. Engineering Tribology. 1994;Oxford University Press, NY.
4. Kruschov M.M. Principles of abrasive wear. Wear. 28:1974;69-88.
5. Torrance A.A. The correlation of process parameters in grinding. Wear. 156:1992;281-299.
6. De Pellegrin D.V., Stachowiak G.W. Assessing the role of particle shape and scale in abrasion using 'sharpness analysis', Part I. Technique development. Wear. 253:2002;1016-1025.
7. Mulhearn T.O., Samuels L.E. The abrasion of metals: A model of the process. Wear. 5:1962;478-498.
8. Rabinowicz E. Friction and Wear of Materials. 1965;John Wiley, New York. p. 39, 169.
9. Goddard J., Wilman H. A theory of friction and wear during the abrasion of metals. Wear. 5:1962;114-135.
10. Hisakado T., Suda H. Effects of asperity shape and summit height distributions on friction and wear characteristics. Wear. 225-229:1999;450-457.
11. Moore M.A., Swanson P.A. The effect of particle shape on abrasive wear: A comparison of theory and experiment. Proc Int Conf Wear of Materials: 1983;1-11 ASME, NY.
12. Hokkirigawa K., Kato K. Ploughing, cutting and wedge formation during abrasive wear. Tribology International. 21:(1):1988;51-57.
13. O'Neill H. Hardness measurement of metals and alloys. 1967;24 Chapman and Hall, London.
14. De Pellegrin D.V., Stachowiak G.W. Assessing the role of particle shape and scale in abrasion using 'sharpness analysis', Part II. Technique evaluation. Wear. 253:2002;1026-1034.
15. Greenwood J.A., Wu J.J. Surface roughness and contact: An apology. Meccanica. 36:2001;617-630.
16. De Pellegrin D.V., Stachowiak G.W. Sharpness of abrasive particles and surfaces. Stachowiak G.W. Proc 6th Int Trib Conf, Austrib'02: 2002;203-210.
17. Hecker R.L., Liang S.Y. Predictive modeling of surface roughness in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manufact. 43:(8):2003;755-761.
18. Archard J.F. Elastic deformation and the laws of friction. Proc Roy Soc Lond A. 243:1957;190-205.
19. Lortz W. A model of the cutting mechanism in grinding. Wear. 53:1979;115-128.
20. Koshy P., Jain V.K., Lal G.K. A model for the topography of diamond grinding wheels. Wear. 169:1993;237-242.
21. Gotoh K., Finney J.L. Representation of the size and shape of a single particle. Powder Technology. 12:(2):1975;125-130.
22. Masen M.A., De Rooij M.B. Abrasive wear between rough surfaces in deep drawing. Stachowiak G.W. Proc 6th Int Trib Conf, Austrib'02: 2002;601-608.
23. Bush A.W., Gibson R.D., Thomas T.R. The elastic contact of a rough surface. Wear. 35:1975;87-111.
24. Jiang J., Sheng F., Ren F. Modelling of two-body abrasive wear under multiple contact conditions. Wear. 217:1997;35-45.
25. Jacobson S., Wallen P., Hogmark S. Fundamental aspects of abrasive wear studied by a new numerical simulation model. Wear. 123:1988;207-223.
26. Torrance A.A. The correlation of process parameters in grinding. Wear. 139:1990;383-401.
27. Torrance A.A., Badger J.A. The relation between the traverse dressing of vitrified grinding wheels and their performance. Int J Mach Tools Manufact. 40:2000;1787-1811.
28. Turcotte D.L. Fractals and chaos in geology and geophysics, 2nd ed. 1997;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. p. 35.
29. Yoshikawa H., Sata T. Simulated grinding process by Monte-Carlo method. Ann CIRP. 16:1968;297-302.
30. König W., Steffens K. A numerical method to describe the kinematics of grinding. Ann CIRP. 32:1983;201-204.
31. Chiu N., Malkin S. Computer simulation for cylindrical plunge grinding. Ann CIRP. 42:1993;383-387.
32. Warnecke G., Zitt U. Kinematic simulation for analyzing and predicting high-performance grinding processes. Ann CIRP. 47:1998;265-270.
33. Chen X., Rowe W.B. Analysis and simulation of the grinding process, Part I: generation of the grinding wheel surface. Int J Mach Tools Manufact. 36:(8):1996;871-882.
34. Fang L., Xing J., Du D., Zhang X., Xue Q. Computer simulation of two-body abrasion processes. Wear. 251:2001;1356-1360.
35. Whitehouse D.J. Fractal or fiction. Wear. 249:2001;345-353.
36. Greenwood J.A., Williamson J.B.P. The contact of nominally flat rough surfaces. Proc Roy Soc Lond A. 495:1966;300-319.
37. Whitehouse D.J., Archard J.F. Properties of random surfaces of significance in their contact. Proc Roy Soc Lond A. 316:1970;97-121.
38. McCool J.I. Comparison of models for the contact of rough surfaces. Wear. 107:1986;37-60.
39. Xie Y., Williams J.A. The prediction of friction and wear when a soft surface slides against a harder rough surface. Wear. 196:1996;21-34.
40. Blunt L., Ebdon S. The application of three-dimensional surface measurement techniques to characterizing grinding wheel topography. Int J Mach Tools Manufact. 36:(11):1996;1207-1226.
41. Johnson K.L. Contact mechanics. 1985;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. p. 176.
42. Larsen-Badse J. Some effects of specimen size on abrasive wear. Wear. 19:1972;27-35.
43. Gao H., Huang Y., Nix W.D. Modeling plasticity at the micrometer scale. Naturwissenschaften. 86:1999;507-515.