Effects of identification and usefulness of the Lie Scale of the Drug Use Screening Inventory (DUSI-R) in the assessment of adolescent drug use

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 215-223

  Dalla Déa, Hilda Regina Ferreira ^a   De Micheli, Denise ^b   Souza Formigoni, Maria Lucia O ^b  

^a PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DE SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Anonymity; Lie Scale; Screening; Self report; Survey methods

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; ANALGESIC AGENT; CANNABIS; COCAINE; OPIATE; TRANQUILIZER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG USE; DRUG USE SCREENING INVENTORY R; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL; SCHOOL CHILD; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING TEST; SELF REPORT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT; TOBACCO; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0345303954     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00219-9     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Babor T.F., Steinberg K., Anton R. Talk is cheap: measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials. J. Stud. Alcohol. 61:2000;55-63.
2. Bjarnason T. Administration mode bias in a school survey on alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use. Addiction. 90:1995;555-559.
3. Del Boca F.K., Noll J.A. Truth or consequences: the validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction. 95(3):1999;347-360.
4. De Micheli D., Formigoni M.L.O.S. Screening of drug use in a teenage Brazilian sample using the Drug Use Screening Inventory (DUSI). Addict. Behav. 25(5):2000;683-691.
5. De Micheli D., Formigoni M.L.O.S. Are reasons for the first use of drugs and family circumstances predictors of future use patterns? Addict. Behav. 27:2002a;87-100.
6. De Micheli D., Formigoni M.L.O.S. Psychometrics properties of the Brazilian version of DUSI (Drug Use Screening Inventory). Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 26(10):2002b;1523-1528.
7. Fisher D., Beer J. Codependency and self-esteem among high school students. Psychol. Rep. 66:1990;1001-1002.
8. Johnston, L.D., O'Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., 2001. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2000. Secondary School Students, vol. I., NIH Publication No. 01-4924, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD.
9. Kirisci L., Hsu T.C., Tarter R. Fitting a two-parameter logistic item response model to clarify the psychometric properties of the Drug Use Screening Inventory for adolescent alcohol and drug abusers. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 18:1994;1335-1341.
10. Kirisci L., Mezzich A., Tarter R. Norms and sensitivity of the adolescent version of the Drug Use Screening Inventory. Addict. Behav. 20(2):1995;149-157.
11. Leonhard C., Gastfriend D.R., Tuffy L.J., Neil J., Plough A. The effect of anonymous versus nonanonymous rating conditions on patient satisfaction and motivation ratings in a population of substance abuse patients. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 21(4):1997;627-630.
12. McAllister I., Makkai T. Correcting for the underreporting of drug use in opinion surveys. Int. J. Addict. 26(9):1991;945-961.
13. McMurran M., Hollin C.R., Bowen A. Consistencyof alcohol self-report measures in a male young offender population. Br. J. Addict. 85:1990;205-208.
14. Sobell L.C., Sobell M.B. Self-report issues in alcohol abuse: state of the art and future directions. Behav. Assess. 12:1990;77-90.
15. Tarter R.E. Evaluation and treatment of adolescent substance abuse: A decision tree method. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse. 16(1-2):1990;1-46.
16. Tarter R.E., Mezzich A.C., Kirisci L., Kaczynski N.A. Reliability of the drug use screening inventory among adolescent alcoholics. J. Child Adol. Subst. Abuse. 3(1):1994;25-36.
17. Workman M., Beer J. Self-esteem depression and alcohol dependency among high school students. Psychol. Rep. 65:1989;451-455.