Parallel multipole implementation of the generalized Helmholtz decomposition for solving viscous flow problems

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 58, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1617-1635

  Brown, Mary J ^a   Mammoli, Andrea A ^a   Ingber, Marc S ^a  

^a University of New Mexico   (United States)

Author keywords

Generalized Helmholtz decomposition; Multipole acceleration; Parallel algorithms; Vorticity method

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BENCHMARKING; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; PROBLEM SOLVING; VORTEX FLOW;

HELMHOLTZ DECOMPOSITION; PARALLELIZATION PROCEDURE;

VISCOSITY;

ALGORITHM; MATHEMATICAL METHOD; PARALLEL COMPUTING; VISCOUS FLOW;

EID: 0345303892     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.830     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Brown M, Ingber M. Parallelization of a vorticity formulation for the analysis of incompressible viscous fluid flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2002; 39:979-999.
2. Ingber MS, Kempka SN. A Galerkin implementation of the generalized Helmholtz decomposition for vorticity formulations. Journal of Computational Physics 2001; 169:215-237.
3. Barnes J, Hut P. A hierarchical O(N log N) force-calculation algorithm. Nature 1986; 324:446-449.
4. Greengard L, Rokhlin V. A fast algorithm for particle simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 1987; 73:325-348.
5. Greengard L, Rokhlin V. The rapid evaluation of potential fields in three dimensions. In Vortex Methods, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1360. Anderson CR, Greengard L (eds), Springer: Berlin, New York, 1988; 121-141.
6. Strickland JH, Baty RS. An overview of fast multipole methods. Technical Report SAND95-2405, Sandia National Laboratories, 1995.
7. Pringle GJ. Numerical study of three-dimensional flow using fast parallel particle algorithms. Ph.D. Thesis, Napier University, 1994.
8. Gòmez JE, Power H. A multipole direct and indirect BEM for 2D cavity flow at low Reynolds number. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 1997; 19:17-31.
9. Korsmeyer FT, Yue DKP, Nabors K, White J. Multipole-accelerated preconditioned iterative methods for three-dimensional potential problems. In Boundary Elements XV, vol. 1, Rencis JJ, Brebbia CA (eds); Computational Mechanics Publications: Southampton, 1993; 517-527.
10. Mammoli AA, Ingber MS. Parallel multipole BEM simulation of two-dimensional suspension flows. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 2000; 24:65-73.
11. Ingber M, Mammoli A, Brown M. A comparison of domain integral evaluation techniques for boundary element methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2001; 52:417-432.
12. Partridge PW, Brebbia CA, Wrobel LC. The Dual Reciprocity Boundary Element Method. Computational Mechanics Publications: Southampton, 1992.
13. Henry DP, Banerjee PK. A new boundary element formulation for two- and three-dimensional themoelasticity using particular integrals. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1988; 26:2061-2077.
14. Kempka S, Glass M, Perry J, Strickland J, Ingber M. Accuracy considerations for implementing velocity boundary conditions in vorticity formulations. Technical Report SAN D96-0583, Sandia National Laboratories, 1996.