The responses of Scots pine, Pinus sylvestris, to natural and artificial defoliation stress

Ecological Applications

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 469-474

  Lyytikäinen Saarenmaa, Päivi ^a,b  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Diprionid sawflies; Leader shoot; Needle damage; Nutrient concentration; Pinus sylvestris; Scots pine

Indexed keywords

DEFOLIATION; GROWTH RESPONSE; STRESS; TREE;

PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 0345211608     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0469:TROSPP]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Austarå, Ø., A. Orlund, A. Svendsrud, and A. Veidahl. 1987. Growth losses and economic consequences following two years defoliation of Pinus sylvestris by the pine sawfly Neodiprion sertifer in West-Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 2:111-119.
2. Baldwin, I. T. 1990. Herbivory simulations in ecological research. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 3:91-93.
3. BMDP. 1988. Statistical software. Volume 1. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
4. Britton, R. J. 1988. Physiological effects of natural and artificial defoliation on the growth of young crops of lodgepole pine. Forestry 61:165-175.
5. Bryant, J. P., F. S. Chapin III, and D. R. Klein. 1983. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357-368.
6. Ericsson, A., S. Larsson, and O. Tenow. 1980. Effects of early and late season defoliation on growth and carbohydrate dynamics in Scots pine. Journal of Applied Ecology 17:747-769.
7. Geri, C., F. Goussard, and J. Levieux. 1990. Incidence de la consommation du feuillage de Pins sylvestres précédemment défeuillés sur le développement et la fécodité de Diprion pini L. (Hym., Diprionidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 109:436-447.
8. Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
9. Hartley, S. E., and J. H. Lawton. 1991. Biochemical aspects and significance of the rapidly induced accumulation of phenols in birch foliage. Pages 105-132 in D. W. Tallamy and M. J. Raupp, editors. Phytochemical induction by herbivores. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
10. Haukioja, E., and T. Honkanen. 1996. Why are tree responses to herbivory so variable? Pages 1-10 in W. J. Mattson, P. Niemelä, and M. Rousi, editors. Dynamics of forest herbivory: quest for pattern and principle. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report NC-183.
11. Honkanen, T., E. Haukioja, and J. Suomela. 1994. Effects of simulated defoliation and debudding on needle and shoot growth in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris): implications of plant source/sink relationships for plant-herbivore studies. Functional Ecology 8:631-639.
12. Kozlowski, T. T. 1969. Tree physiology and forest pests. Journal of Forestry 67:118-123.
13. Kulman, H. M. 1971. Effects of insect defoliation on growth and mortality of trees. Annual Review of Entomology 16: 289-324.
14. Larsson, S. 1989. Stressful times for the plant stress-insect performance hypothesis. Oikos 56:277-283.
15. Larsson, S., and O. Tenow. 1984. Areal distribution of a Neodiprion sertifer (Hym., Diprionidae) outbreak on Scots pine as related to stand condition. Holarctic Ecology 7:81-90.
16. Lyytikäinen, P. 1994. Effects of natural and artificial defoliations on sawfly performance and foliar chemistry of Scots pine saplings. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31:307-318.
17. Mattson, W. J., and N. D. Addy. 1975. Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production. Science (Washington, DC) 190:515-521.
18. Mattson, W. J., and J. M. Scriber. 1987. Nutritional ecology of insect folivores of woody plants: nitrogen, water, fiber, and mineral considerations. Pages 105-146 in F. Slansky and J. G. Rodriquez, editors. Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders, and related invertebrates. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
19. Miller, K. K., and M. R. Wagner. 1989. Effect of pandora moth (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) defoliation on growth of ponderosa pine in Arizona. Journal of Economic Entomology 82:1682-1686.
20. Osman, K. A., and S. H. Sharrow. 1993. Growth responses of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) to defoliation. Forest Ecology and Management 60:105-117.
21. Piene, H., and C. H. A. Little. 1990. Spruce budworm defoliation and growth loss in young balsam fir: artificial defoliation of potted trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20:902-909.
22. Piene, H., and K. E. Percy. 1984. Changes in needle morphology, anatomy, and mineral content during the recovery of protected balsam fir trees initially defoliated by the spruce budworm. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 14: 238-245.
23. Sanchez-Martinez, G., and M. R. Wagner. 1994. Sawfly (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae) and artificial defoliation affects above-and below-ground growth of ponderosa pine seedlings. Journal of Economic Entomology 87:1038-1045.
24. Straw, N. 1996. The impact of pine looper moth, Bupalus piniaria L. (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) on the growth of Scots pine in Tentsmuir Forest, Scotland. Forest Ecology and Management 87:209-232.
25. Trewhella, K. E., S. R. Leather, and K. R. Day. 1997. Insect induced resistance in Lodgepole pine: effects on two pine feeding insects. Journal of Applied Entomology 121:129-136.
26. Tuomi, J., P. Niemelä, F. S. Chapin, J. P. Bryant, and S. Sirén. 1988. Defensive responses of trees in relation to their carbon/nutrient balance. Pages 57-72 in W. J. Mattson, J. Levieux, and C. Bernard-Dagan, editors. Mechanisms of woody plant defenses against insects: search for pattern. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
27. Viitasaari, M., and M. Varama. 1987. Sahapistiäiset 4. Havupistiäiset (Diprionidae). Summary: Sawflies 4. Conifer sawflies (Diprionidae). University of Helsinki, Department of Agricultural and Forest Zoology, Report 10.