Glandectomy with preservation of corpora cavernosa in the treatment of penile carcinoma

International Braz J Urol

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 437-440

  Da Fonseca, Aluízio Gonçalves ^a,b   Rabelo, Gilflávio N ^a   Vidal, Kallene S M ^a   de Sousa, Fernando J ^a  

^a Hospital Ofir Loyola   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Minimally invasive; Penile cancer; Penis; Surgery; Surgical procedures

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER CONTROL; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SIZE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MALE; PENIS AMPUTATION; PENIS CARCINOMA; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEXUAL FUNCTION; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

EID: 0345170701     PISSN: 16775538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382003000500010     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Jensen MS: Cancer of the penis in Denmark 1942 to 1962 (511 cases). Danish Med Bull. 1977; 24: 66-72.
2. Bissada NK: Conservative extirpative treatment of cancer of the penis. Urol Clin North Am. 1992; 19: 283-90.
3. Davis JW, Schellhammer PF, Schlossberg SM: Conservative surgical therapy for penile and urethral carcinoma. Urology. 1999; 53: 386-92.
4. Agrawal A, Pai D, Ananthakrishnan N, Smile SR, Ratnakar C: The histological extent of local spread of carcinoma of the penis and its therapeutic implications. BJU Int. 2000; 85: 299-301.
5. Pizzocaro G, Stagni S, Di Palo A: Conservative treatment possibilities in category T1N0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis. J Urol. 1997; 157 (suppl): 47.