Influence of sperm morphology in intra-uterine insemination outcomes;Influencia de la morfología espermática en los resultados de inseminación intrauterina

Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico

Volumn 71, Issue SEPT., 2003, Pages 455-459

  Saucedo De La Llata, Eric ^a   Moraga Sánchez, María Rosa ^a   Batiza Resendiz, Víctor ^a   Galache Vega, Pedro ^a   Santos Haliscak, Roberto ^a   Hernández Ayup, Samuel ^a  

^a Inst el Estud de Concepcion Humana   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Intra uterine insemination; Sperm morphology

Indexed keywords

CLOMIFENE CITRATE; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN;

ANOVULATION; ARTICLE; CELL STRUCTURE; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OVARY HYPERSTIMULATION; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPERM; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; UTERINE CERVIX;

ADULT; HUMANS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL, HOMOLOGOUS; MALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPERM COUNT; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 0345169811     PISSN: 03009041     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Duran HE, Morshedi M, Kruger T, et al. Intrauterine insemination: a systemic review on determinants of success. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:373-84.
2. Van Voorhis BJ, Barnett M, Sparks AE, et al. Effect of the total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2001;75:661-8.
3. Campana A, Sakkas D, Stalberg A, et al. Intrauterine insemination: evaluation of the results according to the woman's age, sperm quality, total sperm count per insemination and life table analysis. Hum Reprod 1996;11:732-6.
4. Dickey RP, Pyrzak R, Lu PY, et al. Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm. Fertil Steril 1999;71:684-9.
5. Miller DC, Hollenbeck BK, Smith GD, et al. Processed total motile sperm count correlates with pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination. Urology 2002;60:497-501.
6. Ombelet W, Vandeput H, Van de Putte G, et al. Intrauterine insemination after ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: predictive potential of inseminating motile count and sperm morphology. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1458-63.
7. Matorras R, Corcostegui B, Perez C, et al. Sperm morphology analysis (strict criteria) in male infertility is not a prognostic factor in intrauterine insemination with husband's sperm. Fertil Steril 1995;63:608-11.
8. Karabinus DS, Gelety TJ. The impact of sperm morphology evaluated by strict criteria on intrauterine insemination success. Fertil. Steril 1997;67:536-41.
9. Francavilla F, Romano R, Santucci R, et al. Effect of sperm morphology and motile sperm count on outcome of intrauterine insemination in oligozoospermia and/or asthenozoospermia. Fertil Steril 1990;53:892-7.
10. Shulman A, Hauser R, Liupitz S, et al. Sperm motility is a major determinant of pregnancy outcome following intrauterine insemination. J. Assist Reprod Genet 1998;15:381-5.
11. Burr RW, Siegberg R, Flaherty SP, et al. The influence of sperm morphology and the number of motile sperm inseminated on the outcome of intrauterine insemination combined with mild ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 1996;65:127-32.