Memory assessment during the intracarotid amobarbital procedure: Influence of injection order

Neurology

Volumn 61, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1582-1587

  Bengner, T ^a,b   Haettig, H ^a   Merschhemke, M ^a   Dehnicke, C ^a   Meencke, H J ^a  

^a Evangelisches Krankhs Koenigin EH ^*  (Germany)

^b Evangelisches Krankhs Konigin E H   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMOBARBITAL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; INJECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEMORY; MEMORY DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0345168858     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000096171.40548.E4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Wada J. A new method for determination of the side of cerebral speech dominance: a preliminary report on the intracarotid injection of sodium Amytal in man. Igaku to Seibutsugaku [Med Biol] 1949;14:221-222.
2. Milner B, Branch C, Rasmussen T. Study of short-term memory after intracarotid injection of sodium Amytal. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 1962;87:224-226.
3. Rosadini G, Rossi GF. On the suggested cerebral dominance for consciousness. Brain 1967;90:101-112.
4. Rausch R, Silfvenius H, Wieser HG, Dodrill CB, Meador KJ, Jones-Gotman M. Intraarterial amobarbital procedures. In: Engel J, ed. Surgical treatment of the epilepsies. New York: Raven Press, 1993:341-357.
5. Grote CL, Wierenga C, Smith MC, et al. Wada difference a day makes: interpretive cautions regarding same-day injections. Neurology 1999;52:1577-1582.
6. Dodrill CB, Ojemann GA. An exploratory comparison of three methods of memory assessment with the intracarotid amobarbital procedure. Brain Cogn 1997;33:210-223.
7. Hamberger MJ, Hirsch LJ. Effects of incorporating memory confidence ratings and language handicap modifications on intracarotid amobarbital procedure (Wada test) memory asymmetry scores. Epilepsia 1999;40:1286-1291.
8. Meador KJ, Loring DW, Lee GP, Nichols ME, Moore EE, Figueroa RE. Level of consciousness and memory during the intracarotid sodium amobarbital procedure. Brain Cogn 1997;33:178-188.
9. Rausch R, Babb TL, Engel J, Crandall PH. Memory following intracarotid amobarbital injection contralateral to hippocampal damage. Arch Neurol 1989;46:783-788.
10. Dinner DS. Intracarotid amobarbital test to define language lateralization. In: Lüders H, ed. Epilepsy surgery. New York: Raven Press, 1991:503-506.
11. Selwa L, Buchtel HA, Henry TR. Electrocerebral recovery during the intracarotid amobarbital procedure: influence of interval between injections. Epilepsia 1997;38:1294-1299.
12. Schmidt KH, Metzler P. Wortschatztest. Weinheim: Beltz Test, 1992.
13. Sturm W, Willmes K. LPS-K-Eine LPS-Kurzform für hirngeschä digte Patienten mit Anleitung zur psychometrischen Einzelfalldiagnostik. Diagnostica 1983;29:346-359.
14. Horn W. Leistungsprüfsystem (L-P-S). Göttingen: Hogrefe, 1983.
15. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97-113.
16. Meador KJ, Loring DW, Lee GP, Nichols ME, Moore EE, Figueroa RE. Level of consciousness and memory during the intracarotid sodium amobarbital procedure. Brain Cogn 1997;33:178-188.
17. Lesser RP, Dinner DS, Luders H, Morris HH. Memory for objects presented soon after intracarotid amobarbital sodium injections in patients with medically intractable complex partial seizures. Neurology 1986;36:895-899.
18. Brunner E, Domhof S, Langer F. Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments. New York: Wiley, 2002.
19. Loring DW, Hermann BP, Perrine K, Plenger PM, Lee GP, Meador KJ. Effect of Wada memory stimulus type in discriminating lateralized temporal lobe impairment. Epilepsia 1997;38:219-224.
20. Glosser G, Cole LC, Deutsch GK, et al. Hemispheric asymmetries in arousal affect outcome of the intracarotid amobarbital test. Neurology 1999;52:1583-1590.
21. Chelune G. Hippocampal adequacy versus functional reserve: predicting memory functions following temporal lobectomy. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1995;10:413-432.
22. Kneebone AC, Chelune GJ, Dinner DS, Naugle RI, Awad IA. Intracarotid amobarbital procedure as a predictor of material-specific memory change after anterior temporal lobectomy. Epilepsia 1995;36:857-865.
23. Jokeit H, Ebner A, Holthausen H, et al. Individual prediction of change in delayed recall of prose passages after left-sided anterior temporal lobectomy. Neurology 1997;49:481-487.
24. Bell BD, Davies KG, Haltiner AM, Walters GL. Intracarotid amobarbital procedure and prediction of postoperative memory in patients with left temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis. Epilepsia 2000;41:992-997.
25. Wyllie E, Naugle R, Chelune G, Luders H, Morris H, Skibinski C. Intracarotid amobarbital procedure: II. Lateralizing value in evaluation for temporal lobectomy. Epilepsia 1991;32:865-869.
26. Carpenter K, Oxbury JM, Oxbury S, Wright GD. Memory for objects presented early after intracarotid sodium Amytal: a sensitive clinical neuropsychological indicator of temporal lobe pathology. Seizure 1996;5:103-108.
27. Christianson SA, Saisa J, Silfvenius H. Hemisphere memory differences in sodium Amytal testing of epileptic patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1990;12:681-694.
28. Tulving E, Markowitsch HJ. Memory beyond the hippocampus. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1997;7:209-216.
29. Ojemann JG, Kelley WM. The frontal lobe role in memory: a review of convergent evidence and implications for the Wada memory test. Epilepsy Behav 2002;3:309-313.