Habitat use by nonnative rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, and native Little Colorado spinedace, Lepidomeda vittata

Environmental Biology of Fishes

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 205-214

  Robinson, Anthony T ^a   Bryan, Scott D ^a   Sweetser, Michael G ^a  

^a ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

Co occurrence; Microhabitat use; Native nonnative interactions

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; FISH; HABITAT USE; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MICROHABITAT; NATIVE SPECIES;

CATOSTOMUS; CATOSTOMUS DISCOBOLUS; CYPRINIDAE; LEPIDOMEDA; LEPIDOMEDA VITTATA; ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; PISCES; RHINICHTHYS; RHINICHTHYS OSCULUS; SALMONIDAE; THALASSOMA BIFASCIATUM;

EID: 0345166883     PISSN: 03781909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:EBFI.0000003914.90508.bd     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baltz, D.M. & P.B. Moyle. 1993. Invasion resistance to introduced species by a native assemblage of stream fishes. Ecol. Appl. 3: 246-255.
2. Blinn, D.W., C. Runck, D.A. Clark & J.N. Rinne. 1993. Effects of rainbow trout predation on Little Colorado spinedace. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 122: 139-143.
3. Bryan, S.D., A.T. Robinson & M.G. Sweetser. 2002. Behavioral responses of a small native fish to multiple introduced predators. Environ. Biol. Fish. 63: 49-56.
4. Byström, P., L. Persson & E. Wahlström. 1998. Competing predators and prey: Juvenile bottlenecks in whole-lake experiments. Ecology 79: 2153-2167.
5. Childs, M.R., R.W. Clarkson & A.T. Robinson. 1998. Resource use by larval and early juvenile native fishes in the Little Colorado River, Grand Canyon, Arizona. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 127: 620-629.
6. Fausch, K.D. 1988. Tests of competition between native and introduced salmonids in streams: What have we learned? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45: 2238-2246.
7. Lundvall, D., R. Svanbäck, L. Persson & P. Byström. 1999. Size-dependent predation in piscivores: Interactions between predator foraging and prey avoidance abilities. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 1285-1292.
8. Meffe, G.K. 1985. Predation and species replacement in American Southwest fishes: A case study. Southwest. Nat. 30: 173-187.
9. Miller, R.R. 1961. Man and the changing fish fauna of the American Southwest. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 46: 365-404.
10. Miller, R.R. 1963. Distribution, variation, and ecology of Lepidomeda vittata, a rare cyprinid fish endemic to eastern Arizona. Copeia 1963: 1-5.
11. Minckley, W.L. 1991. Native fishes of the Grand Canyon region: An obituary? pp. 124-177. In: National Research Council (ed.) Colorado River Ecology and Dam Management, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
12. Minckley, W.L. & L.H. Carufel. 1967. The Little Colorado River spinedace, Lepidomeda vittata, in Arizona. Southwest. Nat. 12: 291-302.
13. Minckley, W.L. & J.E. Deacon (ed.). 1991. Battle Against Extinction; Native Fish Management in the American Southwest. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 517 pp.
14. Moyle, P.B. 1976. Fish introductions in California: History and impact on native fishes. Biol. Conserv. 9: 101-117.
15. Moyle, P.B. 1986. Fish introductions into North America: Patterns and ecological impact pp. 27-43. In: H.A. Mooney & J.A. Drake (ed.) Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii, Springer-Verlag, New York.
16. Moyle, P.B. & T. Light. 1996. Fish invasions in California: Do abiotic factors determine success? Ecology 77: 1666-1670.
17. Post, J.R., E.A. Parkinson & N.T. Johnston. 1999. Density-dependent processes in structured fish populations: Interaction strengths in whole-lake experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 69: 155-175.
18. Rinne, J.N. & M. Alexander. 1995. Non-native salmonid predation on two threatened native species: Preliminary observations of field and laboratory studies. Proc. Desert Fishes Council 26: 114-117.
19. Rinne, J.N. & J. Janisch. 1995. Coldwater fish stocking and native fishes in Arizona: Past, present, and future. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 15: 397-406.
20. Ross, S.T. 1986. Resource partitioning in fish assemblages: A review of field studies. Copeia 1986: 352-388.
21. Ross, S.T. 1991. Mechanisms structuring stream fish assemblages: Are there lessons from introduced species? Environ. Biol. Fish. 30: 359-368.
22. Runck, C. & D.W. Blinn. 1993. Seasonal diet of Lepidomeda vittata, a threatened cyprinid fish in Arizona. Southwest. Nat. 38: 157-159.
23. Sokal, R.R. & F.J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry, 2nd edition. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, California. 859 pp.
24. Sweetser, M.G., S.D. Bryan & A.T. Robinson. 2002. Movement, distribution, and predation: Lepidomeda vittata and non-native salmonids in eastern Arizona. West. N. Am. Nat. 62: 197-205.
25. Tonn, W.M., C.A. Paszkowski & I.J. Holopainen. 1989. Responses of crucian carp populations to differential predation pressure in a manipulated pond. Can. J. Zool. 67: 2841-2849.
26. Tonn, W.M., C.A. Paszkowski & I.J. Holopainen. 1992. Piscivory and recruitment: Mechanisms structuring prey populations in small lakes. Ecology 73: 951-958.
27. Werner, E.E. & J.F. Gilliam. 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 15: 393-425.
28. Werner, E.E., J.F. Gilliam, D.J. Hall & G.G. Mittelbach. 1983. An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64: 1540-1548.
29. Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd edition. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 718 pp.
30. Zaret, T.M. & A.S. Rand. 1971. Competition in tropical stream fishes: Support for the competitive exclusion principle. Ecology 52: 336-342.