Rethinking How Nonindustrial Landowners View Their Lands

Southern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 150-158

  Kluender, R A ^a   Walkingstick, T L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b University of Arkansas Fayetteville   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345136635     PISSN: 01484419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sjaf/24.3.150     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ARGOW, K. 1996. This land is their land: The potential and diversity of nonindustrial private forests. J. For. 94 (2):30-33.
2. BLISS, J.C., S.K. NEPAL, R.T. BROOKS, JR., AND M.D. LARSEN. 1997. In the mainstream: Environmental attitudes of mid-south forest owners. South. J. Appl. For. 21 (1):37-43.
3. CUBBACE, F.W., AND D.N. WEAR. 1993. Can nonindustrial private forest landowners make up the shortfall in timber production from national forests? P. 421-426 in Proc. of the 1993 Soc. of Am. For. Nat. Convention. Soc. Am. For., Bethesda, MD.
4. Doolittle, L., and T.J. Straka. 1987. Regeneration following harvest on nonindustrial private pine sites in the south: A diffusion of innovations perspective. South. J. Appl. For. 11(1):37-41.
5. GRAMANN, J.H., T.D. MARTY, AND W.B. KURTZ. 1985 A logistic analysis of the effects of beliefs and past experience on management plans for nonindustrial private forests. J. Environ. Manage. 20:347-356.
6. GREENE, J.L., AND K.A. BLATNER. 1986. Identifying woodland owner characteristics associated with timber management. For. Sci. 32:(1)135-146.
7. HAYMOND, J.L. 1988. Adoption of silvicultural practices by opinion leaders who own nonindustrial private forest land. South. J. Appl. For. 12(1):2-23.
8. HOGE, D.A. 1997. NIPF landowners: Who's regenerating, who's not and why. For. Landowner. 66:(5)32-33.
9. HOWARD, J.L. 1997. U.S. timber production, trade consumption and price statistics, 1965-1994. USDA For. Serv., For. Prod. Lab. 1997. 80 p.
10. KLUENDER, R.A. 1997. Implications for the forest products industry. In Proceedings: Arkansas forestry forum, Guldin, J. (ed.). USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-GTR.
11. KLUENDER, R.A., AND J.L. GREENE. 1990. Economic optimization of political decisions. P. 143-149 in Proc., Southern For. Econ. Meet.: Evaluating even and uneven-aged timber management options for southern forest lands, Hickman, C. (ed.). USDA For. Serv. GTR-SO-79.
12. LORENZO, A.B., AND P. BEARD. 1996. Factors affecting the decisions of NIPF owners to use assistance programs. P. 264-275 in Proc. of Symp. on Nonindustrial Private Forests: Learning from the past, prospects for the future. Minn. Ext. Serv., Univ. of Minn., St. Paul, MN.
13. LYONS, J.R. 1983. A national perspective on issues. P. 23-26 in Symp. Proc., Nonindustrial Private Forests: A review of economic and policy studies, Royer, J.P., and C.D. Risbrudt (eds.). Duke Univ., School of For. and Environ. Studies, Durham, NC.
14. PELKKI, M.H., AND E. GRACEY. 1997. NIPF management in Kentucky: Is the primacy of timber management really passé? P. 5-9 in Proc. of Southern Forest Economics Workers Meeting: Valuing non-timber forest resources: Timber primacy is passé. Kluender, R. (ed.). Arkansas Forest Resources Center, Monticello, AR.
15. PORTERFIELD, R.L., AND J.E. MOAK. 1977. Timber management for nonindustrial forest owners: A matter of perspective? South. J. Appl. For. 1(3):2-6.
16. ROYER, J.P. 1987. Reforestation tax incentives and cost-sharing in North Carolina: A question of efficiency. J. Soil Water Cons. May-June:190-193.
17. STRAKA, T.J., AND M.L. DOOLITTLE. 1988. Propensity of nonindustrial private forest landowners to regenerate following harvest: Relationship to socio-economic characteristics, including innovativeness. Resour. Manage. Opt. 6(2):121-128.
18. STRAKA, T.J., H.W. WISDOM, AND J.E. MOAK. 1984. Size of forest holding and investment behavior of nonindustrial private owners. J. For. 82(8):495-496.
19. SYSTAT. 1996. The system for statistics. SYSTAT, Inc., Chicago, IL. 753 p.
20. TICKAMYER, A.R., AND T.A. WOOD. 1998. Identifying participation in the informal economy using survey research methods. Rural Soc. 63(2):323-339.
21. TIMBER-MART SOUTH. 1998. Timber market report: Average delivered prices, 2nd quarter 1998. Daniel Warnell School of Forestry, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA. 2 p.
22. USDA FOREST SERVICE. 1998. Forest inventory and analysis data base retrieval system. Southern forest inventory and analysis: Asheville, NC. http://www.srsfia.usfs.msstate.EDU
23. WILLIAMS, R. A., T.L. WALKINGSTICK, D.E. VOTH, J. EARL, AND C.P. HITT. 1997. A characterization of the nonindustrial private forest landowners of Arkansas. Proc: Arkansas forestry forum, J. Guldin (ed.). USDA For. Serv. GTR-SRS.
24. YOUNG, R.A., M.R. REICHENBACH, AND F. PERKUHN. 1984. A survey of private nonindustrial forest owners in Illinois: A preliminary report. Agric. Exp. Sta., Univ. of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign, Dep. of For. For. Res. Rep. No. 84-2:5.
25. YOUNG, R.A., AND M.R. REICHENBACH. 1987. Factors influencing the timber harvest intentions of nonindustrial private forest owners. For. Sci. 33(2):381-393.