Superiority of canards in homing missiles

IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 740-746

  Gutman, Shaul ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY; CONSTRAINT THEORY; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC GUIDANCE SYSTEMS; MANEUVERABILITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; RANDOM PROCESSES; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

CANARDS; HOMING MISSILES;

MISSILES;

EID: 0345134698     PISSN: 00189251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2003.1238732     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Yuan, C. L. (1948) Homing and navigational courses of automatic target-seeking devices. Journal of Applied Physics, 19 (1948), 1122-1128.
2. Cottrel, R. G. (1971) Optimal intercept guidance for short-range tactical missiles. AIAA Journal, 9, 7 (1971), 1414-1415.
3. Rusnak, I., and Meir, L. (1991)Modern guidance law for high-order autopilot. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 14, 5 (1991), 1056-1058.
4. Gazit, R. (1989) Development of guidance laws for accelerating missile. M.Sc. thesis (in Hebrew), Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Technion, 1989.
5. Gutman, S. (1979)On optimal guidance for homing missiles. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 2, 4 (1979), 296-300.
6. Gutman, S. Applied min-max in guidance and control. Lecture notes, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technion, 2003.
7. Blakelock, J. H. (1991) Automatic Control of Aircraft and Missiles (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1991.