Water-Compatible Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Obtained via High-Throughput Synthesis and Experimental Design

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 49, 2003, Pages 15101-15109

  Dirion, Beate ^a   Cobb, Zoe ^b   Schillinger, Eric ^b,c   Andersson, Lars I ^b   Sellergren, Börje ^a,c  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b ASTRAZENECA R AND D   (Sweden)

^c TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; MONOCHROMATORS; MONOMERS; SOLVENTS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

SORBENTS;

POLYMERS;

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; BUPIVACAINE; MONOMER; POLYMER; SOLVENT;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING KINETICS; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHROMATOGRAPHY; CROSS LINKING; DISPERSION; EQUILIBRIUM CONSTANT; HYDROPHILICITY; MOLECULAR IMPRINTING; PH; PROTEIN BINDING; ROBOTICS; SOLID PHASE EXTRACTION; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 0345098297     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0355473     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Shea, K. J., Roberts, M. J., Yan, M., Eds. Molecularly Imprinted Materials-Sensors and other Devices; MRS Symp Proc: San Francisco, CA, 2002; Vol. 723, p M1.3.
2. Sellergren, B., Ed. Molecularly imprinted polymers. Man made mimics of antibodies and their applications in analytical chemistry; Elsevier Science BV: Amsterdam, 2001; Vol. 23.
3. Komiyama, M., Takeuchi, T., Mukawa, T., Asanuma, H., Eds. Molecular Imprinting-From Fundamentals to Applications: Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002.
4. (a) Wulff, G.; Schönfeld, R. Adv. Mater. 1998, 10, 957-959.
5. (b) Sellergren, B.; Wieschemeyer, J.; Boos, K.-S.; Seidel, D. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 4037-4046.
6. (c) Piletsky, S. A.; Andersson, H. S.; Nicholls, I. A. J. Mol. Recognit. 1998, 11, 94-97.
7. (d) Haupt, K.; Dzgoev, A.; Mosbach, K. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 628-631.
8. (e) Lübke, C.; Lübke, M.; Whitcombe, M. J.; Vulfson, E. N. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 5098-5105.
9. (f) Asanuma, H.; Hishiya, T.; Komiyama, M. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 1019-1030.
10. (g) Nakamura, S.; Takeuchi, H.; Nakamura, H.; Maeda, T. M. Trans. Mater. Res. Soc. Jpn. 1999, 24, 453-456.
11. Hart, B. R.; Shea, K. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2072-2073.
12. Striegler, S. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2349-2354.
13. Bures, P.; Huang, Y.; Oral, E.; Peppas, N. A. J. Controlled Release 2001, 72, 25-33.
14. (a) Sellergren, B. J. Chromatogr., A 1994, 673, 133-141.
15. (b) Andersson, L. I. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 111-17.
16. (c) Dauwe, C.; Sellergren, B. J. Chromatogr., A 1996, 753, 191-200.
17. Karlsson, J. G.; Andersson, L. I.; Nicholls, I. A. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 435, 57-64.
18. Nicholls, I. A.; Ramström, O.; Mosbach, K. J. Chromatogr. A 1995, 691, 349-53.
19. Lanza, F.; Sellergren, B. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 2092-2096.
20. Takeuchi, T.; Fukuma, D.; Matsui, J. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 285-290.
21. Lanza, F.; Hall, A. J.; Sellergren, B.; Bereczki, A.; Horvai, G.; S.; Cormack, P. A. G.; Sherrington, D. C. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 435, 91-106.
22. For pore size optimisation of polymeric materials, see: Viklund, C.; Pontén, E.; Glad, B.; Irgum, K.; Hörstedt, P.; Svec, F. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 463-471.
23. Lanza, F.; Sellergren, B. Adv. Chromatogr. 2001, 41, 137-173.
24. Andersson, L. I. Analyst 2000, 125, 1515-1517.
25. Oral, E.; Peppas, N. A. Polym. Prepr. 2001, 42, 111-112.
26. Sreenivasan, K. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1999, 71, 1819-1821.
27. Kugimiya, A.; Takeuchi, T.; Matsui, J.; Ikebukuro, K.; Yano, K.; Karube, I. Anal. Lett. 1996, 29, 1099-1107.
28. Turkewitsch, P.; Wandelt, B.; Darling, G. D.; Powell, W. S. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 2025-2030.
29. Sellergren, B.; Hall, A. J. In Molecularly imprinted polymers. Man made mimics of antibodies and their applications in analytical chemistry; Sellergren, B., Ed.; Elsevier Science BV: Amsterdam, 2001; Vol. 23, pp 21-57.
30. Sellergren, B.; Wieschemeyer, J.; Boos, K.-S.; Seidel, D. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 4037-4046.
31. Haginaka, J.; Sanbe, H. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 5206-5210.
32. Santora, B. P.; Gagné, M. R.; Moloy, K. G.; Radu, N. S. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 658-661.
33. A repetition of the rebinding experiment after wash and conditioning of the materials gave similar results.
34. As remarked by one reviewer, the groupwise behavior correlates with the volatility of the porogens. Thus, the poorer performance of the DCM and MTBE materials could be ascribed to partial evaporation of the porogen during polymerization. However, ligand binding results for normal scale batches corresponding to polymers 4 and 10 agreed with those of the well plate.
35. Sellergren, B.; Shea, K. J. J. Chromatogr. 1993, 635, 31.
36. The retention factors obtained in acetonitrile using MIP and NIP 9 were 0.66 and 0.054, respectively. In pure aqueous buffer BV eluted at 32 min on NIP 9 and after more than 75 min on MIP 9.
37. Sellergren, B.; Andersson, L. I. Methods Enzymol. 2000, 22, 92-106.
38. The swelling measured in acetonitrile was for MIP 9/1.19 (mL/mL) and for NIP 9/1.25 (mL/mL). The elution volume of the void marker acetonitrile after subtraction of the extracolumn volume was 13% larger for MIP 14 than for NIP 14 and 18% larger for MIP 9 than for NIP 9