|
Volumn 44, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 46-53
|
What medicine and the law should do for the physician-assisted suicide debate.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
BEHAVIOR;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LONG TERM CARE;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
PAIN;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PHYSICIAN;
QUILL V. VACCO;
RIGHT TO DIE;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
UNITED STATES;
ETHICS;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
QUILL V. VACCO;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
DOUBLE EFFECT;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
HUMANS;
INTENTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
NEW YORK;
PAIN;
PHYSICIANS;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
TERMINALLY ILL;
UNITED STATES;
WEDGE ARGUMENT;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0345070704
PISSN: 10588760
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (1)
|
References (0)
|