The Community Network Lifecycle: A Framework for Research and Action

Information Society

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 339-347

  Venkatesh, Murali ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345017071     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/714044682     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aiken, M., and Alford, R. R. 1970. Community structure and innovation: The case of urban renewal. American Sociological Review 35:650-665.
2. Archer, M. 1995. Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Beamish, A. (1999). Approaches to community computing: Bringing technology to low-income groups. In High technology in low-income communities: Prospects for the positive use of information technology, eds. D. Schon, B. Sanyal, and W. J. Mitchell. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
4. Bellah, R. N., Madsen, Richard, Sullivan, William, Swindler, Anne, and Tipton, Steven M. 1992. The good society. New York: Vintage.
5. Benson, J. K. 1975. The interorganizational network as apolitical economy. Administrative Science Quarterly 20:229-249.
6. Bijker, W. E. 1995. Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory ofsociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
7. Brint, S., and Karabel, J. 1991. Institutional origins and transformations: The case of American Community Colleges. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, eds. W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, pp. 143-163. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. 1994. Borderline issues: Social and material aspects of design. Human-Computer Interaction 9:3-36.
9. Calhoun, C. 1998. Community without propinquity revisited: Communications technology and the transformation of the urban public sphere. Sociological Inquiry 68(3):373-397.
10. Cohen, C. J. 2001. Social capital, intervening institutions, and political power. In Social capital and poor communities, eds. S. Saegert, J. P. Thompson, and M. R. Warren, pp. 267-289. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
11. DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. In Institutional patterns and organizations, ed. L. G. Zucker, pp. 3-21. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
12. DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W. 1991. Introduction. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, eds. P. J. DiMaggio &W. W. Powell, pp. 1-38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Drier, P. 1996. Community empowerment strategies: The limits and potential of community organizing in urban neighborhoods. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 2(2):121-159.
14. Flores, W. V., andBenmayor, R. 1997. Constructing cultural citizenship. In Latino cultural citizenship, eds. W. V. Flores and R. Benmayor, pp. 1-23. Boston: Beacon Press.
15. Fraser, N. 1989. Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16. Friedmann, J., and Douglass, M. 1998. Introduction. In Cities for citizens: Planning and the rise of civil society in a global age, eds. M. Douglass and J. Friedmann, pp. 1-15. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
17. Galaskiewicz, J. 1991. Making corporate actors accountable: Institution-building in Minneapolis-St. Paul. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, eds. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, pp. 293-310. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 83:1420-1443.
19. Hampton, K., and Wellman, B. 1999. Examining community in the digital neighborhood: Early results from Canada’s wired suburb. In Digital cities: Technologies, experiences, and future perspectives, eds. T. Ishida and K. Isbister, pp. 194-208. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
20. Healey, P., Cars, G., Madanipour, A., and De Magalhaes, C. 2002. Transforming governance, institutionalist analysis and institutional capacity. In Urban governance, institutional capacity, and social milieux, eds. G. Cars, P. Healey, A. Madanipour, and C. de Magalhaes, pp. 6-28. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
21. Jepperson, R. L. 1991. Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, eds. W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, pp. 143-163. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Kling, R. (1980). Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. Computing Surveys 12(1):61-110.
23. Laumann, E. O., Galaskiewicz, J., andMarsden, P. V. 1978. Community structure as interorganizational linkages. Annual Review of Sociology 4:455-484.
24. Levin, Y. 2002. Politics after the Internet. The Public Interest 149:8094.
25. Mackenzie, D. & Wajcman, J. 1985. The social shaping of technology. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
26. Melucci, A. 1996. Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Nelson, L., Ramsey, C., and Verner, C. 1960. Community structure and change. New York: The Macmillan Company.
28. Nisbet, R. A. 1962. Community and power. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. O’Brien, D. J. 1983. Neighborhood organization and interest-group process. In New perspectives on the American community, eds. R. L. Warren and L. Lyon. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
30. Pinch, T. J., and Bijker, W. 1984. The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science 14:399-441.
31. Porpora, D. V. 1989. Four concepts of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 19(2):195-211.
32. Powell, W., and DiMaggio, P. 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
33. Rubin, I. 1973. Function and structure of community: Conceptual and theoretical analysis. In Perspectives on the American community: A book of readings, ed. R. L. Warren, pp. 456-466. Chicago: Rand McNally.
34. Schuler, D. 1996. New community networks: Wired for change. New York: ACM Press.
35. Selznick, P. 1996. In search of community. In Rooted inthe land: Essays on community and place, eds. W. Vitek and W. Jackson, pp. 195-203. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36. Tonkiss, F. 2000. Social justice and the city: Equity, cohesion, and the politics of space. In A companion to the city, eds. G. Bridge and S. Watson, pp. 591-598. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
37. Walton, J. 1973. Differential patterns of community power structure. In Perspectives on the American community: A book of readings, ed. R. L. Warren, pp. 175-187. Chicago: Rand McNally.
38. Warren, R. L. 1978. The community in America, 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
39. Warren, R. L. 1999. Foreword to the community in urban society. pp. vii-ix. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
40. Wellman, B. 1997. Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In Social structures: A network approach, eds. B. Wellman and S. D. Berkowitz, pp. 19-61. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
41. Wilson, J. Q. 1973. Planning and politics: Citizen participation in urban renewal. In Perspectives on the American community: A book of readings, ed. R. L. Warren, pp. 352-364. Chicago: Rand McNally.
42. Winner, L. 1985. Do artifacts have politics? In The social shaping of technology, eds. D. Mackenzie and J. Wajcman, pp. 26-38. Milton