Board Composition, Committees, and Organizational Efficiency: The Case of Nonprofits

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 493-520

  Callen, Jeffrey L ^a   Klein, April ^b   Tinkelman, Daniel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PACE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Committees; Nonprofit governance; Organizational efficiency

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345016428     PISSN: 08997640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0899764003257462     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 377-397.
2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (1987). Accounting for joint costs of informational materials and activities of not-for-profit organizations that include a fundraising appeal. Statement of Position 87-2. New York: Author.
3. Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. N. (1985). Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1, 101-124.
4. Ben Ner, A., & Van Hoomissen, T. (1993). Aportrait of the nonprofit sector in the mixed economy: New York 1981-1987. In A. Ben Ner & B. Gui (Eds.), The nonprofit sector in the mixed economy. East Lansing: University of Michigan Press.
5. Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (1999). The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. Business Lawyer, 54, 921-963.
6. Bradshaw, P., Murray, V., & Wolpin, J. (1992). Do nonprofit boards make a difference? An exploration of the relationship among board structure, process, and effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21, 227-249.
7. Callen, J. L. (1994). Money donations, volunteering and organizational efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 5, 215-228.
8. Callen, J. L., & Falk, H. (1993). Agency and efficiency in nonprofit organizations: The case of "specific health focus" charities. The Accounting Review, 68, 48-65.
9. Crittenden, W. F. (2000). Spinning straw into gold: The tenuous strategy, funding, and financial performance linkage. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29 (Suppl.), 164-182.
10. D'Aunno, T. (1992). The effectiveness of human service organizations: A comparison of models. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (pp. 341-361). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 301-326.
12. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (1993). Financial statements of not-for-profit organizations. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 117. Stamford, CT: Author.
13. Forbes, D. (1998). Measuring the unmeasurable: Empirical studies of nonprofit organization effectiveness from 1977 to 1997. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 183-202.
14. Froelich, K. A., & Knoepfle, T. W. (1996). Internal Revenue Service 990 data: Fact or fiction? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 40-52.
15. Froelich, K. A., Knoepfle, T. W., & Pollak, T. H. (2000). Financial measures in nonprofit organization research: Comparing IRS 990 return and audited financial statement data. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 232-254.
16. Green, J. C., & Griesinger, D. W. (1996). Board performance and organizational effectiveness in nonprofit social service organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6, 381-402.
17. Grimes, A. J. (1977). The fund raising percentage as a quantitative standard for regulation of public charities, with particular emphasis on voluntary health and welfare organizations. In U.S. Department of the Treasury (Eds.), Research papers sponsored by the commission on private philanthropy and public needs (pp. 2889-2913). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Treasury.
18. Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89, 835-901.
19. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management, 20, 101-112.
20. Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1997). Multiple constituencies and the social construction of nonprofit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26, 185-206.
21. Klein, A. (1998). Firm performance and board committee structure. Journal of Law & Economics, 41, 275-303.
22. Letts, C. W., Ryan, W. P., & Grossman, A. (1998), High performance nonprofit organizations: Managing upstream for greater impact. New York: John Wiley.
23. MacAvoy, P. W., Cantor, S., Dana, J., & Peck, S. (1983). Proposals for increased control of the corporation by the board of directors: An economic analysis. In Business Roundtable (Eds.), Statement of the business roundtable on the American Law Institute's proposed principles of corporate governance and structure: Restatement and recommendations (pp. C1-C49). New York: Business Roundtable.
24. Miller, L. E., Weiss, R. M., & MacLeod, B. V. (1988). Boards of directors in nonprofit organizations: Composition, activities, and organizational outcomes. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 17, 81-89.
25. Molinari, C., Morlock, L., Alexander, J., & Lyles, C. A. (1993). Hospital board effectiveness: Relationships between governing board composition and hospital financial viability. Health Services Research, 28, 357-377.
26. Murray, V., & Cutt, J. (2000, April 6-7). An overview of the rhetoric and reality on organizational performance evaluation by nonprofit boards. Paper presented at the conference of Innovation, Change and Continuity in Nonprofit Organization Governance, Midwest Center for Nonprofit Leadership, Kansas City, MO.
27. Murray, V., & Tassie, R. (1994), Evaluating the effectiveness of nonprofit organizations. In Robert D. Herman (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (pp. 303-324). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. New York State Office of the Attorney General. (1998). Where the Money Goes - The AG's Report for 1997. Retrieved July 31, 2003, from http://www.oag.state.nys.us
29. New York State Office of the Attorney General. (1999). Where the Money Goes - The AG's Report for 1998. Retrieved July 31, 2003, from http://www.oag.state.nys.us
30. Olson, D. E. (2000). Agency theory in the not-for-profit sector: Its role at independent colleges. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 280-296.
31. Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, composition and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization-environment linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 349-364.
32. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
33. Plambeck, D. L. (1985). The implication of board member composition for fundraising success. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 14, 60-66.
34. Posnett, J., & Sandler, T. (1989). Demand for charity donations in private nonprofit markets: The case of the U.K. Journal of Public Economics, 40, 187-200.
35. Price, J. L. (1963). The impact of governing boards on organizational effectiveness and morale. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8, 361-378.
36. Provan, K. G. (1980). Board power and organizational effectiveness among human services agencies. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 221-236.
37. Shivdasani, A., & Yermack, D. (1999). CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 54, 1829-1853.
38. Siciliano, J. (1990). Strategic management and the board of directors: A survey of YMCA organizations in the Eastern U.S. and Canada (Working paper). University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
39. Slesinger, L. H., & Moyers, R. L. (1995). A snapshot of America's nonprofit boards: Results of a national survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Nonprofit Boards.
40. Stone, M. M., Bigelow, B., & Crittenden, W. (1999). Research on strategic management in nonprofit organizations. Administration and Society, 13, 378-405.
41. Stout, W. D. (1997). Materiality and nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation of materiality thresholds of financial statement users. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida.
42. Tinkelman, D. (1996). An empirical study of the effect of accounting disclosures upon donations to nonprofit organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
43. Tinkelman, D. (1998). Differences in sensitivity of financial statement users to joint cost allocations: The case of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 13, 377-394.
44. Tinkelman, D. (1999). Factors affecting the relation between donations to not-for-profit organizations and an efficiency ratio. Research in Government and Nonprofit Accounting, 10, 135-161.
45. Weisbrod, B. A., & Dominguez, N. D. (1986). Demand for collective goods in private markets: Can fundraising expenditures help overcome free-rider behavior? Journal of Public Economics, 30, 83-96.
46. Widmer, C. (1993). Role conflict, role ambiguity, and role overload on boards of directors of nonprofit human services organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22, 339-356.
47. Williamson, O. E. (1983). Organization form, residual claimants, and corporate control. Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 351-366.
48. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185-212.
49. Young, G. R., Beekun, I. & Ginn, G. O. (1992). Governing board structure, business strategy, and performance of acute care hospitals: A contingency perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 543-564.
50. Zald, M. N. (1967). Urban differentiation, characteristics of boards of directors and organizational effectiveness. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 261-272.