Stimulus symmetry affects the bisection of figures but not lines: Evidence from event-related fMRI

NeuroImage

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 1756-1764

  Wilkinson, David T ^a,c   Halligan, Peter W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CINGULATE GYRUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0344983748     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anderson B. A mathematical model of line bisection behaviour in neglect. Brain. 119:1996;841-850.
2. Barlow H.B., Reeves B.C. The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays. Vision Res. 19:1979;783-793.
3. Baylis G.C., Driver J. Parallel computation of symmetry but not repetition within single visual shapes. Visual Cogn. 1:1994;377-400.
4. Briggs G.G., Nebes R.D. Patterns of hand preference in a student population. Cortex. 11:1975;230-238.
5. Corbetta M., Miezin F.M., Dobmeyer S., Shulman G.L., Petersen S. Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, colour and speed Functional anatomy by positron emission tomography . J. Neurosci. 12:1991;2383-2402.
6. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L., Miezin F.M., Petersen S.E. A PET study of visuospatial attention. J. Neurosci. 13:1993;1202-1226.
7. Dakin S.C., Herbert A.M. The spatial region of integration for visual symmetry detection. Proc. R. Soc. London B. Ser. 265:1998;659-664.
8. Doricchi F., Galati G. Implicit semantic evaluation of object symmetry and contralesional visual denial in a case of left unilateral neglect with damage of the dorsal paraventricular white matter. Cortex. 36:2000;337-350.
9. Driver J., Baylis G.C., Rafal R.D. Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect. Nature. 360:1992;73-75.
10. Ferber S., Karnath H.O. How to assess spatial neglect - line bisection or cancellation tasks? J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 23:2001;599-607.
11. Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Weiss P.H., Shah N.J., Toni I., Halligan P.W., Zilles K. 'Where' depends on 'what'. A differential functional anatomy for position discrimination in one-versus two-dimensions. Neuropsychologia. 38:2000;1741-1748.
12. Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Weiss P.H., Toni I., Zilles K. Task instructions influence the cognitive strategies involved in line bisection judgments evidence form modulated neural mechanisms revealed by fMRI . Neuropsychologia. 40:2002;119-130.
13. Forman S.D., Cohen J.D., Fitzgerald M., Eddy W.F., Mintun M.A., Noll D.C. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) use of a cluster size threshold . Magn. Reson. Med. 22:1995;636-647.
14. Friston K.J., Worsley K.J., Frackowiak R.S.J., Mazziotta J.C., Evans A.C. Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1:1992;214-220.
15. Halligan P.W., Marshall J.C. Figural modulation of visuo-spatial neglect a case study . Neuropsychologia. 19:1991;619-628.
16. Jenkinson M., Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med. Image Anal. 5:2001;143-156.
17. Karnath H.O., Ferber S., Himmelbach M. Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature. 411:2001;950-953.
18. Logan G.D., Compton B.J. Distance and distraction effects in the apprehension of spatial relations. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22:1996;159-172.
19. Luria A.R. The Working Brain An Introduction to Neuropsychology . 1973;Basic Books, New York.
20. Mesulam M. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann. Neurol. 10:1981;309-325.
21. Mesulam M. Spatial attention and neglect parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events . Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B. Ser. 354:1999;1325-1346.
22. Milner A.D., Brechmann M., Pagliarini L. To halve and to halve not an analysis of line bisection judgments in normal subjects . Neuropsychologia. 30:1992;515-526.
23. Milner A.D., Harvey M., Roberts R.C., Forster S.V. Line bisection errors in visual neglect misguided action or size distortion? Neuropsychologia. 31:1993;39-349.
24. Nobre A.C., Sebestyen G.N., Gitelman D.R., Mesulam M., Frackiowiak R.S.J., Frith C.D. Functional localization of the system for visuo-spatial attention using positron emission tomography. Brain. 120:1997;515-533.
25. Norman D.A., Shallice T. Attention to action willed and automatic control of behaviour . Davidson R.J., Schwartz G.E., Shapiro D. Consciousness and Self Regulation Advances in Research and Theory . 1986;Plenum, New York.
26. Pashler H. Coordinate frames for symmetry detection and object recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 16:1990;150-163.
27. Peterson B.S., Skudlarski P., Gatenby J.C., Zhang H., Anderson A.W., Gore J.C. An fMRI study of Stroop word-colour interference evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems . Biol. Psychiatry. 45:1999;1237-1258.
28. Rainville S.J.M., Kingdom F.A.A. The functional role of oriented spatial filters in the perception of mirror symmetry - psychophysics and modeling. Vision Res. 40:2000;2621-2644.
29. Riestra A.R., Womack K.B., Crucian G.P., Heilman K.M. Is the middle between both halves? Midpoint location and segment size estimation in neglect. Neurology. 59:2002;1580-1584.
30. Royer F.L. Detection of symmetry. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percep. Perform. 7:1981;1186-1210.
31. Saarinen J. Detection of mirror symmetry in random dot patterns at different eccentricities. Vision Res. 288:1988;755-759.
32. Smith, S. 2002. FMRIB Expert Analysis Tool. FMRIB Software Library, Release 3.0. The University of Oxford.
33. Sternberg S. The discovery of processing stages extension of Donder's method . Acta Psychol. 30:1969;276-315.
34. Talairach J., Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. 1988;Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart.
35. Thornhill R., Gangestad S.W. Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cogn. Sci. 3:(12):1999;452-460.
36. Watson R.T., Heilman K.M., Cauthen J.C., King F.A. Neglect after cingulectomy. Neurology. 23:1973;1003-1007.
37. Wilkinson D.T., Halligan P.W. The effects of stimulus symmetry on landmark judgments in left and right visual fields. Neuropsychologia. 40:2002;1045-1058.
38. Woolrich M.W., Ripley B.D., Brady J.M., Smith S.M. Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modelling of FMRI. NeuroImage. 14:2001;1370-1386.
39. Worsley K.J., Evans A.C., Marrett S., Neelin P. A three dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 12:1992;900-918.