Growth of mixed cultures on mixtures of substitutable substrates: The operating diagram for a structured model

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 226, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 143-157

  Reeves, Gregory T ^a   Narang, Atul ^b   Pilyugin, Sergei S ^c  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

^b University of Florida   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Coexistence; Mathematical model; Microbial growth; Mixed cultures; Mixed substrate; Substitutable substrates

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; SUBSTRATE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COCULTURE; COMMENSALISM; COMPETITIVE ABILITY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CULTURE MEDIUM; FLOW RATE; GEOMETRY; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIAL GROWTH; MIXED CELL CULTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; SIMULATION; SPECIES COMPARISON; STEADY STATE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 0344983303     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00280-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Andersen B., von Meyenburg K. Are growth rates of bacteria in batch cultures limited by respiration? J. Bacteriol. 144:1980;114-123.
2. Aris R., Humphrey A.E. Dynamics of a chemostat in which two organisms compete for a common substrate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 19:1977;1375-1386.
3. Chian S.K., Mateles R.I. Growth of mixed cultures on mixed substrates. Appl. Microbiol. 16:1968;1337-1342.
4. Egli T. The ecological and physiological significance of the growth of heterotrophic microorganisms with mixtures of substrates. Adv. Microbiol. Ecol. 14:1995;305-386.
5. Fredrickson A.G., Stephanopoulos G. Microbial competition. Science. 213:1981;972-979.
6. Fredrickson A.G. Behavior of mixed cultures of microorganisms. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 31:1977;63-87.
7. Fredrickson A.G., Tsuchiya H.M. Microbial kinetics and dynamics. Lapidus L., Amundson N.R. Chemical Reactor Theory: A Review. 1977;405-483 Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. (Chapter 7).
8. Gottschal J.C. Mixed substrate utilization by mixed cultures. Poindexter J.S., Leadbetter E.R. Bacteria in Nature. 1986;261-292 Plenum Press, New York.
9. Gottschal J.C. Growth kinetics and competition - some contemporaneous comments. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 63:1993;299-313.
10. Hansen S.R., Hubbell S.P. Single nutrient microbial competition: agreement between experimental and theoretical forecast outcomes. Science. 207:1980;1491-1493.
11. Harder W., Dijkhuizen L. Mixed substrate utilization. Dean A.C.R., Ellwood D.C., Evans C.G.T., Melling J. Continuous Culture 6: Applications and New Fields. 1976;297-314 Ellis Horwood, Chichester. (Chapter 23).
12. Harder W., Dijkhuizen L. Strategies of mixed substrate utilization in microorganisms. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B. 297:1982;459-480.
13. Harrison D.E.F., Wren S.J. Mixed microbial cultures as a basis for future fermentation processes. Process Biochem. 11:1976;30-32.
14. Hutchinson G.E. The paradox of the plankton. Am. Nat. 95:1961;137-145.
15. Ingraham J.L., Neidhardt F.C., Maalœ O. Growth of the Bacterial Cell. 1983;Frank Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
16. Ingram L.O., Aldrich H.C., Borges A.C.C., Causey T.B., Martinez A., Morales F., Saleh A., Underwood S.A., Yomano L.P., York S.W.et al. Enteric bacterial catalysts for fuel ethanol production. Biotechnol. Prog. 15:1999;855-866.
17. Kim S.U., Dhurjati P. Analysis of two interacting bacterial populations with opposite substrate preferences. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 29:1986;1015-1023.
18. Kuznetsov, Y.A., 1998. CONTENT - Integrated environment for analysis of dynamical systems.
19. León J.A., Tumpson D.B. Competition between two species for two complementary or substitutable resources. J. Theor. Biol. 50:1975;185-201.
20. Muller S., Losche A., Mertingk H., Beisker W., Babel W. Flow cytometric monitoring of Rhodococcus erythropolis and Ochrobactrum anthropi in a mixed culture. Acta Biotechnol. 20:2000;219-233.
21. Narang A. The steady states of microbial growth on mixtures of substitutable substrates in a chemostat. J. Theor. Biol. 190:1998;241-261.
22. Narang A. The dynamical analogy between microbial growth on mixtures of substrates and population growth of competing species. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 59:1998;116-121.
23. Narang A., Konopka A., Ramkrishna D. The dynamics of microbial growth on mixtures of substrates in batch reactors. J. Theor. Biol. 184:1997;301-317.
24. Pavlou S., Fredrickson A.G. Growth of microbial populations in nonminimal media: some considerations for modeling. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 34:1989;971-980.
25. Phillips O.M. The equilibrium and stability of simple marine biological systems. I. Primary nutrient consumers. Am. Nat. 107:1973;73-93.
26. Porter J., Pickup R.W. Nucleic acid-based fluorescent probes in microbial ecology: application of flow cytometry. J. Microbiol. Meth. 42:2000;75-79.
27. Powell E.O. Criteria for the growth of contaminants and mutants in continuous culture. J. Gen. Microbiol. 18:1958;259-268.
28. Rogers J.B., DuTeau N.M., Reardon K.R. Use of 16S-RNA to investigate microbial population dynamics during biodegradation of toluence and phenol by a binary culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 70:2000;436-445.
29. Tilman D. Resource competition between planktonic algae: an experimental and theoretical approach. Ecology. 58:1977;338-348.
30. Wolfram S. The Mathematica book. 4th Edition:1999;Wolfram-Media, Champaign, IL.