An affine invariant deformable shape representation for general curves

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages 1142-1149

  Ericsson, A ^a   Astrom K ^a  

^a LUND INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

AFFINE INVARIANT DEFORMABLE SHAPE REPRESENTATION; DESCRIPTION LENGTH OF THE MODEL; SHAPE VARIATION;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 0344983282     PISSN: 15505499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2003.1238477     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. H. Aanaes and F. Kahl. Estimation of deformable structure and motion. In Workshop on Vision and Modelling of Dynamic Scenes, ECCV'02, 2002.
2. A. Baumberg and Hogg D. Learning flexible models from image sequences. In Proc. European Conf. on Computer Vision, ECCV'94, pages 299-308, 1994.
3. A. Benayoun, Ayache N., and Cohen I. Adaptive meshes and nonrigid motion computation. In Proc. International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR'94, pages 730-732, 1994.
4. K. Berthilsson, R. Astrom. Extensions of affine shape. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 2(11): 119-136, 1999.
5. F.L. Bookstein. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: Morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis, 3:225-243, 1999.
6. T.F. Cootes, A. Hill, C.J. Taylor, and Haslam J. The use of active shape models for locating structure in medical images. IEEE Trans. medical imaging, 12(6):355-365, 1994.
7. T.F. Cootes and C.J. Taylor. Statistical Models of Appearance for Computer Vision. University of Manchester, 2001.
8. Rhodri H. Davies, Tim F. Cootes, and Chris J. Taylor. A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling. In Information Processing in Medical Imaging, 2001.
9. Rhodri H. Davies, Carole J. Twining, Tim F. Cootes, John C. Waterton, and Chris J. Taylor. A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling. IEEE Trans. medical imaging, 21(5):525-537, 2002.
10. Ian L. Dryden and Kanti V. Mardia. Statistical Shape Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
11. N Dunford and J. T. Schwarz. Linear operators. Spectral theory, 2. Interscience, 1963.
12. A. Hill and C. J. Taylor. Automatic landmark generation for point distribution models. In Proc. British Machine Vision Conference, pages 429-438, 1994.
13. C. Kambhamettu and D.B. Goldgof. Points correspondences recovery in non-rigid motion. In Proc. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR'92, pages 222-237, 1992.
14. A. Kelemen, G. Szekely, and Gerig G. Elastic model-based segmentation of 3d neuroradiological data sets. IEEE Trans. medical imaging, 18(10):828-839, 1999.
15. A.C.W. Kotcheff and C. J. Taylor. Automatic construction of eigenshape models by direct optimization. Medical Image Analysis, 2:303-314. 1998.
16. T. Sebastian, P. Klein, and B. Kimia. Constructing 2d curve atlases. In IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, pages 70-77, 2000.
17. G. Sparr. Projective invariants for affine shapes of point configurations. In Proceedings ESPRIT-DARPA Invariants Workshop, 1991.
18. G. Sparr. A common framework for kinetic depth, reconstruction and motion for deformable objects. In Proc. European Conf. on Computer Vision, ECCV'94, volume 801, pages 471-482. Springer-Verlag, 1994.
19. G. Sparr. Structure and motion from kinetic depth. Technical Report ISRN LUTFD2/TFMA-95/7016-SE, Dept of Mathematics, Lund Institute of Technology, 1995. in Proc of the Sophus Lie International Workshop on Computer Vision and Applied Geometry.
20. H.D. Tagare. Shape-based nonrigid correspondence with application to heart motion analysis. IEEE Trans. medical imaging, 18:570-579, 1999.
21. H. H. Thodberg. Minimum description length shape and appearance models. Technical Report IMM Technical Report 2003-1, Technical University of Denmark, 2003.
22. Y. Wang, B.S. Peterson, and L.H Staib. Shape-based 3d surface correspondence using geodesics and local geometry. In Proc. Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR'00, pages 644-651, 2000.