Probabilistic bilinear models for appearance-based vision

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages 1478-1485

  Grimes, D B ^a   Shon, A P ^a   Rao, R P N ^a  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

APPEARANCE-BASED VISION; PROBABILISTIC BILINEAR MODEL;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 0344982976     PISSN: 15505499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2003.1238665     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. A. J. Bell and T. J. Sejnowski. The 'independent components' of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research, 37 (23):3327-3338, 1997.
2. J. L. Bentley. Multidimensional divide and conquer. Comm. ACM, 23(4):214-219, 1980.
3. F. De la Torre and M. Black. Robust principal component analysis for computer vision. In ICCV '01, volume I, pages 362-369, 2001.
4. N. J. Gordon, D. J. Salmond, and A. F. M. Smith. Novel approach to nonlinear/non-gaussian bayesian state estimation. IEE Proceedings on Radar and Signal Processing, 140:107-113, 1993.
5. D. B. Grimes and R. P. N. Rao. A bilinear model for sparse coding. In S. Becker, S. Thrun, and K. Obermayer, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15, Cambridge, MA, 2003. The MIT Press.
6. M. Isard and A. Blake. Condensation - conditional density propagation for visual tracking. International Journal of Computer Vision, 29(1):5-28, 1998.
7. N. Jojic and B. Frey. Topographic transformation as a discrete latent variable. In S. A. Solla, T. K. Leen, and K.-R. Müller, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 12. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
8. S. K. Murase and S. K. Nayar. Visual learning and recognition of 3-D objects from appearance. International Journal of Computer Vision, 14(1):5-24, 1995.
9. B. A. Olshausen and D. J. Field. Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? Vision Research, 37:3311-3325, 1997.
10. S. M. Omohundro. Bumptrees for efficient function, constraint, and classification learning. In R. Lippmann, J. Moody, and D. Touretzky, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 3, pages 693-699. 1991.
11. A. Pentland, B. Moghaddam, and T. Starner. View-based and modular eigenspaces for face recognition. In CVPR '94, pages 84-90, 1994.
12. D. B. Rubin. Using the SIR algorithm to simulate posterior distributions. In M. Bernardo, K. DeGroot, D. Lindley, and A. Smith, editors, Bayesian Statistics 3. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1988.
13. B. Schiele and A. Pentland. Probabilistic object recognition and localization. In ICCV '99, volume I, pages 177-182, 1999.
14. J. B. Tenenbaum and W. T. Freeman. Separating style and content with bilinear models. Neural Computation, 12(6):1247-1283, 2000.
15. S. Thrun, J. C. Langford, and D. Fox. Monte Carlo hidden Markov models: Learning non-parametric models of partially observable stochastic processes. In Proc. 16th International Conf. on Machine Learning, pages 415-424. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1999.
16. M. Turk and A. Pentland. Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3:71-86, 1991.