Empirical methods to compensate for a view-angle-dependent brightness gradient in AVIRIS imagery

Remote Sensing of Environment

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 277-291

  Robert, E Kennedy ^c   Warren, B Cohen ^b   Gen, Takao ^a  

^a NATIONAL VETERINARY ASSAY LABORATORY   (Japan)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; INFRARED SPECTROMETERS; MAPPING; MONITORING;

BRIGHTNESS GRADIENT; FORESTED REGIONS;

REMOTE SENSING;

AVIRIS; BIDIRECTIONAL REFLECTANCE; BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE; SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE; VIEW ANGLE EFFECT;

EID: 0344972106     PISSN: 00344257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00111-9     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abuelgasim, A. A., and Strahler, A. H. (1994), Modeling bidirectional radiance measurements collected by the Advanced Solid-State Array Spectroradiometer (ASAS) over Oregon Transect Conifer Forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 47:261-275.
2. Brown, R. J., Bernier, M., and Fedosojevs, G. (1982), Geometrical and atmospheric considerations of NOAA AVHRR imagery. In 1982 Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data Symposium, Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, IN, pp. 374-381.
3. Cihlar, J., Manak, D., and Voisin, N. (1994), AVHRR bidirectional reflectance effects and compositing. Remote Sens. Environ. 48:77-88.
4. Daughtry, C. S. T., Biehl, L. L., and Ranson, K. J. (1989), A new technique to measure the spectral properties of conifer needles. Remote Sens. Environ. 27:81-91.
5. Deering, D. W., Middleton, E. M., and Eck, T. F. (1994), Reflectance anisotropy for a spruce-hemlock forest canopy. Remote Sens. Environ. 47:242-260.
6. Gao, B.-C., Heidchrecht, K. A., and Goetz, A. F. H. (1993), Derivation of scaled surface reflectance from AVIRIS data. Remote Sens. Environ. 44(2): 165-178.
7. Grier, C. C., and Logan, R. S. (1977), Old-growth Douglas fir communities of a western Oregon watershed: biomass distribution and production budgets. Ecol. Monogr. 47(4): 373-400.
8. Hugli, H., and Frei, W. (1981), Correcting for anisotropic reflectances in remotely sensed images from mountainous terrains. In 1981 Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data Symposium, Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, IN, pp. 363-374.
9. Irons, J. R., and Labovitz, M. L. (1982), A data analytic approach to look-angle radiance adjustment. J. Appl. Photogr. Eng. 8(3):128-137.
10. Irons, J. R., Johnson, B. L., Jr., and Linebaugh, G. H. (1987), Multiple-angle observations of reflectance anisotropy from an airborne linear array sensor. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. GE-25(3):372-383.
11. Irons, J. R., Ranson, K. J., Williams, D. L., Irish, R. R., and Huegel, F. G. (1991), An off-nadir-pointing imaging spectroradiometer for terrestrial ecosystem studies. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 29(1):66-74.
12. Johnson, L. F. (1994), Multiple view zenith angle observations of reflectance from ponderosa pine stands. Int. J. Remote Sens. 15(18):3859-3865.
13. Kimes, D. S. (1983), Dynamics of directional reflectance factor distributions for vegetation canopies. Appl. Opt. 22(9): 1364-1372.
14. Kimes, D. S., Newcomb, W. W., Nelson, R. F., and Schutt. J. B. (1986), Directional reflectance distributions of a hardwood and pine forest canopy. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. GE-24(2):281-293.
15. Kleman, J. (1987), Directional reflectance factor distributions for two forest canopies. Remote Sens. Environ. 23:83-96.
16. Kriebel, K. T. (1978), Measured spectral bidirectional reflec-tion properties of four vegetated surfaces. Appl. Opt. 17(2):253-259.
17. Leckie, D. G. (1987), Factors affecting defoliation assessment using airborne multispectral scanner data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 53(12):1665-1674.
18. Leckie, D. G., Beaubein, J., Gibson, J. R., O'Neill, N. T., Piekutowski, T., and Joyce, S. P. (1995), Data processing and analysis for MIFUGAM: a trial of MEIS imagery for forest inventory mapping. Can. J. Remote Sens. 21(3):337-356.
19. Li, X., and Strahler, A. H. (1986), Geometric-optical bidirectional reflectance modeling of a conifer forest canopy. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. GE-24(6):906-919.
20. Martin, M. E. (1994), Measurements of foliar chemistry using laboratory and airborne high spectral resolution visible and infrared data, Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Hampshire.
21. Martin, M. E., Newman, S. D., Aber, J. D., and Congalton, R. (1996), Determining forest species composition using high spectral resolution remote sensing data. In Summaries of the Sixth Annual JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop (R. O. Green, Ed.), Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.
22. Nalepka, R. F., and Morgenstern, J. P. (1972), Signature extension techniques applied to multispectral scanner data. In Proc. of the Eighth Int. Symp. on Remote Sens, of Environ., 2-6 Oct. 1972. Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Vol. II, pp. 881-893.
23. Norman, J. M., Welles, J. M., and Walter, E. A. (1985), Contrasts among bidirectional reflectance of leaves, canopies, and soils. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. GE-23(5): 659-667.
24. Qi, J., Moran, M. S., Cabot, F., and Dedieu, G. (1995), Normalization of sun/view angle effects using spectral albedobased vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 52:207-217.
25. Ranson, K. J., Biehl, L. L., and Bauer, M. E. (1985), Variations in spectral response of soybeans with respect to illumination, view, and canopy geometry. Int. J. Remote Sens. 6(12):1827-1842.
26. Ranson, K. J., Irons, J. R., and Williams, D. L. (1994), Multispectral bidirectional reflectance of northern forest canopies with the advanced solid-state array spectroradiometer (ASAS). Remote Sens. Environ. 47:276-289.
27. Royer, A., Vincent, P., and Bonn, F. (1985), Evaluation and correction of viewing angle effects on satellite measurements of bidirectional reflectance. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 51(12):1899-1914.
28. Staenz., K., Ahern, F. J., and Brown, R. J. (1981), The influence of illumination and viewing geometry on the reflectance factor of agricultural targets. In Proc. of the Fifteenth Int. Symp. on Remote Sens. of Environ., 11-15 May 1981, Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 867-882.
29. Staenz, K., Meyer, P., Itten, K. I., Goodenough, D. G., and Teillet, P. M., (1986), Viewing angle corrections of airborne multispectral scanner data acquired over forested surfaces. In Proc. of ICARSS 1986 Symposium, European Space Agency Pub. Div., Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp. 671-676.
30. Teillet, P. M., Goodenough, D. G., Fedosejevs, G., Byers, R., and Marjama, L. (1985), Radiometrie limitations to thematic mapper image information content. In Proc. of ACSM-ASPRS Fall Convention, Indianapolis, IN, ACSM and ASPRS, Falls Church, VA, pp. 892-901.
31. Treitz, P. M., Howarth, P. J., and Leckie, D. G. (1985), The capabilities of two airborne multispectral sensors for classifying coniferous forest species. In Proc. of the Nineteenth Int. Symp. on Remote Sens. of Environ., 21-25 Oct. 1985. Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 335-350.
32. Vane, G., Green, R. O., Chrien, T. G., Enmark, H. T., Hansen, E. G., and Porter, W. M. (1983). The Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS). Remote Sens. Environ. 44(2/3):127-144.
33. Walthall, G. L., Norman, J. M., Welles, J. M., Campbell, G., and Blad, B. L. (1985), Simple equation to approximate the bidirectional reflectance from vegetative canopies and bare soil surfaces. Appl. Opt. 24(3):383-387.
34. Williams, D. L. (1991), A comparison of spectral reflectance properties at the needle, branch, and canopy level for selected conifer species. Remote Sens. Environ. 35:79-93.