Agonistic behaviour and feather pecking in single-sexed and mixed groups of laying hens

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 62, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 219-231

  Oden K ^a   Vestergaard, K S ^b   Algers, B ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Agonistic behaviour; Feather pecking; Laying hens; Males

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344958712     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00226-3     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Algers B., Ekstrand C., Geismar J., Gunnarsson S., Odén K., Onila M., Svedberg J. Utvärdering av Oli-volétage inhysningssytem för värphöns. Swedish Univ. of Agric. Sci., Skara, Specialarbete. 31:1995;1-35. Summary is in English.
2. Al-Rawi B., Craig J.V. Agonistic behaviour of caged chickens related to group size and area per bird. Applied Animal Ethology. 2:1975;69-80.
3. Altman, D.G., 1994. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall, London.
4. Appleby M.C., Hogarth G.S., Anderson J.A., Hughes B.O., Whittemore C.T. Performance of a deep litter system for egg production. British Poultry Science. 29:1988;735-751.
5. Appleby M.C., Hughes B.O., Hogarth G.S. Behaviour of laying hens in a deep litter house. British Poultry Science. 30:1989;545-553.
6. Blokhuis, H.J., 1989. The development and causation of feather pecking in the domestic fowl, Dissertation. Spelderholt Institute for Poultry Research and Extension, Agricultural University of Wageningen.
7. Bölter, U., 1987. Felduntersuchungen zum Sozialverhalten von Hühnern in der Auslauf-und Volierenhaltung, Dissertation. Eidg. Techn. Hochschule., Zürich/ Justus-Liebig-Univ. Giessen.
8. Brown, J.L., 1975. The Evolution of Behaviour. W.W. Norton, New York.
9. Bshary R., Lamprecht J. Reduction of aggression among domestic hens (Gallus domesticus) in the presence of a dominant third party. Behaviour. 128(3-4):1994;311-324.
10. Christian J.J. Social subordination, population density and mammalian evolution. Science. 168:1970;84-90.
11. Collias N.E., Collias E.C. A field-study of the red junglefowl in North-Central India. The Condor. 69:1967;360-386.
12. Craig J.V. Behavioural and genetic adaption of laying hens to high-density environments. BioScience. 32(1):1982;33-37.
13. Craig J.V., Bhagwat A.L. Agonistic and mating behaviour of adult chickens modified by social and physical environments. Applied Animal Ethology. 1:1974;57-65.
14. Craig J.V., Biswas D.K., Guhl A.M. Agonistic behaviour influenced by strangeness, crowding and heredity in female domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour. 17:1969;498-506.
15. Cuthbertson G.J. Genetic variation in feather-pecking behaviour. British Poultry Science. 21:1980;447-450.
16. Eisenberg J.F. A comparative study in rodent ethology with emphasis on the evolution of social behaviour. Proc. US Natl. Mus. 122:1967;1-51.
17. Guhl A.M. Heterosexual dominance and mating behaviour in chickens. Behaviour. 2:1949;106-120.
18. Guhl A.M. Social behaviour of the domestic fowl. Technical Bulletin of the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. 73:1953;1-48.
19. Guhl A.M., Ortman L.L. Visual patterns in the recognition of individuals among chickens. The Condor. 55:1953;287-298.
20. Guhl A.M., Collias N.E., Allee W.C. Mating behaviour and the social hierarchy in small flocks of white leghorns. Physiological Zoology. 18:1945;365-390.
21. Gunnarsson S., Odén K., Algers B., Svedberg J., Keeling L. Poultry health and behaviour in a tiered system for loose housed layers. Swedish Univ. of Agric. Sci., Skara, Report. 35:1995;1-110.
22. Hill, J.A., 1983. Aviary systems poses feather pecking and floor egg problems. Poultry International (May) 109-113.
23. Hoffmeyer I. Feather pecking in pheasants - an ethological approach to the problem. Danish Review of Game Biol. 6:1969;1-36.
24. Hughes B.O., Duncan I.J.H. The influence of strain and environmental factors upon feather pecking and cannibalism in fowls. British Poultry Science. 13:1972;525-547.
25. Hughes B.O., Wood-Gush D.G.M., Morley Jones R. Spatial organization in flocks of domestic fowls. Animal Behaviour. 22:1974;438-445.
26. Johnsen, P.F., Vestergaard, K.S., Nørgaard-Nielsen, G., 1998. Influence of early rearing conditions on the development of feather pecking and cannibalism in domestic fowl, Accepted for publication.
27. Kathle J., Braastad B.O., Langstrand H. Non-beaked laying hens housed in aviaries: II. Behaviour of cockerels and their effect of hen performance. Norwegian J. Agr. Sci. 10(4):1996;425-435.
28. Keeling, L.J., 1994. Feather pecking - Who in the group does it, How often and under what circumstances, Proceedings of the 9th European Poultry conference, Edinburgh, pp. 288-289.
29. Keeling, L.J., Wilhelmsson, M., 1997. Selection based on direct observations of feather pecking behaviour in adult laying hens. In: Koene, P., Blokhius, H.J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, pp. 77-79.
30. Kruijt J.P. The ontogeny of social behaviour in Burmese Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus). Behav. Suppl. 12:1964;1-201.
31. Leonard M.L., Horn A.G., Fairfull R.W. Correlates and consequences of allopecking in white leghorn chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 43:1995;17-26.
32. McBride G., Parer J., Foenander F. The social organization and behaviour of the feral domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. Monogr. 2:1969;127-181.
33. Polley C.R., Craig J.V., Bhagwat A.L. Crowding and agonistic behaviour: a curvilinear relationship? Poultry Science. 53(3):1974;1621-1623.
34. Schjelderup-Ebbe T. Beitrage zur sozialpsychologie des haushuhns. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 88:1922;225-252.
35. Simonsen H.B., Vestergaard K., Willeberg P. Effect of floor type and density of the integument of egg layers. Poultry Science. 59(10):1980;2202-2206.
36. Vestergaard K.S. Feather pecking and chronic fear in groups of red junglefowl: their relations to dustbathing, rearing environment and social status. Anim. Behav. 45:1993;1127-1140.
37. Vestergaard, K.S., 1994. Dustbathing and its relation to feather pecking in the fowl: motivational and developmental aspects, Dissertation. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen.
38. Wennrich G. Studien zum Verhalten verschiedener Hybrid-Herkünfte von Haushühnern (Gallus domesticus) in Boden-Intensivhaltung mit Besonderer berücksichtigung aggressiven Verhaltens sowie des Federpickens und des Kannibalismus: 6. Mitteilung: Verhaltensweisen beim Kannibalismus. Archiv für Geflügelkunde. 39:1975;78-83.
39. Wennrich G. Beziehungen zwischen Ranghöhe, Federpickaktivität und Aggressivität von Haushennen (Gallus domesticus). Archiv für Geflügelkunde. 39:1975;167-171.
40. Widowski, T.M., Duncan, I.J.H., 1995. Do domestic fowl form groups when resources are unlimited? In: Proceedings of the 28th International Congress of the ISAE, 3-6 August 1994, in Foulum, Denmark, pp. 140.
41. Ylander D.M., Craig J.V. Inhibition of agonistic acts between hens by a dominant third party. Applied Animal Ethology. 6:1980;63-69.