Cryotherapy vs duct tape

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

Volumn 157, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 491-

  Abramovits, William ^a  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIQUID NITROGEN;

ACTINIC KERATOSIS; ANESTHESIA; CHILDHOOD DISEASE; COTTON; CRYOSURGERY; CRYOTHERAPY; DATA ANALYSIS; DERMATOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; DEVICE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DUCT TAPE THERAPY; ERROR; EVALUATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISOTHERM; NURSING STAFF; PAIN; PAPILLOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; SKIN DISEASE; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT INDICATION; VERRUCA VULGARIS; VOMITING;

ADHESIVES; CHILD; CRYOTHERAPY; HUMANS; PAIN; WARTS;

EID: 0344950437     PISSN: 10724710     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.157.5.491-a     Document Type: Short Survey

References (2)

1. Focht DR III, Spicer C, Fairchok MP. The efficacy of duct tape vs cryotherapy in the treatment of verruca vulgaris (the common wart). Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:971-974.
2. Abramovits W. Quantification in cryosurgical procedures: dermatology at the Millenium. In: Dyall-Smith D, Marks R, eds. Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of Dermatology. New York, NY: Parthenon; 1999:548-549.