Leptogenesis and neutrino oscillations within a predictive G(224)/SO(10) framework

Physical Review D

Volumn 68, Issue 7, 2003, Pages

  Pati, Jogesh C ^a,b  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

^b SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASTRONOMY; ATMOSPHERE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR PHYSICS; OSCILLATION; PREDICTION; THERMAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0344924915     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.072002     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. See, e.g., K.A. Olive, G. Steigman, and T.P. Walker, Phys. Rep. 333, 389 (2000).
2. -11.
3. For measurements of baryon asymmetry through observation of acoustic peaks in the cosmic microwave background radiation, see P. de Barnardis et al., Astrophys. J. 564, 559 (2002) (BOOMERanG experiment),
4. and C. Pryke et al., Astrophys. J. ibid. 568, 46 (2002) (DASI experiment).
5. A combined analysis of these observations yields [Archeops Collaboration, A. Benoit, Astron. Astrophys. 399, L25 (2003)]
6. -11 (WMAP Collaboration, C. Bennett et al., astro-ph/0302207; astro-ph/0302209; astro-ph/0302213; astro-ph/0302215; astro-ph/0302217; astro-ph/0302218; astro-ph/0302220; astro-ph/0302222; astro-ph/0302223; astro-ph/0302224; astro-ph/0302225).
7. V. Kuzmin, V. Rubakov, and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. 155B, 36 (1985).
8. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986);
9. G. Lazarides and Q. Shaft, Phys. Lett. B ibid. 258, 305 (1991);
10. M.A. Luty, Phys. Rev. D 45, 455 (1992). The second paper discusses leptogenesis in the context of inflationary cosmology.
11. For an incomplete list of references on further works on leptogenesis, see, e.g., M. Flanz, E.A. Pascos, and U. Sarkar, Phys. Lett. B 345, 248 (1995);
12. L. Covi, E. Roulet, and F. Vissani, Phys. Lett. B ibid. 384, 169 (1996);
13. W. Buchmüller and M. Plümacher, Phys. Lett. B ibid. 389, 73 (1996);
14. W. Buchmüller and M. Plümacher, Phys. Lett. B 431, 354 (1998);
15. A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Rev. D 56, 5431 (1997);
16. T. Moroi and H. Murayama, hep-ph/9908223;
17. M.S. Berger and B. Brahmachari, Phys. Rev. D 60, 073009 (1999);
18. J. Ellis, S. Lola, and D. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. B 452, 87 (1999);
19. E. Ma, S. Sarkar, and U. Sarkar, Phys. Lett. B ibid. 458, 73 (1999);
20. K. Kang, S.F. Kang, and U. Sarkar, Phys. Lett. B ibid. 486, 391 (2000);
21. R. Rangarajan and H. Mishra, Phys. Rev. D 61, 043509 (2000);
22. H. Goldberg, Phys. Lett. B 474, 389 (2000);
23. R. Barbieri, P. Creminelli, A. Strumia, and N. Tetradis, Nucl. Phys. B575, 61 (2000);
24. D. Falcone and F. Tramontano, Phys. Lett. B 506, 1 (2001);
25. H.B. Nielsen and Y. Takanishi, Phys. Lett. B ibid. 507, 241 (2001);
26. J. Ellis, M. Raidal, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B ibid. 546, 228 (2002);
27. P.H. Frampton, S.L. Glashow, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B ibid. 548, 119 (2002);
28. M. Fujii and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B ibid. 549, 273 (2002);
29. R. Allahverdi and A. Majumdar, Phys. Rev. D 67, 023509 (2003);
30. Zhi-Zhong Xing, hep-ph/0209066;
31. T. Endoh et al., J. Phys. G 29, 1877 (2003). For references to works on leptogenesis based on SO(10) models, see Ref. [26].
32. 16 GeV) and/or superheavy Higgs bosons is hard to realize anyway within a plausible inflationary scenario satisfying the gravitino-constraint [see, e.g., E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, The Early Universe (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990)].
33. On the other hand, purely electroweak baryogenesis based on the sphaleron effects appears to be excluded for the case of the standard model without supersymmetry, and highly constrained as regards the available parameter space for the case of the supersymmetric standard model, owing to the LEP lower limit on the Higgs boson mass ≥ 115 GeV. For a recent review of these and other mechanisms and also for relevant references, see, e.g., M. Dine and A. Kusenko, hep-ph/0303065.
34. J.C. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 661 (1973);
35. Phys. Rev. D 10, 275 (1974).
36. H. Georgi, in Particles and Fields, edited by C. Carlson (AIP, New York, 1975), p. 575;
37. H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 93, 193 (1975).
38. Promising string theory solutions yielding the G(224) symmetry in 4D have been obtained, using different approaches, by a number of authors; see, e.g., I. Antoniadis, G. Leontaris, and J. Rizos, Phys. Lett. B 245, 161 (1990);
39. A. Murayama and A. Toon, Phys. Lett. B ibid. 318, 298 (1993);
40. G. Shiu and S.H. Tye, Phys. Rev. D 58, 106007 (1998);
41. Z. Kakushadze, Phys. Rev. D ibid. 58, 101901 (1998);
42. G. Aldazabal, L.E. Ibanez, and F. Quevedo, J. High Energy Phys. 01, 031 (2000);
43. C. Kokorelis, J. High Energy Phys. ibid. 08, 018 (2002);
44. C. Kokorelis, J. High Energy Phys. 11, 027 (2002);
45. M. Cvetic, G. Shiu, and A.M. Uranga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 201801 (2001);
46. Nucl. Phys. B615, 3 (2001);
47. M. Cvetic and I. Papadimitriou, Phys. Rev. D 67, 126006 (2003);
48. R. Blumenhagen, L. Gorlich, and T. Ott, J. High Energy Phys. 01, 021 (2003).
49. For a type I string-motivated scenario leading to the G(224) symmetry in 4D, see L.I. Everett, G.L. Kane, S.F. King, S. Rigolin, and L.T. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 531, 263 (2002).
50. Recently there have also been several works based on orbifold compactifications of five and six dimensional GUT theories which yield the G(224) symmetry in 4D with certain desirable features; see, e.g., R. Dermisek and A. Mafi, Phys. Rev. D 65, 055002 (2002);
51. Q. Shafi and Z. Tavartkiladze, Phys. Rev. D ibid. 66, 115002 (2002); hep-ph/0303150;
52. C.H. Albright and S.M. Barr, Phys. Rev. D 67, 013002 (2003);
53. H.D. Kim and S. Raby, J. High Energy Phys. 01, 056 (2003);
54. I. Gogoladze, Y. Mimura, and S. Nandi, Phys. Lett. B 562, 307 (2003);
55. B. Kyae and Q. Shafi, Phys. Lett. B ibid. 556, 97 (2003);
56. H. Baer et al., J. High Energy Phys. 05, 061 (2002).
57. st, say]. Despite this small gap, one would, however, have the benefits of SU(4) color to understand fermion masses and neutrino oscillations (as reviewed in Sec. II) and implement baryogenesis via leptogenesis, to be discussed here.
58. F. Gursey, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Phys. Lett. 60B, 177 (1976).
59. H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974).
60. S.M. Barr, Phys. Lett. 112B, 219 (1982);
61. J.P. Derendinger, J.E. Kim, and D.V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. ibid. 139B, 170 (1984);
62. I. Antoniadis, J. Ellis, J. Hagelin, and D.V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. B 194, 231 (1987).
63. F. Gursey, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Phys. Lett. 60B, 177 (1976);
64. Y. Achiman and B. Stech, Phys. Lett. ibid. 77B, 389 (1978);
65. Q. Shafi, Phys. Lett. ibid. 79B, 301 (1978);
66. A. deRujula, H. Georgi, and S.L. Glashow, in 5th Workshop on Grand Unification, edited by K. Kang et al. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1984), p. 88.
67. J.C. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D 10, 275 (1974);
68. R.N. Mohapatra and J.C. Pati, Phys. Rev. D ibid. 11, 566 (1975);
69. R.N. Mohapatra and J.C. Pati, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2558 (1975).
70. S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1681 (1981);
71. W. Marciano and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. D ibid. 25, 3092 (1982);
72. M. Einhorn and D.R.T. Jones, Nucl. Phys. B196, 475 (1982).
73. For work in recent years, see P. Langacker and M. Luo, Phys. Rev. D 44, 817 (1991);
74. U. Amaldi, W. de Boer, and H. Furtenau, Phys. Lett. B 260, 131 (1991);
75. F. Anselmo, L. Cifarelli, A. Peterman, and A. Zichichi, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis., A 104, 1817 (1991).
76. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, in Supergravity, edited by P. van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Freedman (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), p. 315;
77. T. Yanagida, in Workshop on the Unified Theory and Baryon Number in the Universe, edited by O. Sawada and A. Sugamoto (KEK, Tsukuba, Japan, 1979), p. 95;
78. R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
79. See, e.g., J.C. Pati, in Neutrino 98, Takayama, Japan, hep-ph/9807315;
80. Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 77, 299 (1999).
81. SuperKamiokande Collaboration, Y. Fukuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998).
82. See, e.g., reviews in A. Pilaftsis, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14, 1811 (1999);
83. W. Buchmüller and M. Plümacher, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A ibid. 15, 5047 (2000).
84. K.S. Babu, J.C. Pati, and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B566, 33 (2000).
85. J.C. Pati, lectures given at the summer school, ICTP, Trieste, 2001, to appear in the proceedings, hep-ph/0204240.
86. SNO Collaboration, Q.R. Ahmad et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301 (2002);
87. Homestake Collaboration, B.T. Cleveland et al., Astrophys. J. 496, 505 (1998);
88. GALLEX Collaboration, W. Hampel et al., Phys. Lett. B 447, 127 (1999);
89. SAGE Collaboration, J.N. Abdurashitov et al., Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 122, 211 (2002)
90. [J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 95, 181 (2002)];
91. GNO Collaboration, M. Altmann et al., Phys. Lett. B 490, 16 (2000);
92. SuperKamiokande Collaboration, S. Fukuda et al., Phys. Lett. B ibid. 539, 179 (2002).
93. e's produced in earth-based reactors is established by the KamLAND data: K. Eguchi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 021802 (2003).
94. K.S. Babu and J.C. Pati, in Recent Developments in Particle Physics and Cosmology, Proceedings of NATO Advanced Study Institute, 2000, Cascais, Portugal, edited by G. Branco, Q. Shafi, and J.I. Silva-Marcos, pp. 215-217;
95. K.S. Babu, J.C. Pati, and P. Rastogi (unpublished).
96. By combining these results with the analysis of the forthcoming paper [23], one would incorporate CP violation into this unified picture as well.
97. Many of these are based on phenomenological models just for neutrino masses, which are not linked to the masses and mixings of quarks and charged leptons. See, e.g., S.F. King, J. High Energy Phys. 09, 011 (2002), for a recent analysis along these lines and references therein.
98. For attempts within SO(10) models, see, e.g., E. Nezri and J. Orloff, J. High Energy Phys. 04, 020 (2003);
99. F. Bucella, D. Falcone, and F. Tramontano, Phys. Lett. B 524, 241 (2002);
100. G.C. Branco, F. Gonzales Felipe, F.R. Joaquim, and M.N. Rebelo, Nucl. Phys. B640, 202 (2002).
101. For a variant attempt within the left-right symmetric model, see A. Joshipura, E.A. Paschos, and W. Rodejohann, Nucl. Phys. ibid. B611, 227 (2001).
102. u.
103. u (see comments in Ref. [27])]. In the fourth paper, it is observed that the SMA and vacuum solutions produce reasonable asymmetry, but the LMA solution produces too large an asymmetry.
104. These have been introduced in various forms in the literature. For a sample, see, e.g., C.D. Frogatt and H.B. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B147, 277 (1979);
105. L. Hall and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3985 (1995);
106. P. Binetruy, S. Lavignac, and P. Ramond, Nucl. Phys. B477, 353 (1996).
107. In the string theory context, see, e.g., A. Faraggi, Phys. Lett. B 278, 131 (1992).
108. -2 (say)] can still be important for CP violation and thus leptogenesis.
109. H - together with a singlet S, and write a superpotential analogous to Eq. (2).
110. H»/M′ ∼ 1, rather than 1/10.
111. d. This turns out to be the origin of nontrivial CKM mixings (see Ref. [20]).
112. H) would get determined depending upon whether p(q) is one or zero (see below).
113. string.
114. P. Ginsparg, Phys. Lett. B 197, 139 (1987);
115. V.S. Kaplunovsky, Nucl. Phys. B307, 145 (1988);
116. V.S. Kaplunovsky, Nucl. Phys. B382, 436 E (1992).
117. J.C. Pati, to appear in the Proceedings of the Erice 2002 School, hep-ph/0305221.
118. 2) suggested by the atmospheric and solar neutrino data.
119. osc≈0.99 emerge as predictions of the model [20].
120. 12 by flavor symmetry. As pointed out by other authors [see, e.g., S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1566 (1979)
121. and Proc. XXVI Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics, Dallas, Texas, 1992;
122. H/M (for example). Both (a) and (b) are needed for this direct nonseesaw mass to be relevant to the LMA MSW solution.
123. 3.
124. H〉 in turn would induce phases (other than "0" and π) in some of the other VEV's as well, and may itself become complex rather than pure imaginary.
125. L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1945 (1983).
126. Within the framework developed in Ref. [23], the CP violating phases entering into the SUSY contributions (for example those entering into the squark-mixings) also arise entirely through phases in the fermion mass matrices.
127. s(b → sss̄) [23]. This feature has independently been noted recently by D. Chang, A. Massiero, and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. D 67, 075013 (2003).
128. W compared to the SM value), in the light of having both standard model and SUSY-contributions to CP and flavor-violations, and their distinguishing tests, are discussed in Ref. [23].
129. For reviews, see Chaps. 6 and 8 in E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, The Early Universe [6].
130. J. Ellis, J.E. Kim, and D. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. 145B, 181 (1984);
131. M.Yu. Khlopov and A. Linde, Phys. Lett. ibid. 138B, 265 (1984);
132. E. Holtmann, M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and T. Moroi, Phys. Rev. D 60, 023506 (1999).
133. B.A. Campbell, S. Davidson, and K.A. Olive, Nucl. Phys. B399, 111 (1993).
134. L. Covi, E. Roulet, and F. Vissani, Phys. Lett. B 384, 169 (1996).
135. M. Plumacher, Nucl. Phys. B530, 207 (1998).
136. P. Di Bari, hep-ph/0211175;
137. W. Buchmuller, P. Di Bari, and M. Plumacher, Nucl. Phys. B643, 367 (2002).
138. 1-decay width owing to the presence of both l+H and l̃+H̃-modes and an increase of g* from 106 for the standard model to 228 for SUSY.
139. 0.6] for K > 10 [47], and κ ≈ 1/2K for 1≲ K ≲; 10. As pointed out in Ref. [52], these expressions, frequently used in the literature, however, tend to overestimate κ by nearly a factor of 7. In what follows, we will therefore use Eq. (13) to evaluate κ.
140. M. Plumacher, Z. Phys. C 74, 549 (1997).
141. Hwould produce lepton-asymmetry during the process of reheating. I will comment later on the consistency of this possibility with the fermion mass-pattern exhibited in Sec. II. I would like to thank Qaisar Shafi for a discussion on these issues.
142. K. Kumekawa, T. Moroi, and T. Yanagida, Prog. Theor. Phys. 92, 437 (1994);
143. G.F. Giudice, M. Peleso, A. Riotto, and T. Tkachev, J. High Energy Phys. 08, 014 (1999);
144. T. Asaka, K. Hamaguchi, M. Kawasaki, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 464, 12 (1999).
145. 2. Derivation of such a picture with appropriate flavor-charge assignments from an underlying (string/M) theory is of course beyond the state of the art at present.
146. 2)/ √λ, for a constant M, for the case of nonthermal leptogenesis.
147. v) mass matrices of the neutrinos. Thus, in general, it is quite distinct from the phase(s) entering into observed CP violations in the K and the B systems.