Magnetic field annihilators: Invisible magnetization at the magnetic equator

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 155, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 509-513

  Maus, S ^a   Haak, V ^a  

^a GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Crustal magnetization; Lithospheric field; Magnetic interpretation; Magnetic inverse problem

Indexed keywords

INVERSE PROBLEM; LITHOSPHERE; MAGNETIC ANOMALY;

EID: 0344898357     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.02053.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Affleck, J., 1958. Interrelationships between magnetic anomaly components, Geophysics, 23, 738-748.
2. Arkani-Hamed, J. & Dyment, J., 1996. Magnetic potential and magnetization contrasts of the Earth's lithosphere, J. geophys. Res., 101, 11 401-11 425.
3. Arkani-Hamed, J. & Strangway, D.W., 1985. Lateral variations of apparent magnetic susceptibility of lithosphere deduced from Magsat data, J. geophys. Res., 90, 2655-2664.
4. Backus, G.E., 1970. Non-uniqueness of the external geomagnetic field determined by surface intensity measurements, J. geophys. Res., 75, 6339-6341.
5. Backus, G., Parker, R.L. & Constable, C., 1996. Foundations of Geomagnetism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6. Blakely, R.J., 1995. Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Harrison, C.G.A., Carle, H.M. & Hayling, K.L., 1994. Interpretation of satellite elevation magnetic anomalies, J. geophys. Res., 91, 3633-3650.
8. Jackson, A., Winch, D. & Lesur, V., 1999. Geomagnetic effects of the Earth's ellipticity, Geophys. J. Int., 138, 285-289.
9. Langel, R.A. & Hinze, W.J., 1998. The Magnetic Field of the Earth's Lithosphere-the Satellite Perspective, University Press, Cambridge.
10. Lesur, V. & Jackson, A., 2000. Exact solutions for internally induced magnetisation in a shell, Geophys. J. Int., 140, 453-459.
11. Maus, S., Rother, M., Holme, R., Lühr, H., Olsen, N. & Haak, V., 2002. First scalar magnetic anomaly map from champ satellite data indicates weak lithospheric field, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 10.1029/2001GL013 685.
12. Nolte, H.J. & Siebert, M., 1987. An analytical approach to the magnetic field, J. Geophys., 61, 69-76.
13. Olsen, N., 2000. A model of the geomagnetic main field and its secular variation for epoch 2000 estimated from Ørsted data, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 454-462.
14. Parker, R.L., 1994. Geophysical Inverse Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
15. Purucker, M.E., Langel, R.A., Rajaram, M. & Raymond, C., 1998. Global magnetization models with a priori information, J. geophys. Res., 103, 2563-2584.
16. Purucker, M.E., Langlais, B., Olsen, N., Hulot, G. & Mandea, M., 2002. The southern edge of cratonic North America: evidence from new satellite observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 10.1029/2001GL013645.
17. Runcorn, S.K., 1975. On the interpretation of Lunar magnetism, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 10, 327-335.
18. Wessel, P. & Smith, W.H.F., 1991. Free software helps map and display data, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 72, 441.
19. Whaler, K.A. & Langel, R.A., 1996. Minimal crustal magnetizations from satellite data, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 98, 303-319.