Field performance of cell suspension-derived tall fescue regenerants and their half-sib families

Crop Science

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 375-381

  Stadelmann, F J ^a   Kolliker R ^a   Boller, B ^b   Spangenberg, G ^c   Nosberger J ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b Eidg Forschungsanstalt fur Agrarokologie und Landbau   (Switzerland)

^c LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREEDING METHODS; GENETIC TRAIT; REGENERATIVE ABILITY; SEED DEVELOPMENT; SUSPENSION CELL CULTURE; SWITZERLAND;

FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA;

EID: 0344889146     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X0039000200013x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aastveit, A.H., and K. Aastveit. 1990. Theory and application of openpollination and polycross in forage grass breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 79:618-624.
2. Backhaus, K., B. Erichson, W. Plinke, and R. Weiber. 1996. Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. 8th ed., Springer Verlag, Berlin.
3. Baillie, A.M.R., B.G. Rossnagel, and K.K. Kartha. 1992. Field evaluation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes derived from tissue culture. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72:725-733.
4. Bajaj, Y.P.S. 1995. Cryopreservation of plant cell, tissue, and organ culture for the conservation of germplasm and biodiversity, p. 3-28. In Y.P.S. Bajaj (ed.) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry 32. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
5. Barnes, R F. 1990. Importance and problems of tall fescue, p. 1-12. In M.J. Kasperbauer (ed.) Biotechnology in tall fescue improvement. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
6. Hanson, K., P. Hucl, and R.J. Baker. 1994. Comparative field performance of tissue culture-derived lines and breeder lines of Hy320 spring wheat. Plant Breed. 112:183-191.
7. Hoveland, C.S. 1993. Importance and economic significance of the Acremonium endophytes to performance of animals and grass plant. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 44:3-12.
8. Kaiser, H.F. 1958. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23:187-200.
9. Karp, A. 1991. On the current understanding of somaclonal variation. p. 1-58. In B.J. Miflin (ed.) Oxford Surv. Plant Mol. Cell Biol. 7. Clarendon Press & Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
10. Kasperbauer, M.J. 1990. Plant regeneration and evaluation, p. 59-96. In M.J. Kasperbauer (ed.) Biotechnology in tall fescue improvement. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
11. Kaul, K. 1990. Potential biotechnological approaches. p. 13-23. In M.J. Kasperbauer (ed.) Biotechnology in tall fescue improvement. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
12. Larkin, P.J., S.A. Ryan, R.I.S. Brettell, and W.R. Scowcroft. 1984. Heritable somaclonal variation in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67: 443-455.
13. Latch, G.C.M., and M.J. Christensen. 1982. Ryegrass endophyte, incidence and control. N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 25:443-448.
14. Mezencev, N., G. Clément, and E. Guiderdoni. 1995. Variation among progenies of diploid plants regenerated from haploid, microsporederived cell-suspension protoplasts of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Breed. 114:149-154.
15. Olesen, A., M. Storgaard, and S. Madsen. 1996. Suspension culture performance in commercial varieties of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Euphytica 88:151-157.
16. Orton, T.J. 1984. Somaclonal variation: Theoretical and practical considerations. p. 427-468. In J.P. Gustafson (ed.) Gene manipulation in plant improvement. Plenum Press, New York.
17. Qureshi, J.A., P. Hucl, and K.K. Kartha. 1992. Is somaclonal variation a reliable tool for spring wheat improvement? Euphytica 60: 221-228.
18. Roylance, J.T., N.S. Hill, and W.A. Parrott. 1994. Detection of somaclonal variation in tissue culture regenerants of tall fescue. Crop Sci. 34:1369-1372.
19. Sokal, R.R., and F.J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
20. Spangenberg, G., Z.Y. Wang, G. Legris, P. Montavon, T. Takamizo, R. Pérez-Vicente, M.P. Vallés, J. Nagel, and I. Potrykus. 1995a. Intergeneric symmetric and asymmetric somatic hybridization in Festuca and Lolium. Euphytica 85:235-245.
21. Spangenberg, G., Z.Y. Wang, X. Wu, J. Nagel, V.A. Iglesias, and I. Potrykus. 1995b. Transgenic tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and red fescue (Festuca rubra) plants from microprojectile bombardment of embryogenic suspension cells. J. Plant Physiol. 145: 693-701.
22. Stadelmann, F.J., B. Boller, G. Spangenberg, R. Kölliker, M. Messerli, Z.Y. Wang, J. Nösberger. 1998a. Fertility and growth in the field of Lolium perenne and Festuca rubra plants regenerated from suspension cultured cells and protoplasts. Plant Breed. 117:37-43.
23. Stadelmann, F.J., B. Boller, G. Spangenberg, R. Kölliker, Z.Y. Wang, I. Potrykus, J. Nösberger. 1998b. Field performance of cell suspension-derived Lolium perenne L. regenerants and their progenies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96:634-639.
24. Van Loo, E.N. 1993. On the relation between tillering, leaf area dynamics and growth of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) Ph.D. thesis. Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
25. Wang, Z.Y., G. Legris, J. Nagel, I. Potrykus, and G. Spangenberg. 1994. Cryopreservation of embryogenic cell suspensions in Festuca and Lolium species. Plant Sci. 103:93-106.
26. Yamagishi, M., M. Otani, and T. Shimada. 1996. A comparison of somaclonal variation in rice plants derived and not derived from protoplasts. Plant Breed. 115:289-294.
27. Yamagishi, M., K. Itoh, T. Koba, Y. Sukeiyko, K. Shimamoto, and T. Shimada. 1997. Characteristics of genetic variation in the progenies of protoplast-derived plants of rice, Oryza saliva cv Nipponbara. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:1-7.