Derivative spectrophotometric determination of the triethylammonium salt of cefotaxime in presence of related compounds from the synthesis

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

Volumn 18, Issue 4-5, 1998, Pages 579-583

  Nuevas, L ^a   Gonzalez R ^a   Rodriguez J C ^a   Hoogmartens, J ^b  

^a Depto de Analisis Farmaceutico   (Cuba)

^b REGA INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Assay; Cefotaxime; Derivative spectrophotometry

Indexed keywords

CEFOTAXIME;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DERIVATIZATION; DRUG DETERMINATION; DRUG SYNTHESIS; IN VITRO STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; TECHNIQUE;

CEFOTAXIME; CEPHALOSPORINS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ATOMIC;

EID: 0344889075     PISSN: 07317085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0731-7085(98)00279-9     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. J.C. Rodríguez, R. Hernández, M. González M.M. López, Reglamento de Laboratorio para la obtención de cefotaxima, Internai Report, Centro de Química Farmacéutica, Havana, 1996, pp. 1-27.
2. Monograph cefotaxime, United States Pharmacopeia 23. United States Pharmacopeial Convention, MD, 1995, pp. 299.
3. F. Sáchez Rojas, C. Boch Ojeda, J.M. Cano Pavón, Talanta 35 (1988) 753-761.
4. Wavelength Scanning Spectrophotometer, version 1.2, Pharmacia LKB BioChrom 4060 (1992).
5. M.A. Camacho, M.I. López, M.E. Cruz, STP Pharma Pratiques 3 (1993) 197-202.
6. ICH Harmonization Tripartite Guideline: Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology. 6 November 1996.
7. J.A. Murillo, J. Rodríguez, J.M. Lemus, A. Alañon, Analyst 115 (1990) 1117-1119.
8. D.L. Massart, A. Dijkstra, L. Kaufman, Evaluation and Optimization of Laboratory Methods and Analytical Procedures. A Survey of Statistical and Mathematical Techniques, Vol. 1: Techniques and Instrumentation in Analytical Chemistry, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978, pp. 587-592.
9. A.C. Calpena, E. Escribano, C. Fernández, Farm. Clin. 7 (1991) 749-758.
10. Norme internationale ISO 5725. Exactitude (justesse et fidélité) des résultats et méthodes de mesure. Partie 2: Méthode de base pour la détermination de la répétabilité et de la reproductibilité d'une methode de mesure normalisée. Organisation Internationale de Normalisation (ISO), Genève, 1994.
11. Comisión Permanente de la Farmacopea de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Validación de Métodos Analíticos, 1991, pp. 1-73.