Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases International

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 576-580

  Ke, Zhong Wei ^a   Zheng, Cheng Zhu ^a   Li, Ji Hui ^a   Yin, Kai ^a   Hua, Ji De ^a  

^a SECOND MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cholecystectomy; Cholelithiasis; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography; Laparoscopy; Magnetic resonance cholangiography

Indexed keywords

ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; AMYLASE; ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE; BILIRUBIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHOLANGITIS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ECHOGRAPHY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PANCREATITIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0344875952     PISSN: 14993872     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A, et al. The efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1999;178:480-484.
2. Aliperti G. Complications related to diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 1996;6: 379-407.
3. Widdison AL, Longstaff AJ, Armstrong CP. Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment of gallstones and bile duct stones: a prospective study. Br J Surg 1994; 81:595-597.
4. Dwerryhouse SJ, Brown E, Vipond MN. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1998;85:1364-1366.
5. Bearcroft PW, Lomas DJ. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Gut 1997;41:135-137.
6. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Zfass AM. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a new technique for evaluating the biliary tract and pancreatic duct. Gastroenterologist 1998;6:82-87.
7. Park MS, Yu JS, Kim YH, et al. Acute cholecystitis: comparison of MR cholangiography and US. Radiology 1998;209:781-785.
8. Liu TH, Consorti ET, Kawashima A, et al. Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2001;234:33-40.
9. Cervantes J, Rojas G. Choledocholithiasis: new approach to an old problem. World J Surg 2001;25:1270-1272.
10. Boraschi P, Gigoni R, Braccini G, et al. Detection of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evaluation with MR cholangiography. Acta Radiol 2002;43:593-598.
11. Li JH, Zheng CZ, Ke ZW, et al. Management of aberrant bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HBPD Int 2002;1:438-441.
12. Kats J, Kraai M, Dijkstra AJ, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography as a diagnostic tool for common bile duct stones: a comparison with ERCP and clinical follow-up. Dig Surg 2003;20:32-37.
13. Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, et al. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. Br J Surg 2003;90:42-47.