Authorship-coauthorship

Archive of Oncology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 211-212

  Vučković Dekić, Ljiljana ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ONCOLOGY AND RADIOLOGY OF SERBIA   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Authorship; Ethics; Publishing; Research; Science

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ONCOLOGY;

EID: 0344875602     PISSN: 03547310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2298/AOO0303211V     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Hudson Jones A. Changing traditions of authorship, In: Hudson Jones A, McLellan F, editors. Ethical issues in biomedical publications. Baltimore & London: The John Hopkins University Press; 2000. p.1-29.
2. Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L. When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA 1997;278:579-85.
3. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:36-47 (Version updated in 2001). Avalaible from: www.icmie.org
4. NIH Committee on scientific conduct and ethics, Guidelines for the conduct of research in the intramural research programs at NIH. Available from: www.nih.gov
5. European Science Foundation. Good Scienific Practice in research and scholarship. Available from: www.esf.org
6. Vučković-Dekić Lj. Multiauthorship in three oncologic scientific journals. Archive of Oncology 2000;8:109-10.
7. Vučković-Dekić Lj, Todorović Lj. Authorship/coauthorship in three stomatologic scientific journals. Stom Glas S 2000;47:189-91. (in Serbian)
8. Slone RM. Coauthors contributions to major papers published in the AJR: Frequency of undeserved coauthorship. Amer J Radiol 1996;167:571-9.
9. Vučković-Dekić Lj. Multiauthorship - what is it, and does it matter? Archive of Oncology 2000;8:139.
10. Vučković-Dekić Lj, Ribarić B, Vračar B. Implementation of various criteria for evaluating the scientific output of professional scientists and clinicians-scientists. Archive of Oncology 2001;9:103-6.
11. Horton R. The imagined author. In: Hudson Jones A, McLellan F, editors. Ethical issues in biomedical publications. Baltimore & London: The John Hopkins University Press; 2000. p. 30-57.
12. Wilcox LJ. Authorship. The coin of realm, the source of complaints. JAMA 1998;280:216-7.
13. Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, Phillips SG, Pace BP, Lundberg GD et al. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA 1998;280:222-4.
14. Medical Research Council. Principles in the assessment and conduct of medical research. Available from: www.mrc.ac.uk
15. Deutsche Forschunggemeinshaft. Reccomendations of the Commission on professional self-regulation in science: Proposals for safeguarding Good Scientific Practice. Available from: www.dfg.de
16. Smith R. Authorship: time for a paradigm shift? BMJ 1997;314:992.
17. Smith R. Maintaining the integrity of scientific record. BMJ 2001;323:588.
18. Smith J. Gift authorship: A poisoned chalice? BMJ 1994;309:1456-7.
19. Anonimous. Games people play with authors' names. (Editorial). Nature 1997;387:831
20. Gunsalus CK. Scientific misconduct. Policy issues In: Hudson Jones A, McLellan F, editors. Ethical issues in biomedical publications. Baltimore & London: The John Hopkins University Press; 2000. p. 223-49.
21. Bogdanović G, Vučković-Dekić Lj. The publishing ethics. In: Vučković-Dekić Lj, Milenković P, Šobić V, editors. Ethics of scientific work in biomedicine. Belgrade: Academy of Medical Sciences of Serbian Medical Society and Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade; 2002. p. 84-95. (in Serbian)