Relative image size, not eye position, determines eye dominance switches

Vision Research

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 229-234

  Banks, Martin S ^a   Ghose, Tandra ^a   Hillis, James M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aniseikonia; Binocular disparity; Binocular vision; Eye dominance; Eye movements; Ocular dominance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; EYE DOMINANCE; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE POSITION; GAZE; IMAGE DISPLAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0344861918     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.029     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Backus B.T., Banks M.S., van Ee R., Crowell J.A. Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception. Vision Research. 39:1999;1143-1170.
2. Hillis J.M., Banks M.S. Are corresponding points fixed? Vision Research. 41:2001;2457-2473.
3. Khan A.Z., Crawford J.D. Ocular dominance reverses as a function of horizontal gaze angle. Vision Research. 41:2001;1743-1748.
4. Khan A.Z., Crawford J.D. Coordinating one hand with two eyes: optimizing for field of view in a pointing task. Vision Research. 43:2003;409-417.
5. Ogle K.N. Induced size effect. I. A new phenomenon in binocular space-perception associated with the relative sizes of the images in the two eyes. APA Archives of Ophthalmology. 20:1938;604-623.
6. Porac C., Coren S. The dominant eye. Psychological Bulletin. 83:1976;880-897.