Pulling the other one: 1st- and 2nd-order visual information interact to determine perceived location

Vision Research

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 279-286

  Whitaker, David ^a   McGraw, Paul V ^a   Keeble, David R T ^a   Skillen, Jennifer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

1st order; 2nd order; Illusion; Position

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; ILLUSION; PERCEPTION; POSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0344861911     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Akutsu H., Levi D.M. Selective attention to specific location cues: the peak and center of a patch are equally accessible as location cues. Perception. 27:1998;1015-1023.
2. Akutsu H., McGraw P.V., Levi D.M. Alignment of separated patches: multiple location tags. Vision Research. 39:1999;789-801.
3. Arsenault A.S., Wilkinson F., Kingdom F.A.A. Modulation frequency and orientation tuning of second-order texture mechanisms. Journal of Optical Society of America A. 16:1999;427-435.
4. Badcock D.R., Derrington A.M. Detecting the displacement of periodic patterns. Vision Research. 25:1985;1253-1258.
5. Burbeck C.A. Position and spatial-frequency in large-scale localization judgements. Vision Research. 27:1987;417-427.
6. Burbeck C.A. Large-scale relative localization across spatial frequency channels. Vision Research. 28:1988;857-859.
7. Chubb C., Sperling G. Drift-balanced random stimuli - a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 5:1988;1986-2007.
8. Dakin S.C., Mareschal I. Sensitivity to amplitude modulation depends on carrier spatial frequency and orientation. Vision Research. 40:2000;311-329.
9. Dakin S.C., Williams C.B., Hess R.F. The interaction of first- and second-order cues to orientation. Vision Research. 39:1999;2867-2884.
10. Derrington A. Second-order visual processing. Optics & Photonics News. (January):2001;18-20.
11. De Valois R.L., De Valois K.K. Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Research. 31:1991;1627-1631.
12. Edwards M., Badcock D.R. Global motion perception - no interaction between first and second order motion pathways. Vision Research. 35:1995;2589-2602.
13. Fraser J. A new illusion of visual direction. British Journal of Psychology. 2:1908;307-320.
14. Hess R.F., Hayes A. Neural recruitment explains "Weber's law" of spatial position. Vision Research. 33:1993;1673-1684.
15. Keeble D.R.T., Hess R.F. Orientation masks 3-Gabor alignment performance. Vision Research. 38:1998;827-840.
16. Kooi F.L., De Valois R.L., Switkes E. Spatial localization across channels. Vision Research. 31:1991;1627-1631.
17. Ledgeway T., Smith A.T. Evidence for separate motion detection mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision. Vision Research. 34:1994;2727-2740.
18. Lin L.M., Wilson H.R. Fourier and non-Fourier pattern discrimination compared. Vision Research. 36:1996;1907-1918.
19. Mareschal I., Baker C.L. A cortical locus for the processing of contrast-defined contours. Nature Neuroscience. 1:1998;150-154.
20. McGraw P.V., Levi D.M., Whitaker D. Spatial characteristics of the second-order visual pathway revealed by positional adaptation. Nature Neuroscience. 2:1999;479-484.
21. McOwan P.W., Johnston A. A second-order pattern reveals separate strategies for encoding orientation in two-dimensional space and space-time. Vision Research. 36:1996;425-430.
22. Morgan M.J., Baldassi S. How the visual system encodes the orientation of a texture and why it makes mistakes. Current Biology. 7:1997;999-1002.
23. Morgan M.J., Hole G.J., Glennerster A. Biases and sensitivities in geometrical illusions. Vision Research. 30:1990;1793-1810.
24. Morgan M.J., Mason A.J.S., Baldassi S. Are there separate first-order and second-order mechanisms for orientation discrimination? Vision Research. 40:2000;1751-1763.
25. Pelli D.G., Zhang L. Accurate control of contrast on micro-computer displays. Vision Research. 31:1991;1337-1350.
26. Shapley R.M. Linearity and non-linearity in cortical receptive fields. CIBA Foundation symposium, higher-order processing in the visual system. Vol. 184:1994;71-81 Wiley, Chichester.
27. Skillen J., Whitaker D., Popple A.V., McGraw P.V. The importance of spatial scale in determining illusions of orientation. Vision Research. 42:2002;2447-2455.
28. Spitzer H., Hochstein L.I. Simple-cell and complex-cell response dependencies on stimulation parameters. Journal of Neurophysiology. 53:1985;1244-1265.
29. Toet A., Koenderink J.J. Differential spatial discrimination thresholds for Gabor patches. Vision Research. 28:1988;133-143.
30. Toet A., van Eekhout M.P., Simons H.L.J.J., Koenderink J.J. Scale invariant features of differential spatial displacement discrimination. Vision Research. 27:1987;441-451.
31. von der Heydt R., Peterhans E. Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. 1. Lines of pattern discontinuity. Journal of Neuroscience. 9:1989;1731-1748.
32. Wenderoth P., Clifford C.W.G., Ma Wyatt A. Hierarchy of interactions in the processing of contrast-defined contours. Journal of Optical Society of America A. 18:2001;2190-2196.
33. Whitaker D., Bradley A., Barrett B.T., McGraw P.V. Isolation of stimulus characteristics contributing to Weber's law for position. Vision Research. 42:2002;1137-1148.
34. Whitaker D., MacVeigh D. Interaction of spatial frequency and separation in Vernier acuity. Vision Research. 31:1991;1205-1212.
35. Whitaker D., McGraw P.V., Pacey I., Barrett B.T. Centroid analysis predicts visual localization of first- and second-order stimuli. Vision Research. 36:1996;2957-2970.
36. Wilson H.R. Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain Vernier acuity. Vision Research. 26:1986;453-469.
37. Zeigler L.R., Hess R.F. Stereoscopic depth but not shape perception from second order stimuli. Vision Research. 39:1999;1491-1507.
38. Zhou Y.X., Baker C.L. Envelope-responsive neurons in area 17 and area 18 of cat. Journal of Neurophysiology. 72:1994;2134-2150.
39. Zhou Y.X., Baker C.L. Spatial properties of envelope responsive cells in area 17 and 18 neurons of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology. 75:1996;1038-1050.