Modelling work-trip mode choice decisions in two-worker households

Transportation Planning and Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 49-73

  Badoe, Daniel A ^a  

^a Tennessee Technological University   (United States)

Author keywords

Household model; Joint model; Mode choice; Multinomial logit; Sampling unit

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; URBAN PLANNING;

CHOICE MODEL; MODEL ESTIMATION DATA;

TRANSPORTATION;

DECISION MAKING; MODELING; SAMPLING; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0344823927     PISSN: 03081060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03081060290032051     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Domencich, T.A. and McFadden, D. (1975) Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioral Analysis. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
2. Ben-Akiva, M.E. and Lerman, S.R. (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
3. Meyer, M.D. and Miller, E.J. (1984) Urban Transportation Planning: A Decision Oriented Approach. McGraw-Hill Publishers, New York, USA.
4. Ben-Akiva, M.E. and Lerman, S.R. (1976) Disaggregate behavioral model of automobile ownership. Transportation Research Record No. 569. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. pp. 34-50.
5. Ben-Akiva, M.E. and Richards, M.G. (1976) Disaggregate multimodal model for work trips in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Record No. 569. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. pp. 107-123.
6. Johnson, M.A. and Adiv, A. (1978) Forecasting travel demand in small areas by using disaggregate behavioral models, Transportation Research Record No. 673. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. pp. 26-31.
7. Shultz, G. E. (1983) Development of a travel-demand model set for the New Orleans Region. Transportation Research Record No. 944. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. pp. 128-134.
8. Kuppam, A.R., Pendyala, R.M. and Rahman, S. (1999) Analysis of the role of traveler attitudes and perceptions in explaining mode choice behavior. Transportation Research Record No. 1676. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, pp. 68-76. Washington D.C.
9. Lancaster, K. (1974) Introduction to Modern Microeconomics, 2nd edn. Rand McNally College Publishing Company, Chicago.
10. White, M.J. (1977) "A model of residential location choice and commuting by men and women workers", Journal of Regional Science 17(1), 41-52.
11. Curran, C., Carlson, L.A. and Ford, D.A. (1982) "A theory of residential location decisions of two-worker households", Journal of Urban Economics 12, 102-114.
12. Kim, S. (1994) Gender differences in commuting: an empirical study of the los angeles metropolitan area. Presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
13. Miller, E.J. and Rhamey, W.R. (1987) "Modelling household mode choice", Proceedings of the World Conference in Transportation Research, 1551-1569.
14. Kanafani, A. (1983) Transportation Demand Analysis. McGraw-Hill Publishers, New York, USA.
15. Koppelman, F. and Forinash, C. (1993) Application and interpretation of nested logit models of intercity mode choice. Transportation Research Record No. 1413. Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. pp. 98-106.
16. Amemiya, T. and Shimono, K. (1989) "An application of nested logit models to the labor supply of the elderly", The Economic Studies Quarterly 40(1), 373-381.
17. Borsch-Supan, A. and Hajivassiliou, V.A. (1993) "Smooth unbiased multivariate probability simulators for maximum likelihood estimation of limited dependent variable models", Journal of Econometrics 58, 347-368.
18. Horowitz, J.L. (1982) Sources of error and uncertainty in behavioral travel-demand models. In: Stopher, P.R., Meyburg, A.H. and Brog, W. (Eds.), New Horizons in Travel-Behaviour Research, pp. 543-557. D.C. Heath and Company, Lexington, MA.
19. Data Management Group (1987). The transportation tomorrow survey, design and conduct of the survey. Report to 1he Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, Toronto.