Using Ecological-Niche Modeling to Predict Barred Owl Invasions with Implications for Spotted Owl Conservation

Conservation Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1161-1165

  Peterson, A Townsend ^a   Robins, C Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; ENDANGERED SPECIES; MODELING; NICHE; RAPTOR; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

NORTH AMERICA; PACIFIC NORTHWEST;

RAPTORES; STRIGIFORMES; STRIX; STRIX OCCIDENTALIS; STRIX VARIA;

EID: 0344796402     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02206.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. 8th edition. AOU, Washington, D.C.
2. Andersen, M. C., and D. Mahato. 1995. Demographic models and reserve designs for the California Spotted Owl. Ecological Applications 5:639-647.
3. Anderson, R. P., D. Lew, and A. T. Peterson. 2003. Using error distributions to select best subsets of predictive models of species' distributions. Ecological Modelling 162:211-232.
4. Barrowclough, G. F., and R. J. Gutierrez. 1990. Genetic variation and differentiation in the Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis). Auk 107:737-744.
5. Barrowclough, G. F., R. J. Gutierrez, and J. G. Groth. 1999. Genetic structure of Spotted Owl populations based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 53:919-931.
6. Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC). 2002. Identification and evaluation of Northern Spotted Owl habitat in managed forests of southwest Oregon and the development of silvicultural systems for managing such habitat. U.S. Geological Survey, FRESC, Corvallis, Oregon. Available from http://xorn.wr.usgs.gov/ fresc/administrative/detail.php? projectID=44&cat=App_Sci_Info (accessed August 2002).
7. Gremel, S. 2000. Barred Owl displaces Northern Spotted Owl at Olympic. U.S. National Park Service, Washington, D.C. Available from http://www.aqd.nps. gov/pubs/yir/yir2000/pages/02_nps_science/ 02_03_gremel.html (accessed August 2002).
8. Grinnell, J. 1917. Field tests of theories concerning distributional control. The American Naturalist 51:115-128.
9. Gutierrez, R. J., A. B. Franklin, and W. S. Lahaye. 1995. Spotted Owl, Strix occidentalis. Birds of North America 179:1-28.
10. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2001. Climate data archive. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. Available from http:// www.ipcc.ch/ (accessed August 2002).
11. Lamberson, R. H., B. R. Noon, C. Voss, and K. S. McKelvey. 1994. Reserve design for territorial species: effects of patch size and spacing on the viability of the Northern Spotted Owl. Conservation Biology 8:185-195.
12. Murphy, D. D., and B. R. Noon. 1992. Integrating scientific methods with habitat conservation planning: reserve design for Northern Spotted Owls. Ecological Applications 2:3-17.
13. National Aeronautic and Space Administration (NASA). 2002. Land cover land use program. NASA, Washington, D.C. Available from http://lcluc.gsfc.nasa. gov/ (accessed August 2002).
14. Peterson, A. T. 2001. Predicting species' geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. Condor 103:599-605.
15. Peterson, A. T., and D. A. Vieglais. 2001. Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling. BioScience 51:363-371.
16. Peterson, A. T., L. G. Ball, and K. C. Cohoon. 2002a. Predicting distributions of tropical birds. Ibis 144:e27-e32.
17. Peterson, A. T., D. R. B. Stockwell, and D. A. Kluza. 2002b. Distributional prediction based on ecological niche modeling of primary occurrence data. Pages 617-623 in J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, and M. L. Morrison, editors. Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
18. Root, T. L., and J. D. Weckstein. 1994. Changes in distribution patterns of select wintering North American birds from 1901 to 1989. Studies in Avian Biology 15:191-201.
19. Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, and J. Fallon. 2001. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, results and analysis 1966-2000. Version 2001.2. U.S. Geological Survey Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. Available from http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/bbs.html (accessed August 2002).
20. Scachetti-Pcreira, R. 2002. Desktop GARP. University of Kansas Natural History Museum, Lawrence. Available from http://www. lifemapper.org/desktopgarp/ (accessed August 2002).
21. Stockwell, D. R. B. 1999. Genetic algorithms II. Pages 123-144 in A. H. Fielding, editor. Machine learning methods for ecological applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
22. Stockwell, D. R. B., and I. R. Noble. 1992. Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of analysis. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 33:385-390.
23. Stockwell, D. R. B., and D. P. Peters. 1999. The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems 13:143-158.
24. Stockwell, D. R. B., and A. T. Peterson. 2002a. Controlling bias in biodiversity data. Pages 537-546 in J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, and M. L. Morrison, editors. Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
25. Stockwell, D. R. B., and A. T. Peterson. 2002b. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecological Modelling 148:1-13.
26. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2001. HYDRO1k elevation derivative database. USGS, Washington, D.C. Available from http://edcdaac. usgs.gov/gtopo30/hydro/ (accessed August 2002).
27. Vieglais, D. A. 2000. The species analyst. University of Kansas Natural History Museum, Lawrence. Available from http://speciesanalyst. net/ (accessed August 2002).