Appropriate level of protection: A European perspective

The Economics of Quarantine and the SPS Agreement

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 105-131

  Henson, Spencer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344795309     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/UPO9781922064325.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Agra Europe (1999) 'BST residue limit not necessary says EU', Agra Europe 10 December, page 9.
2. Agra Europe (2000) 'Precautionary principle appraised', Agra Europe September, page 9.
3. Bureau, J.C. and J.P. Doussin (1999) Sanitary and technical regulations: issues for trade liberalisation in the dairy sector. Unpublished document, INRA, Paris.
4. Carr, S. (2000) Ethical and value-based aspects of the precautionary principle. Paper presented at the 2nd Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen.
5. Carter, M.D. (1997) 'Selling science under the SPS Agreement: accommodating consumer preference in the growth hormones controversy', Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 6(1): 625-656.
6. CEC (1993) Final scientific report of the committee for veterinary medicinal products on the application for marketing authorisation submitted by the Monsanto company for Somatech 500mg Sometribove (Recombinant Bovine Somatropin) for subcutaneous injection. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
7. CEC (1997) Green Paper on General Principles of Food Law. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
8. CEC (2000a) Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
9. CEC (2000b) Speaking note from commissioner byrne, inter-group on animal welfare, 16 February. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
10. Codex Alimentarius (2000) Report of the Fifteenth Session of the Codex Alimentarius Committee on General Principles. Rome: Codex Alimentarius.
11. Council of Ministers (1999) Opinion of Council of Ministers. Brussels: Council of Ministers.
12. European Parliament (2000) Draft Opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy. Brussels: European Parliament.
13. Gremmen, B. and H. ven den Belt (2000) The precautionary principle and pesticides, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12: 197-205.
14. Gremmen, B. and H. ven den Belt (2000b) The precautionary principle or the unbearable lightness of the burden of proof. Paper presented at the 2nd Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen.
15. INRA (1998) 'La Securite des produit alimentaires', Eurobarometre 49. Paris: INRA.
16. James, P., F. Kemper and G. Pascal (1999) A European food and public health authority: the future of scientific advice in the EU, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
17. Jarvis, L.S. (2000) 'The potential effect of Recombinant Bovine Somatropin (rBST) on world dairying', in Transitions in agbiotech: economics of strategy and policy edited by W.H. Lesser, Food Marketing Policy Center, University of Connecictut.
18. Kalaitzandonakes, N. and L.A. Marks (1999) 'Public opinion of AgBiotech in the US and UK: a content analysis approach', Paper presented at the National Meeting of the American Association of Agricultural Economics, Nashville, August.
19. Kronfeld, D.S. (1993) 'Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone: its efficacy, safety and impacts on herd health management, economics and public health', in The dairy debate: consequences of Bovine Growth Hormone and rotational grazing technologies, edited by W.C. Liebhardt, Davis: University of California.
20. Matthee, M. and D. Vermersch (2000) 'Are the precautionary principle and the international trade of genetically-modified organisms reconcilable?' Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12: 59-70.
21. Maze, A., M.T. Letablier, and E. Valceschini (1996) Les bases iInstitutionnelles, in La qualité dans l'agro-alimentaire: émérgence d'un champ de recherches, edited by F. Casabiance and E. Valceshini, Paris: INRA.
22. McGovern, E. (1995) International trade regulation, Exeter: Globefield Press.
23. McGuirck, A.M. and H.M. Kaiser (1991) 'BST and milk: benefit or bane?' Choices 32: 20-26.
24. OECD (2000) Precautionary approaches and principles in the context of food safety. Unpublished Paper, OECD, Paris.
25. Pauwelyn, J. (1999) 'The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures as applied in the first three SPS disputes', Journal of International Economic Law 2(4): 641-664.
26. Scientific Committee for Food (1996) Opinion on response to request from the Commission for SCF opinion on the scientific basis of the concept of threshold of regulation in relation to food contact materials. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
27. Seilheimer, L.K. (1998) 'The SPS Agreement applied: the WTO hormone beef case', Environmental Lawyer 4(2): 537-576.
28. Somogyi, A. (1999) Assuring science-based decisions: determining the appropriate level of protection: threshold of regulations/implementation. Paper presented at the conference on International Food Trade Beyond 2000: Science-Based Decisions, Harmonisation, Equivalence and Mutual Recognition, Melbourne, October.
29. Somogyi, A., G.B. Gori and K.E. Appel (1999) 'Regulatory toxicology' in Toxiology, edited by H. Marquardt, S. Schafer, R.O. McClellan and F. Welsch, San Diego: Academic Press.
30. Thomas, R.D. (1999) 'Where's the beef? Mad cows and the blight of the SPS Agreement', Vanderbilt Journal of International Law 32(2): 487-517.
31. WTO (1998a) Report of Appellate Body on EC: measures concerning meat and meat products (hormones), Geneva: World Trade Organization.
32. WTO (1998b) Report of Panel on Australia: measures affecting importation of salmon. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
33. WTO (1998c) Report of Appellate Body on Australia: measures affecting importation of salmon. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
34. WTO (1999) Report of Appellate Body on Japan: measures affecting agricultural practice. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
35. Wynne, B. (2000) Science, uncertainty and governance within the EU: new challenges and new visions from the field of environment, precaution and risk. Unpublished document.