The relevance of science and technology indicators: The case of pulp and paper

Research Policy

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 385-395

  Laestadius, Staffan ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Economics of innovation; Industrial innovation; Pulp and paper (p p); R D; Science and technology (S T)

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344787047     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00050-X     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Archibugi, D., Pianta, M., 1992. The Technological Specialization of Advanced Countries. The Commission of the European Communities and Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht.
2. BCG, 1978. A Framework for Swedish Industrial Policy. Stockholm.
3. Carlsson, B., Stankiewicz, R., 1995. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. In: Carlsson, B. (Ed.), Technological Systems and Economic Performance: The Case of Factory Automation. Kluwer Academic Publ., pp. 21-56.
4. Coombs, R., et. al. (Eds.), 1996. Technological Collaboration -The Dynamics of Cooperation in Industrial Innovation. Edward Elgar, UK.
5. Deiaco, E., 1993. Halkar Sverige efter? Sveriges position i det globala patentlandskapet. IVA Rapport, IVA-R-402, Stockholm.
6. Dertouzos, M., Lester, R., Solow, R., 1989. Made in America. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Dosi, G., et. al. (Eds.), 1988. Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter Publishers, London.
8. Edquist, C., 1993. Innovationspolitik för förnyelse av svensk industri (Innovation policy for renewal of the Swedish industry) Tema T Rapport 33, Linköping.
9. Faulkner, W., 1994. Conceptualizing Knowledge Used in Innovation: A Second Look at the Science-Technology Distinction and Industrial Innovation, Science, Technology and Human Values, Vol. 19, pp. 425-458.
10. Freeman, C., 1990. The Economics of Innovation. An Elgar Reference Collection. Edward Elgar Publ., Aldershot, England.
11. Freeman, C., Lundvall, B.-Å. (Eds.), 1988. Small Countries Facing the Technological Revolution. Pinter, London.
12. Frostell, B., Laestadius, S., 1997. Tänkbara utvecklingsvägar mot en uthållig skogsindustri (Possible paths towards a sustainable forest industry). Research report, TRITA-IEO R1997:1, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
13. Griliches, Z., Pakes, A., Hall, B., 1986. The value of patents as indicators of inventive activity. NBER Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
14. Hills, R., 1988. Papermaking in Britain 1488-1988. The Athlone Press, London.
15. Höglund, H., et. al., 1995. Thermopulp - A New Energy Efficient Mechanical Pulping Process. Sunds Defibrator, Sundsvall.
16. Jasanoff, S., et. al., 1994. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Sage Publ., Thousand Oaks, CA.
17. Kline, S., Rosenberg, N., 1986. An overview of innovation. In: Landau, R., Rosenberg, N. (Eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy - Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 275-305.
18. Laestadius, S., 1995. Competence requirements in low-tech firms. Working Paper, TRITA-IEO R 1995:5. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
19. Laestadius, S., 1996a. År Sverige lågteknologiskt? - reflektioner kring kunskapsbildning och kompetens inom industriell verksamhet (Is Sweden low tech? - reflections on knowledge formation and competence within industrial activities). Research Report, TRITA-IEO R 1996:2. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
20. 2 newsprint per minute and the technology and industry behind it). Research Report, TRITA-IEO R 1996:8. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
21. Laestadius, S., 1998. Technology level, knowledge formation and industrial competence within paper manufacturing. In: Green, Eliasson (Eds.), The Microfoundations of Economic Growth. Univ. of Michigan Press, forthcoming.
22. LU, 1994. A6. Näringslivets tillväxtförutsättningar till 2010 (Conditions for industrial growth to 2010). Långtidsutredningen, bil. 6. Ministry of Finance, Stockholm.
23. Nelson, R., 1990. What has happened to U.S. technological leadership? In: Heiduk, G., Yamamura, K. (Eds.), Technological Competition and Interdependence. Univ. of Washington.
24. OECD, 1993. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data - the Oslo manual. OECD, Paris.
25. OECD, 1994a. Frascati Manual 1993 - proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experimental development. OECD, Paris.
26. OECD, 1994b. Science and Technology Policy - Review and Outlook. OECD, Paris.
27. OECD, 1996a. Industry and Technology - Scoreboard of Indicators 1995. OECD, Paris.
28. OECD, 1996b. Industrial Structure Statistics 1994. OECD, Paris.
29. OECD, 1996c. Innovation, Patents and Technological Strategies. OECD, Paris.
30. OECD, 1996d. Research and Development Expenditure in Industry 1973-1993. OECD, Paris.
31. Ohlsson, L., 1992. R&D For Swedish Industrial Renewal. Ds. 1992:109, Government Office, Stockholm.
32. Ohlsson, L., Vinell, L., 1987. Tillväxtens drivkrafter, Industriförbundets förlag, Stockholm.
33. Ojainmaa, K., 1994. International Competitive Advantage of the Finnish Chemical Forest Industry. ETLA, Helsinki.
34. Patel, Pavitt, K., 1994. The continuing, widespread (and neglected) importance of improvements in mechanical technologies. Research Policy 23, 533-545.
35. Pavitt, K., 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13, 343-373.
36. Peterson, C., 1996. Finsk ingenjörskonst och svenskt imperiebyggande (Finnish engineering and Swedish Empire-building). SNS Förlag, Stockholm.
37. Price, 1970.
38. Rosenberg, N., 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge U.P., Cambridge.
39. Rosenberg, N., 1994. Understanding the adoption of new technology in the forest products industry. In: Rosenberg, N. (Ed.), Exploring the Black Box. Cambridge U.P., Cambridge.
40. Scherer, F.M., 1982. Inter-industry technology flows in the United States. Research Policy 11, 227-245.
41. Scherer, F.M., 1992. International High-Technology Competition. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
42. Schmookler, J., 1950. The interpretation of patent statistics. Journal of Patent Office Society XXXII (2), 123-146.
43. Schmookler, J., 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard U.P., Cambridge, MA.
44. Schuwerk, W., 1996. Shoe presses for writings and printings -concepts and initial operating experience. Mimeo. Woith-Sulzer, Heidenheim.
45. Servain-Schreiber, J.J., 1967-1969. Den Amerikanska Utmaningen. Aldus Bonniers, Stockholm.
46. Sharp, M., 1983. Europe and the New Technologies. Frances Pinter, London.
47. van Hulst, N., Olds, B., 1993. On high-tech snobbery. Research Policy 22, 455-462.
48. van Raan, A.F.J. (Ed.), 1988. Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. North Holland, Amsterdam.
49. Vuori, S., 1995. Technology sources in Finnish manufacturing. Research Report, ETLA, Helsinki.
50. Waluszewski, A., 1990. Framväxten av en ny mekanisk massateknologi (The development of a new mechanical pulping technology). Dissertation, Uppsala.