Comparative clinical and electrometric assessments of the impact of surfactants on forearm skin

Exogenous Dermatology

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 64-69

  Uhoda, Emmanuelle ^a   Paye, Marc ^b   Piérard, Gérald E ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b Advanced Technology Department   (Belgium)

^c CHU SART TILMAN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bioengineering; Capacitance; Hydration; Irritation; Stratum corneum; Surfactant

Indexed keywords

SHAMPOO; SOAP; SURFACTANT; WATER;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEVICE; ERYTHEMA; FOLLOW UP; FOREARM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYDRATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MECHANICAL PROBE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATCH TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN; STRATUM CORNEUM; TECHNIQUE; VOLUNTEER; WATER LOSS;

EID: 0344737952     PISSN: 14244616     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000074108     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Polefka T: Surfactant interactions with skin; in Broze G (ed): Handbook of Detergents. New York, Dekker, 1999, part A: Properties, pp 443-468.
2. Piérard G-E, Goffin V, Hermanns-Lê T, Arrese JE, Piérard-Franchimont C: Surfactant induced dermatitis: A comparison of corneosurfametry with predictive testing on human and reconstructed skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995;33:462-469.
3. Zhai H, Fautz R, Fuchs A, Branco N, Maibach HI: Assessment of the subclinical irritation of surfactants: A screening open assay model. Exog Dermatol 2002;1:238-241.
4. Agner T, Serup J: Sodium lauryl sulfate for irritant patch testing: A dose-response study using bioengineering methods for determination of skin irritation. J Invest Dermatol 1990;95:543-547.
5. Widmer J, Elsner P, Burg G: Skin irritant reactivity following experimental cumulative irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:35-39.
6. Paye M, Simion A, Piérard GE: Dansyl chloride labelling of stratum corneum: Its rapid extraction from skin can predict skin irritation due to surfactants and cleansing products. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30:91-96.
7. Frosch PJ, Kligman AM: The soap chamber test: A new method for assessing irritancy of soaps. J Am Acad Dermatol 1979;1:35-41.
8. Simion AF, Rhein LD: Sequential order of skin response to surfactants during soap chamber test. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25:242-249.
9. Serup J: EEMCO guidance for the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichthyosis: Clinical scoring systems. Skin Res Technol 1995;1:109-114.
10. Berardesca E: EEMCO guidance for the assessment of stratum corneum hydration: Electrical methods. Skin Res Technol 1997;3:126-132.
11. Treffel P, Gabard B: Stratum corneum dynamic function measurements after moisturizer or irritant application. Arch Dermatol Res 1995;287:474-479.
12. Paquet F, Piérard-Franchimont C, Fumal I, Goffin V, Paye M, Piérard GE: Sensitive skin at menopause: Dew point and electrometric properties of the stratum corneum. Maturitas 1998;28:221-227.
13. Claes G, Piérard GE: Biometrological assessment of skin protectors against moderate cold threat. Exog Dermatol 2002;1:92-96.
14. Piérard GE: Instrumental non-invasive assessments of cosmetic efficacy. J Cosmet Dermatol 2002;1:57-58.
15. Paye M, Van de Gaer D, Morrison BM Jr: Corneometry measurements to evaluate skin dryness in the modified soap chamber test. Skin Res Technol 1995;1:123-127.
16. Fluhr JW, Gloor V: Comparative study of five instruments measuring stratum corneum hydration. Skin Res Technol 1999;5:171-178.
17. Morrison MB, Scala D: Comparison of instrumental measurements of skin hydration. J Toxicol Cut Ocular Toxicol 1996;15:305-314.
18. Loden M, Hagforsen E, Lindberg M: The presence of body hair influences the measurements of skin hydration with the Corneometer. Acta Derm Venereol 1995;75:449-450.
19. Goffin V, Piérard-Franchimont C, Piérard GE: Passive sustainable hydration of the stratum corneum following surfactant challenge. Clin Exp Dermatol 1999;24:308-311.