Genetic variations in space and time in Parnassius mnemosyne (L.) (Lepidoptera) populations in north-east Hungary: Implications for conservation

Biological Conservation

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 251-259

  Meglécz, Emese ^a   Nève, Gabriel ^b   Pecsenye, Katalin ^a   Varga, Zoltán ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Mark release recapture; Metapopulation; Parnassius mnemosyne; Population size; Population structure

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; GENETIC VARIATION; POPULATION SIZE; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SPATIAL VARIATION; WOODLAND;

HUNGARY;

INSECTA; LEPIDOPTERA; PARNASSIINAE; PARNASSIUS APOLLO; PARNASSIUS MNEMOSYNE;

EID: 0344699330     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00006-3     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aagaard K., Hanssen O. Population studies of Parnassius mnemosyne (Lepidoptera) in Sunndalen, Norway. Pavlicek-van Beek T., Ovaa A.H., van der Made J.G. Future of Butterflies in Europe. 1992;160-166 Agricultural University, Wageningen.
2. Arnason A.N., Schwarz C.J. POPAN-4: enhancements to a system for the analysis of mark-recapture data from open populations. Journal of Applied Statistics. 22:1995;785-800.
3. Arnason, A. N., Schwarz, C. J., Boyer, G., 1998. POPAN-5: a data maintenance and analysis system for mark-recapture data. Scientific report. Department of Computer Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada, 318 pp.
4. Bijlsma R., Ouborg N.J., van Treuren R. Genetic and phenotypic variation in relation to population size in two plant species: Salvia pratensis and Scabiosa columbaria. Seitz A., Loeschcke V. Species Conservation: A Population-Biological Approach. 1991;89-101 Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.
5. Brakefield P.M. Population dynamics and genetic variation: consequences for the survival of butterflies in a fragmented landscape. Pavlicek-van Beek T., Ovaa A.H., van der Made J.G. Future of Butterflies in Europe. 1992;192-203 Department of Nature Conservation, Agricultural University, Wageningen.
6. Descimon H., Napolitano M. Les populations de Parnassius mnemosyne (Linné) à la Sainte Baume (Bouches-du-Rhône, France): structure génétique, origine et histoire (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Ecologia Mediterranea. 19:1993;15-28.
7. Descimon H., Napolitano M. Enzyme polymorphism, wing pattern variability, and geographical isolation in an endangered butterfly species. Biological Conservation. 66:1993;117-123.
8. Ebert G., Rennwald E. Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württenbergs, Vol. I. 1991;Ulmer, Stuttgart.
9. Endler J.A. Natural Selection in the Wild. 1986;Princeton University Press, Princeton.
10. Heath, J. 1981. Threatened Rhopalocera (Butterflies) in Europe. In: Nature and Environment, Series, No.23. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
11. Hedrick P.W., Gilpin M.E. Genetic effective size of a metapopulation. Hanski I.A., Gilpin M.E. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. 1997;165-181 Academic Press, San Diego.
12. Meglécz E., Pecsenye K., Peregovits L., Varga Z. Allozyme variation in Parnassius mnemosyne (L.) (Lepidoptera) populations in North-East Hungary: variation within a subspecies group. Genetica. 101:1997;59-66.
13. Meglécz E., Pecsenye K., Peregovits L., Varga Z. Effects of population size and fragmentation on the genetic variability of Parnassius mnemosyne populations in North-East Hungary. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 43:1997;183-190.
14. Meglécz E., Pecsenye K., Varga Z., Solignac M. Comparison of differentiation pattern at allozyme and microsatellite loci in Parnassius mnemosyne (Lepidoptera) populations. Hereditas. 128:1998;95-103.
15. Napolitano M., Geiger H., Descimon H. Structure démographique et génétique de quatre populations provençales de Parnassius mnemosyne (Lepidoptera Papilionidae): isolement et polymorphisme dans des populations "menacées" Génétique Sélection Evolution. 20:1988;51-62.
16. Nei M., Tajima F. Genetic drift and estimation of effective population size. Genetics. 98:1981;625-640.
17. Pollak E.et al. A new method for estimating the effective population size from allele frequency changes. Genetics. 104:1983;531-548.
18. Pollard, E., Yates, T., 1993. Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman and Hall, London, 256 pp.
19. Raymond M., Rousset F. GENEPOP (ver.1.2), a population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity. 86:1995;246-249.
20. Schwarz C.J., Arnason A.N. A general methodology for the analysis of capture-recapture experiments in open populations. Biometrics. 52:1996;860-873.
21. Schwarz C.J., Bailey R.E., Irvine J.E., Dalziel F.C. Estimating salmon spawning escapement using capture-recapture methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 50:1993;1181-1197.
22. Slatkin M., Barton N.H. A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution. 43:1989;1349-1368.
23. Soulé M.E. Conservation Biology, the Science of Scarcity and Diversity. 1986;Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
24. Swofford D.L., Selander R.B. BIOSYS-1: A FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. Journal of Heredity. 72:1981;281-283.
25. van Swaay C.A.M., Warren M.S., Grill A., 1997. Threatened butterflies in Europe - provisional report. De Vlinderstichting (Dutch Butterfly Conservation), Wageningen, The Netherlands, report nr. VS 97.25 and British Butterfly Conservation, Warenham, UK.
26. Varga Z. Lepkék (Lepidoptera). Rakonczay Z. Vörös könyv (Red Data Book of Hungary). 1990;188-244 Akadémiai Kiadó Budapest.
27. Waples R.S. A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency. Genetics. 121:1989;379-391.
28. Warren M.S. The ecology and conservation of the heath fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia. II. Adult population structure and mobility. Journal of Applied Ecology. 24:1987;483-498.
29. Warren M.S. The ecology and conservation of the heath fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia. III. Population dynamics and the effect of habitat management. Journal of Applied Ecology. 24:1987;499-513.
30. Weidemann H.J. Tagfalter, band 1. 1986;Verlag J. Neumann-Neudamm, Entwicklung-Lebensweise.
31. Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 38:1984;1358-1370.
32. Willis K.J., Braun M., Sümegi P., Tóth A. Does soil change cause vegetation change or vice versa? A temporal perspective from Hungary. Ecology. 78:1997;740-750.
33. Wright S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, vol. 4, Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. 1978;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.