On the translation of some stimulus features to response force

Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 327-335

  Jaśkowski, Piotr ^a,b   Werner, Iwona ^a   Verleger, Rolf ^b  

^a KAZIMIERZ WIELKI UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arousal; Response force; S R compatibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; BRIGHTNESS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FORCE; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; REACTION TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0344664403     PISSN: 00651400     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Angel A. (1973) Input-output relations in simple reaction time experiments. Q J Exp Psychol 25: 193-200.
2. de Jong R., Liang C.C., Lauber E.S.O. (1994) Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20: 731-750.
3. Greenwald A.G. (1970) Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanisms. Psychol Rev 77: 73-99.
4. Grosjean M., Mordkoff T.J. (2001) Temporal stimulus-response compatibility. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27: 870-878.
5. Hommel B. (1996) The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychol Res 59: 176-186.
6. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC). A framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24: 849-937.
7. Jaśkowski P., Rybarczyk K., Jaroszyk F., Lemański D. (1995) The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task in humans. Acta Neurobiol Exp 55: 57-64.
8. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. (1990) Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97: 253-270.
9. Mansfield R.J.W. (1973) Latency function in human vision. Vision Res 13: 2219-2234.
10. Mattes S., Leuthold H., Ulrich R. (2002) Stimulus-response compatibility in intensity-force relations. Q J Exp Psychol A 55: 1175-1191.
11. Miller J., Ulrich R., Pfaff K. (1991) Visual stimulus intensity does not influence response force. 32nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society: San Francisco, CA.
12. Müsseler J. (1999) How independent from action control is perception? An event-coding account for more-equally-ranked crosstalks. In: Cognitive Contributions to the Perception of Spatial and Temporal Events (Eds. G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann and J. Müsseler). Elsevier Science B.V.
13. Niemi P. (1979) Stimulus intensity effects on auditory and visual reaction processes. Acta Psychol 43: 299-312.
14. Niemi P., Lehtonen E. (1982) Foreperiod and visual stimulus: a reappraisal. Acta Psychol 50: 73-82.
15. Niemi P., Näätänen R. (1981) Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychol Bull 89: 133-162.
16. Nissen M.J. (1977) Stimulus intensity and information processing. Percept Psychophys 22: 338-352.
17. Payne W.H. (1966) Reaction time as a function of retinal location. Vision Res 6: 729-732.
18. Payne W.H. (1967) Visual reaction time on a circle about the fovea. Science 155: 481-482.
19. Prinz W. (1990) A common coding approach to perception and action. In: Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (Eds. O. Neumann and W. Prinz). Springer, Berlin, New York: p. 167-201.
20. Prinz W. (1992) Why don't we perceive our brain states? Eur J Cogn Psychol 4: 1-20.
21. Rains J.D. (1963) Signal luminance and position effects in human reactions time. Vision Res 3: 239-251.
22. Robbins T.W., Everitt B.J. (1995) Arousal systems and attention. In: The Cognitive Neurosciences (Ed. M.S. Gazzaniga). MIT Press Cambridge, London.
23. Romaiguère P., Hasbroucq T., Possamaï C.-A., Seal J. (1993) Intensity to force translation: a new effect of stimulus-response compatibility revealed by analysis of response time and electromyographic activity of a prime mover. Cogn Brain Res 1: 197-201.
24. Sanders A.F. (1975) The foreperiod effect revisited. Q J Exp Psychol 27: 591-598.
25. Sanders A.F. (1983) Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychol 53: 61-97.
26. Sanders A.F., Wertheim M. (1973) The relation between physical stimulus properties and the effect of foreperiod duration on reaction time. Q J Exp Psychol 25: 201-206.
27. Ulrich R., Mattes S. (1996) Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time? Q J Exp Psychol A 49:972-990.
28. Ulrich R., Rinkenauer G., Miller J.O. (1998) Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24: 915-928.
29. Wascher E., Schatz U., Kuder T., Verleger R. (2001) Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27: 731-751.