Dynamics of warbler assemblages during migration

Auk

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 769-780

  Rotenberry, John T ^a   Ray Chandler, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; MIGRATION; PHENOLOGY;

PENNSYLVANIA; UNITED STATES;

EMBERIZINAE; PARULIDAE; PHYLLOSCOPUS SIBILATRIX;

EID: 0344631517     PISSN: 00048038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4089337     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION. 1998. Checklist of North American birds, 7th ed. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
2. AUSTIN, M. P. 1985. Continuum concept, ordination methods, and niche theory. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:39-61.
3. DUNN, E. H., AND D. J. T. HUSSELL. 1995. Using migration counts to monitor landbird populations: Review and evaluation of current status. Current Ornithology 12:43-88.
4. GAUCH, H. G. 1982. Multivariate methods in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
5. GAUCH, H. G., R. H. WHITTAKER, AND S. B. SINGER. 1981. A comparative study of nonmetric ordinations. Journal of Ecology 69:35-152.
6. HAGEN, J. M., T. L. LLOYD-EVANS, AND J. L. ATWOOD. 1991. The relationship between latitude and the timing of spring migration in North American landbirds. Ornis Scandinavica 22:129-136.
7. HILL, M. O. 1974. Correspondence analysis: A neglected multivariate method. Applied Statistics 23:340-354.
8. HILL, M. O., AND H. G. GAUCH. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: An improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47-58.
9. HUSSELL, D. J. T. 1981. The use of migration counts for monitoring bird population levels. Studies in Avian Biology 6:92-102.
10. KOCHMER, J. P., AND S. N. HANDEL. 1986. Constraints and competition in the evolution of flowering phenology. Ecological Monographs 56:303-325.
11. LEBERMAN, R. C., AND D. S. WOOD. 1983. Bird-banding at Powdermill: Twenty years reviewed. Powdermill Nature Reserve Research Report No. 42. Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
12. MCCUNE, B., AND M. J. MEFFORD. 1997. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 3.0. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.
13. PEET, R. K., R. G. KNOX, S. J. CASE, AND R. B. ALLEN. 1988. Putting things in order: The advantages of detrended correspondence analysis. American Naturalist 131:924-934.
14. PIELOU, E. C. 1984. The interpretation of ecological data: A primer on classification and ordination. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
15. RICHARDSON, W. J. 1978. Timing and amount of bird migration in relation to weather: A review. Oikos 30:224-272.
16. ROTENBERRY, J. T. 1990. Variable floral phenology: Temporal resource variation and its implications for flower visitors. Holarctic Ecology 13:1-10.
17. SAS INSTITUTE. 1990. SAS/STAT user's guide, vol. 2, version 6.1, 4th ed. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
18. TER BRAAK, C. J. F. 1985. Correspondence analysis of incidence and abundance data: Properties in terms of a unimodal response model. Biometrics 41:859-873.
19. TER BRAAK, C. J. F., AND I. C. PRENTICE. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 18:271-317.
20. WARTENBERG, D., S. FERSON, AND F. J. ROHLF. 1987. Putting things in order: A critique of detrended correspondence analysis. American Naturalist 129:434-448.
21. WHITTAKER, R. H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 42:207-264.
22. WILSON, M. V., AND C. L. MOHLER. 1983. Measuring compositional change along gradients. Vegetatio 54:129-141.
23. WOODREY, M. S., AND C. R. CHANDLER. 1997. Age-related timing of migration: Geographic and interspecific patterns. Wilson Bulletin 109:52-67.
24. ZAR, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.