Collaboration: An Element Associated with the Success of Four Inclusive High Schools

Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 349-381

  Wallace, Teri ^a   Anderson, Amy R ^a   Bartholomay, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344629764     PISSN: 10474412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532768xjepc1304_05     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arguelles, M. E., Hughes, M. T., & Schumm, J. S. (2000). Coteaching: A different approach to inclusion. Principal, 79, 48, 50-51.
2. Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., & Burden, R. (2000). A survey into mainstream teachers' attitudes toward the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority. Educational Psychology, 20, 191-211.
3. Boudah, D. J., Schumaher, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1997). Collaborative instruction: Is it an effective option for inclusion in secondary classrooms? Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 293-315.
4. Brownell, M. T., Yeager, E., Rennells, M. S., & Riley, T. (1997). Teachers working together: What teacher educators and researchers should know. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20(4), 340-359.
5. Cole, M. C., & McLesky, J. (1997). Secondary inclusion programs for students with mild disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29, 1-15.
6. Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1991). Collaboration in special education: Coming of age in the 1990s. Preventing School Failure, 35, 24-27.
7. Davenport, E. C., & El-Sanhurry, N. A. (1991). Phi/Phimax: Review and synthesis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 821-828.
8. Glasser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
9. Gonzalez, P., & Carlson, E. (2001, April). Preliminary results from the study of personnel needs in special education (SPeNSE). Paper presented at the 9th annual CSPD Conference, Washington, DC. Retrieved June 13, 2002, from http://www.spense.org
10. Hobbs, T., & Westling, D. L. (1998, Sept/Oct). Promoting successful inclusion through collaborative problem-solving. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 12-19.
11. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997. Pub. L. No. 105-17 (1997).
12. Krueger, R., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (1999). The condition of education. Retrieved June 13, 2002, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs99/condition99/Indicator-20.html
15. National Institute of Standards and Technology (1998). Malcolm Baldrige national quality award: 1998 education criteria for performance excellence. Gaithersburg, MD: Author.
16. No Child Left Behind Act. Reauthorization of the elementary and secondary education act. Pub. L. 107-110 §2102(4) (2001).
17. Olson, M. R., Chalmers, L., & Hoover, J. H. (1997). Attitudes and attributes of general education teachers identified as effective inclusionists. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 28-35.
18. QSR Pty Ltd. (1997). QSR NUD*IST Users Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Soft-ware.
19. Rainforth, B., & England, J. (1997). Collaborations for inclusion. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 85-104.
20. Study of Personnel Needs in Special Education (SPeNSE). (2001). General education teachers' role in special education. Retrieved December 31, 2001, from http://www.spense.org/Results.html
21. Tralli, R., Colombo, B., Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1996). The strategies intervention model: A model for supported inclusion at the secondary level. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 204-216.
22. Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1994). Middle school teachers' planning for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 152-161.
23. Wallace, T. (2002). The role of teachers and administrators in supervising paraeducators. In T. Wallace, A. L. Pickett, & M. Likins, IMPACT: features issue on paraeducators supporting students with disabilities. Minneapolis: Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.
24. Wallace, T., & Bartholorhay, T. (2000). Beacons teacher survey literature review. Unpublished manuscript, Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
25. Ysseldyke, J. E., Thurlow, M. L., & Gilman, C. (1993a, January). Educational outcomes and indicators for students completing school. Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota.
26. Ysseldyke, J. E., Thurlow, M. L., & Gilman, C. (1993b, May). Educational outcomes and indicators for individuals at the post-school level. Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Out-comes, University of Minnesota.
27. Zigmond, N. & Baker, J. (1990). Mainstream experiences for learning disabled students (Project MELD): Preliminary report. Exceptional Children, 57, 176-185.