Claw morphology, prey size selection and foraging efficiency in generalist and specialist shell-breaking crabs

Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology

Volumn 220, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 191-211

  Behrens Yamada, Sylvia ^a   G Boulding, Elizabeth ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Cancer oregonensis; Cancer productus; Foraging efficiency; Hemigrapsus nudus; Littorina sitkana; Lophopanopeus bellus; Predation

Indexed keywords

CLAE MORPHOLOGY; CLAW MORPHOLOGY; CRAB; FORAGING EFFICIENCY; INTERTIDAL ZONE; PREY SIZE SELECTION;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CORRELATION FUNCTION; CRAB; ECOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PREDATION; SNAIL;

USA, WASHINGTON, SAN JUAN ISLAND;

CANCER OREGONENSIS; CANCER PRODUCTUS; DECAPODA; GASTROPODA; HEMIGRAPSUS NUDUS; LITTORINA SITKANA; LOPHOPANOPEUS BELLUS;

EID: 0344625383     PISSN: 00220981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00122-6     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abby-Kalio N.J., Warner G.F. Effects of two different feeding regimes on the chela closer muscles of the shore crab Carcinus maenas (L.). Mar. Behav. Physiol. 11:1984;209-218.
2. Alexander, R.McN., 1968. Animal Mechanics, Sedgewick and Jackson, London.
3. Atwood H.L. An attempt to account for the diversity of crustacean muscles. Am. Zool. 13:1973;357-378.
4. Behrens Yamada S. Geographic range limitation of the intertidal gastropods Littorina sitkana and L. planaxis. Mar. Biol. 39:1977;61-65.
5. Behrens Yamada S. Are direct developers more locally adapted than planktonic developers? Mar. Biol. 103:1989;403-411.
6. Behrens Yamada S., Boulding E.G. The role of highly mobile crab predators in the intertidal zonation of their gastropod prey. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 204:1996;59-83.
7. Behrens Yamada S., Metcalf S.H., Baldwin B.C. Predation by the crab, Cancer oregonensis, inside oyster trays. J. Shellfish Res. 12:1993;89-92.
8. Behrens Yamada S., Navarrette S.A., Needham C. Predation induced changes in behavior and growth rate in three populations of the intertidal snail, Littorina sitkana (Philippi). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 220:1998;213-226.
9. Benkman C.W. Adaptation to single resources and the evolution of crossbill (Loxia) diversity. Ecol. Monogr. 63:1993;305-325.
10. Benkman C.W., Lindholm A.K. The advantages and evolution of morphological novelty. Nature. 349:1991;519-520.
11. Bernard, F.R., 1979. The food of Hecate Strait crabs, August 1977. Manuscript Report, Fish. and Mar. Ser. Canada 1464, pp. 1-23.
12. Bertness M.D., Cunningham C. Crab shell-crushing predation and gastropod architectural defense. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 65:1981;47-65.
13. Boulding E.G. Crab-resistant features of shells of burrowing bivalves: Decreasing vulnerability by increasing handling time. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 76:1984;201-223.
14. Boulding E.G., Buckland-Nicks J., Van Alstyne K.L. Morphological and allozyme variation in Littorina sitkana and related Littorina species from the Northeastern Pacific. Veliger. 36:1993;43-68.
15. Boulding E.G., Hay T.K. Crab response to prey density can result in density-dependent mortality of clams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41:1984;521-535.
16. Boulding E.G., LaBarbera M. Fatigue damage: Repeated loading enables crabs to open larger bivalves. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole Mass. 171:1986;538-547.
17. Brown S.C., Cassuto S.R., Loos R.W. Biomechanics of chelipeds in some decapod crustaceans. J. Zool., Lond. 188:1979;143-159.
18. Cunningham P.N., Hughes R.N. Learning of predatory skills by shorecrabs Carcinus maenas feeding on mussels and dogwhelks. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 16:1984;21-26.
19. Eggleston D.B. Foraging behavior of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus, on juvenile oysters, Crassostrea virginica: Effects of prey density and size. Bull. Mar. Sci. 46:1990;62-82.
20. Elner, R.W., 1978. The mechanics of predation by the shore crab, Carcinus maenas (L) on the edible mussel, Mytilus edulis (L), Oecologia 36, 333-344.
21. Elner R.W., Campbell A. Force, function, and mechanical advantage in the claw of the American lobster Homarus americanus (Decapoda: Crustacea). J. Zool. London. 173:1981;395-406.
22. Elner R.W., Hughes R.N. Energy maximization in the diet of the shore crab Carcinus maenas. J. Animal Ecol. 47:1978;103-116.
23. Gosner, K.L., 1979. A field guide to the Atlantic seashore from the Bay of Fundy to Cape Hatteras. The Peterson Field Guide Series, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 329 pp.
24. Holling C.S. The analysis of complex population processes. Can. Entomol. 96:1964;335-347.
25. Hughes R.N. Foraging behavior of a tropical crab: Ozius verreauxii. Proc. R. Soc. London. 237B:1989;201-212.
26. Juanes F., Hartwick E.B. Prey size selection in Dungeness crabs: The effect of claw damage. Ecology. 77:1990;744-758.
27. Kaiser M.J., Hughes R.N., Reid D.G. Chelal morphology, prey-size selection and aggressive competition in green and red forms of Carcinus maenas (L). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 140:1990;121-134.
28. Knudsen J.W. Observations of the reproductive cycles and ecology of the common Brachyura and crab-like Anomura of Puget Sound, WA. Pacific Sci. 18:1964;3-33.
29. Kozloff, E.N., 1983. Seashore Life of the northern Pacific Coast, An illustrated guide to Northern California, Oregon, Washington and British Columbia. University Washington Press, Seattle, 370 pp.
30. Lawton P., Hughes R.N. Foraging behavior of the crab Cancer pagurus feeding on the gastropods Nucella lapillus and Littorina littorea: Comparisons with optimum foraging theory. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 27:1985;143-154.
31. Lawton, P., Lavalli, K.L., 1995. Postlarval, juvenile, adolescent and adult ecology. In: Factor J.R. (Ed.), Biology of the Lobster Hommarus Americanus. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 47-88.
32. Maret T.J., Collins J.P. Effect of prey vulnerability on population size structure of a gape-limited predator. Ecology. 77:1996;320-324.
33. Menge B.A. Foraging strategy of a starfish in relation to actual prey availability and environmental predictability. Ecol. Monogr. 42:1972;25-40.
34. Orensanz J.M., Gallucci V.F. Comparative study of postlarval life-history schedules in four sympatric species of Cancer (Decapoda: Brachyura: Cancridae). J. Crust. Biol. 8:1988;187-220.
35. Paine R.T. The Pisaster-Tegula interaction: Prey patches, predator food preference, and intertidal community structure. Ecology. 50:1969;950-961.
36. Paine R.T. Size-limited predation: An observational and experimental approach with the Mytilus-Pisaster interaction. Ecology. 57:1976;858-873.
37. Palmer A.R. Adaptive value of shell variation in Thais lamellosa: Effect of thick shells on vulnerability to and preference by crabs. Veliger. 27:1985;349-356.
38. Persson L., Anderson J., Wahlström E., Eklöv P. Size-specific interactions in lake systems: Predator gape limitation and prey growth rate and mortality. Ecology. 77:1996;900-911.
39. Quayle, D.B., 1988. Pacific oyster culture in British Columbia. Fish. Res. Board Canada, Bulletin 218, 241 pp.
40. Robles C., Sweetham D.A., Dittman D. Diel variation of intertidal foraging by Cancer productus in British Columbia. J. Nat. Hist. 23:1989;1041-1049.
41. Sanchez-Salazar M.E., Griffiths C.L., Seed R. The interactive roles of predation and tidal elevation in structuring populations of the edible cockle. Cerastoderma edule. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 25:1987;245-260.
42. Seed, R., 1993. Crabs as predators of marine bivalve molluscs. In: Morton, B. (Ed.), Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on the Marine Biology of the South China Sea. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong, pp. 393-418.
43. Seed R., Hughes R.N. Criteria for prey-selection in molluscivorous crabs with contrasting claw morphologies. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 193:1995;177-195.
44. Schluter D. Seed and patch selection by Galapagos ground finches: Relation to foraging efficiency and food supply. Ecology. 63:1982;1106-1120.
45. Sousa W.P. Size-dependent predation on the salt-marsh snail Cerithidea californica Hademan. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 166:1993;19-37.
46. Smith D.L., Palmer A.R. Effects of manipulating diet on size and performance of brachyuran crab claws. Science. 264:1994;710-712.
47. Vermeij G.J. Interoceanic differences in vulnerability of shelled prey to crab predation. Science. 260:1976;135-136.
48. Wainwright P. Biomechanical limits to ecological performance: Mollusc-crushing by the Caribbean hogfish, Lachnolaimus maximus (Labridae). J. Zool., London. 213:1987;283-297.
49. Walker S., Behrens Yamada S. Implications for the gastropod fossil record of mistaken crab predation on empty mollusc shells. Palaeontology. 36:1993;735-741.
50. Warner, G.F., 1977. The Biology of Crabs, Elek Science, London.
51. Warner G.F., Jones A.R. Leverage and muscle type in crab chelae (Crustacea: Brachyura). J. Zool., Lond. 180:1976;57-68.
52. West D.L., Williams A.H. Predation by Callinectes sapidus within Spartina alterniflora marshes. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 100:1986;75-95.
53. Zipser E., Vermeij G.J. Crushing behavior of tropical and temperate crabs. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 31:1978;155-172.