Cine film replacement: Digital archival requirements and remaining obstacles

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 346-356

  Holmes Jr , David R ^a   Wondrow, Merrill A ^a   Bell, Malcolm R ^a   Nissen, Steven E ^b   Cusma, Jack T ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiography; Cine film replacement; Digital imaging

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; COMPACT DISK; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEM; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 0344589336     PISSN: 00986569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199807)44:3<346::AID-CCD23>3.0.CO;2-H     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Holmes D, Wondrow M: Isn't it about time to abandon cine film? Cath Cardiovasc Diagn 20:1-4, 1990.
2. Cusma JT, Bashore TM: The digital catheterization laboratory -is it practical today? In: Reiber JHC, van der Waal EE (eds): "Cardiovascular Imaging." Boston: Kluwer, 1996, pp 157-159.
3. Lewis RP: Developing standards for the digital age: The DICOM project. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1631-1632, 1996.
4. Brennecke R, Lang M, Fritsch JP, Erbel R, Meyer J: A framework for PACS development in cardiology. Comput Cardiol 1992:259-261.
5. American College of Cardiology Catheterization Committee: Cardiac angiography without cinefilm: Erecting a "Tower of Babel" in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 24:834-837, 1994.
6. ACC/ACR/NEMA Ad Hoc Group: American College of Cardiology, American College of Radiology, and industry develop standard for digital transfer of angiographic images. J Am Coll Cardiol 25:800-802, 1995.
7. Parisot C: The DICOM standard. A breakthrough for digital information exchange in cardiology. Int J Card Imaging 11 (Suppl 3):171-177, 1995.
8. Reiber JH, Koning G, van der Zwet PM, Schiemank L: Inaccuracy of quantitative coronary arteriography when analyzed from S-VHS videotape. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 37:32-38, 1996.
9. Simon R, Brennecke R, Hess O, Meier B, Reiber H, Zeeleuberg C: Report of the ESC Task Force on Digital Imaging in Cardiology. Recommendations for digital imaging in angioacardiography. Europ Heart J 15:1332-1334, 1994.
10. Condit PB: Requirements for cardiac interchange media and the role of recordable CD. Int J Card Imaging 11(Suppl 3):153-157, 1995.
11. Bidgood WD Jr., Horii SC: Introdution to the ACR-NEMA DICOM standard. Radiographics 12:345-355, 1992.
12. Hammond WE: The role of standards in creating a health informatin infrastructure. Int J Biomed Comput 34:29-44, 1994.
13. st Century: A Primer." The American College of Cardiology, 1997.
14. Holmes DR, Jr., Wondrow MA: Cost and cine filem replacement.
15. st Century: A Primer." The American College of Cardiology, 1997.
16. Rabbani M, Jones PW: Image compression techniques for medical diagnostic images. J Digital Imaging 4:65-78, 1991.
17. Rigolin VH, Robbiolio PA, Spero LA, Harrawood BP, Morris KG, Fortin DF, Baker WA, Bashore TM, Cusma JT: Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity. Am J Cardiol 78:131-135, 1996.
18. Baker WA, Hearne SE, Spero LA, Morris KG, Harrington RA, Sketch MH Jr, Behar VS, Kong Y, Peter RH, Bashore TM, Harrison JK, Cusma JT: Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. Circulation 96:1157-1164, 1997.
19. Koning G, van der Meurs BA, Haas H, Reiber JH: Effect of data compression on quantitative coronary measurements. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 34:175-185, 1995.