Long-term analysis of conventional coronary balloon angioplasty and an initial 'stent-like' result: The NHLBI PTCA registry

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 590-595

  Holmes Jr , David R ^a   Kip, Kevin E ^b   Yeh, Wanlin ^b   Kelsey, Sheryl F ^b   Detre, Katherine M ^b   Williams, David O ^c  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEATH; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTENOSIS; STENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CAUSE OF DEATH; COHORT STUDIES; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; RECURRENCE; REGISTRIES; RETREATMENT; STENTS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0344588772     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00285-X     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. de Muinck E.D., den Heijer P., van Dijk R.B., et al. Autoperfusion balloon versus stent for acute or threatened closure during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 74:1994;1002-1005.
2. Lincoff A.M., Topol E.J., Chapekis A.T., et al. Intra coronary stenting compared with conventional therapy for abrupt vessel closure complicating coronary angioplasty a matched case-control study . J Am Coll Cardiol. 21:1993;866-875.
3. Roubin G.S., Cannon A.D., Agrawal S.K., et al. Intra coronary stenting for acute and threatened closure complicating percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 85:1992;916-927.
4. Serruys P.W., de Jaegere P., Kiemeneij F., et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation and balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease Benestent Study Group . N Engl J Med. 331:1994;489-495.
5. Fischman D.L., Leon M.B., Baim D.S., et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 331:1994;496-501.
6. Macaya C., Serruys P.W., Ruygrok P., et al. Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty one year clinical follow-up of Benestent trial . J Am Coll Cardiol. 27:1996;255-261.
7. Versaci F., Gaspardone A., Tomai F., et al. A comparison of coronary-artery stenting with angioplasty for isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 336:1997;817-822.
8. Kuntz R.E., Gibson C.M., Nobuyoshi M., Baim D.S. Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting, and directional atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 21:1993;15-25.
9. Haude M., Erbel R., Issa H., Meid C., Meyer J. Quantitative analysis of elastic recoil after balloon angioplasty and after intra coronary implantation of balloon-expandable Palmaz-Schatz stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 21:1993;26-34.
10. Di Luzio V., De Remigis F., De Curtis G., et al. Coronary restenosis after optimal (stent-like) initial angiographic results obtained by traditional balloon angioplasty. Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia. 27:1997;645-653.
11. Rupprecht H.J., Espinola-Klein C., Brennecke R., Meyer J. Ten-year follow-up of patients with optimal ("stent-like"), suboptimal or failed coronary angioplasty. Supplement to Circulation. 96:1997;455. (Abstr).
12. Holmes D.R. Jr, Holubkov R., Vlietstra R.E., et al. Comparison of complications during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty from 1977 to 1981 and from 1985 to 1986 the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry . J Am Coll Cardiol. 12:1988;1149-1155.
13. Detre K., Holubkov R., Kelsey S., et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985-1986 and 1977-1981 The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registry . N Engl J Med. 318:1988;265-270.
14. Detre K., Holubkov R., Kelsey S., et al. One-year follow-up results of the 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. Circulation. 80:1989;421-428.
15. Detre K., Yeh W., Kelsey S., et al. Has improvement in PTCA intervention affected long-term prognosis? The NHLBI PTCA Registry Experience . Circulation. 91:1995;2868-2875.
16. Mancini G.B., Simon S.B., McGillem M.J., LeFree M.T., Friedman H.Z., Vogel R.A. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method . Circulation. 75:1987;452-460.
17. Kronmal R.A., Davis K., Fisher L.D., Jones R.A., Gillespie M.J. Data management for a large collaborative clinical trial (CASS: Coronary Artery Surgery Study). Comp Biomed Res. 11:1978;553-566.
18. Blackburn H. Classification of the electrocardiogram for population studies Minnesota Code . J Electrocardiol. 2:1969;305-310.
19. Bourassa M.G. Complete versus incomplete revascularization after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Ellis S.G., Holmes D.R. Strategic Approaches in Coronary Intervention. 1995;440-444 Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
20. Bourassa M.G., Holubkov R., Yeh W., Detre K.M. Strategy of complete revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (A report from the 1985-1986 NHLBI PTCA Registry). Am J Cardiol. 70:1992;174-178.
21. Kaplan E.L., Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 53:1958;457-481.
22. Cox D.R. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Statist Soc B. 74:1972;187-220.
23. Ayala F.P., Bernardi V.H., Marchand E.M., et al. Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty versus stent (OCBAS) angiographic long term follow up results of a randomized trial . Supplement to Circulation. 96:1997;593. (Abstr).
24. Ambrose J.A., Tannenbaum M.A., Alexopoulas D., et al. Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 12:1988;56-62.
25. Little W.C., Constantinescu M., Applegate R.J., et al. Can coronary angiography predict the site of subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation. 78:1988;1157-1166.
26. Strauss B.H., Escaned J., Foley D.P., et al. Technologic considerations and practical limitations in the use of quantitative angiography during percutaneous coronary recanalization. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 36:1994;343-362.