Network Influences on Scholarly Communication in Developmental Dyslexia: A Longitudinal Follow-up

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 14, 2003, Pages 1278-1295

  Perry, Claudia A ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIBLIOGRAPHIC RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

COCITATION ANALYSIS; INTELLECTUAL STRUCTURES; NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 0344585372     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.10336     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. About the International Dyslexia Association. (1996-2002). Retrieved August 8, 2002, from the International Dyslexia Association® Web site: http://www.interdys.org/servlet/compose?section_id= 1&page_id=1
2. Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organizational structures. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 217-230.
3. Anderson, J.G., Jay, S.J., Schweer, H.M., Anderson, M.M., & Kassing, D. (1985). Physician communication networks and the adoption and utilization of computer applications in medicine. In J.G. Anderson & S.J. Jay (Eds.), Use and impact of computers in clinical medicine (pp. 185-199). New York: Springer-Verlag.
4. Boder, E. (1970). Developmental dyslexia. A new diagnostic approach based on the identification of three subtypes. Journal of School Health, 40(6), 289-290.
5. Boder, E. (1973). Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 15(5), 663-687.
6. Boder, E., & Jarrico, S. (1982). The Boder test of reading-spelling patterns: A diagnostic screening test for subtypes of reading disability. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
7. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (1992). UCINET IV. Columbia: Analytic Technologies.
8. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (1999-2002). UCINET 5.2. Natick: Analytic Technologies.
9. Borgman, C.L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72.
10. Bourke, P., & Butler, L. (1998). Institutions and the map of science: Matching university departments and fields of research [Electronic version]. Research Policy, 26, 711-718.
11. Brainard, J. (2002, June 14). U.S. agencies look to interdisciplinary science. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(40), p. A20. [Electronic version]. Retrieved August 13, 2002, from the Academic Search Premier database, Item 6843484.
12. Breiger, R.L. (1976). Career attributes and network structure: A block-model study of a biomedical research specialty. American Sociological Review, 41(February), 117-135.
13. Cardon, L.R., Smith, S.D., Fulker, D.W., Kimberling, W.J., Pennington, B.F., & DeFries, J.C. (1994). Quantitative trait locus for reading disability on chromosome 6. Science, 266(5183), 276-279.
14. Chitiri, H.F., & Willows, D.M. (1994). Word recognition in two languages and orthographies: English and Greek. Memory and Cognition, 22(3), 313-325.
15. Cole, S. (1992). Making science: Between nature and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Cole, S. (2000). The role of journals in the growth of scientific knowledge. In B. Cronin & H.B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 109-142). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
17. Duffy, F.H., Denckla, M.B., McAnulty, G.B., & Holmes, J.A. (1988). Neurophysiological studies in dyslexia. Research Publications- Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease, 66, 149-170.
18. Duncan, C.C., Rumsey, J.M., Wilkniss, S.M., Denckla, M.B., Hamburger, S.D., & Odou-Potkin, M. (1994). Developmental dyslexia and attention dysfunction in adults: Brain potential indices of information processing. Psychophysiology, 31(4), 386-401.
19. Eden, G.F., Stein, J.F., Wood, H.M., & Wood, F.B. (1995a). Verbal and visual problems in reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(5), 272-290.
20. Eden, G.F., Stein, J.F., Wood, H.M., & Wood, F.B. (1995b). Temporal and spatial processing in reading disabled and normal children. Cortex, 31(3), 451-468.
21. Eden, G.F., Van Meter, J.W., Rumsey, J.M., & Zeffiro, T.A. (1996). The visual deficit theory of developmental dyslexia. Neuroimage, 4(3 Pt 3), S108-S117.
22. Edge, D. (1979). Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review. History of Science, 7, 102-134.
23. Edge, D. (1995). Reinventing the wheel. In S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 3-23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Ellis, D., Allen, D., & Wilson, T. (1999). Information science and information systems: Conjunct subjects disjunct disciplines [Electronic version]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1095-1107.
25. Farmer, M.E., & Klein, R.M. (1995). The evidence for a temporal processing deficit linked to dyslexia: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2(4), 460-493.
26. Fisher, S.E., Francks, C., Marlow, A.J., MacPhie, I.L., Newbury, D.F., Cardon, L.R., Ishikawa-Brush, Y., Richardson, A.J., Talcott, J.B., Gayan, J., Olson, R.K., Pennington, B.F., Smith, S.D., DeFries, J.C., Stein, J.F., & Monaco, A.P. (2002). Independent genome-wide scans identify a chromosome 18 quantitative-trait locus influencing dyslexia. Nature Genetics, 30(1), 86-91.
27. Fletcher, J.M., & Satz, P. (1979a). Has Vellutino led us astray? A rejoinder to a reply. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 168-171.
28. Fletcher, J.M., & Satz, P. (1979b). Unitary deficit hypotheses of reading disabilities: Has Vellutino led us astray? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 156-159.
29. Fletcher, J.M., Espy, K.A., Francis, D.J., Davidson, K.C., Rourke, B.P., & Shaywitz, S.E. (1989). Comparisons of cutoff and regression-based definitions of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(6), 334-338, 355.
30. Galaburda, A.M. (1993). Neurology of developmental dyslexia. Current Opinion in Neurology and Neurosurgery, 6, 237-242.
31. Galaburda, A.M., Menard, M.T., & Rosen, G.D. (1994). Evidence for aberrant auditory anatomy in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 8010-8013.
32. Gayan, J., Smith, S.D., Cherny, S.S., Cardon, L.R., Fulker, D.W., Brower, A.M., Olson, R.K., Pennington, B.F., & DeFries, J.C. (1999). Quantitative-trait locus for specific language and reading deficits on chromosome 6p. American Journal of Human Genetics, 64(1), 157-164.
33. Gilbert, G.N. (1976). The transformation of research findings into scientific knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 6, 281-306.
34. Hill, G.T., & Raymond, J.E. (2002). Deficits of motion transparency perception in adult developmental dyslexics with normal unidirectional motion sensitivity. Vision Research, 42(9), 1195-1203.
35. Hurd, J.M. (1992). Interdisciplinary research in the sciences: Implications for library organization. College and Research Libraries, 53, 283-297.
36. Kaplan, D.E., Gayan, J., Ahn, J., Won, T.W., Pauls, D., Olson, R.K., DeFries, J.C., Wood, F., Pennington, B.F., Page, G.P., Smith, S.D., & Gruen, J.R. (2002). Evidence for linkage and association with reading disability on 6p21.3-22. American Journal of Human Genetics, 70(5), 1287-1298.
37. Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J.H. (1982). Network analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Lehmkuhle, S., Garzia, R.P., Turner, L., Hash, T., & Baro, J.A. (1993). A defective visual pathway in children with reading disability. New England Journal of Medicine, 328, 989-996.
41. Liebeskind, J.P., Oliver, A.L., Zucker, L., & Brewer, M. (1996). Social networks, learning and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms [Electronic version]. Organization Science 7(4), 428-443.
42. Lievrouw, L.A. (1990). Reconciling structure and process in the study of scholarly communication. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 59-69). Newbury Park: Sage.
43. Lievrouw, L.A., Rogers, E.M., Lowe, C.U., & Nadel, E. (1987). Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists. Social Networks, 9, 217-248.
44. Livingstone, M.S., Rosen, G.D., Drislane, F.W., & Galaburda, A.M. (1991). Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 88, 7943-7947.
45. Lovegrove, W., Martin, F., & Slaghuis, W. (1986). A theoretical and experimental case for a visual deficit in specific reading disability. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 225-267.
46. Lyon, G.R. (1995a). Research initiatives in learning disabilities: Contributions from scientists supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Journal of Child Neurology, 10(Suppl 1), S1200-S1126.
47. Lyon, G.R. (1995b). Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 3-21.
48. Lyon, G.R. (2001). Acceptance of the Samual Torrey Orton Award, November 2000, Washington, DC. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 3-7.
49. Lyon, G.R., & Alexander, D. (1999-2002). NICHD Research Program in Learning Disabilities. Retrieved August 13, 2002, from the National Center for Learning Disabilities Web site: http://www.ncld.org/news/archives/TW/lyon97.cfm
50. Mahlck, P. (2001). Mapping gender differences in scientific careers in social and bibliometric space. Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(2), 167. Retrieved July 6, 2002, from Academic Search Premier database, Item no. 4274324.
51. McCain, K.W. (1984). Longitudinal author cocitation mapping: The changing structure of macroeconomics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35, 351-359.
52. McCain, K.W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 433-443.
53. Metzger, N., & Zare, R. (1999, January 29). Interdisciplinary research: From belief to reality. Science, 283(5402), 642. Retrieved August 13, 2002, from Academic Search Premier database, Item no. 4274324.
54. Michaelson, A.G. (1993). The development of a scientific specialty as diffusion through social relations: The case of role analysis. Social Networks, 15, 217-236.
55. Mulkay, M.J. (1977). Sociology of the scientific research community. In I. Spiegel-Rosing & D. de S. Price (Eds.), Science, technology and society: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 93-148). Beverly Hills: Sage.
56. Mulkay, M.J., Gilbert, G.N., & Woolgar, S. (1975). Problem areas and research networks in science. Sociology, 9, 187-203.
57. Mullins, N.C., Hargens, L.L., Hecht, P.K., & Kick, E.L. (1977). The group structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study. American Sociological Review, 42(August), 552-562.
58. Paisley, W. (1990). An oasis where many trails cross: The improbable cocitation networks of a multidiscipline. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 459-468.
59. Palmer, C.L. (1999). Structures and strategies of interdisciplinary science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 242-253.
60. Pennington, B.F. (1991). Diagnosing learning disorders: A neuropsychological framework. New York: Guilford Press.
61. Pennington, B.F., Gilger, J.W., Olson, R.K., & DeFries, J.C. (1992). The external validity of age- versus IQ-discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Lessons from a twin study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(9), 562-573.
62. Perry, C.A., & Rice, R.E. (1998). Scholarly communication in developmental dyslexia: Influence of network structure on change in a hybrid problem area. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(2), 151-168.
63. Perry, C.A., & Rice, R.E. (1999). Network influences on involvement in the hybrid problem area of developmental dyslexia. Science Communication, 21(1), 38-74.
64. Pierce, S.J. (1990). Disciplinary work and interdisciplinary areas: Sociology and bibliometrics. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 46-58). Newbury Park: Sage.
65. Pierce, S.J. (1999). Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 271-279.
66. Rappa, M.A., & Debackere, K. (1995). An analysis of entry and persistence among scientists in an emerging field. R&D Management, 25, 323-341.
67. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., & Bilsky, A.B. (1995). Can a temporal processing deficit account for dyslexia. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2(4), 501-507.
68. Research articles. (©1996-2002). Retrieved August 8, 2002, from the International Dyslexia Association® Web site: http://www.interdys.org/servlet/researcharticle
69. Research in the field. (©1996-2002). Retrieved August 8, 2002, from the International Dyslexia Association® Web site: http://www.interdys.org/servlet/inthefield?grant_yr=2001-2002
70. Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
71. Shaywitz, S.E. (1996). Dyslexia. Scientific American, 275(5), 98-104.
72. Shaywitz, S.E. (1998). Dyslexia. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(5), 307-312.
73. Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J.M., & Escobar, M.D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. JAMA, 264, 998-1002.
74. Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J., & Shupack, H. (1986). Evaluation of school performance: Dyslexia and attention deficit disorder. Pediatrician, 13(2-3), 96-107.
75. Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., Pugh, K.R., Fulbright, R.K., Constable, R.T., Mencl, W.E., Shankweiler, D.P., Liberman, A.M., Skudlarski, P., Fletcher, J.M., Katz, L., Marchione, K.E., Lacadie, C., Gatenby, C., & Gore, J.C. Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 95(5), 2636-2641.
76. Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S.E., Pugh, K.R., Mencl, W.E., Fulbright, R.K., Skudlarski, P., Constable, R.T., Marchione, K.E., Fletcher, J.M., Lyon G.R., & Gore, J.C. (2002). Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia. Biological Psychiatry, 52(2), 101-110.
77. Skottun, B.C. (2000a). On the conflicting support for the magnocellular-deficit theory of dyslexia: Response to Stein, Talcott and Walsh (2000) [Electronic version]. Trends in Cognitive Neurosciences, 4(6), 211-212.
78. Skottun, B.C. (2000b). The magnocellular deficit theory of dyslexia: The evidence from contrast sensitivity. Vision Research, 40(1), 111-127. Retrieved June 18, 2002, from Science Direct database.
79. Stanovich, K.E. (1985). Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms of psychological processes: What have we learned? Annals of Dyslexia, 35, 67-96.
80. StatSoft, Inc. (1984-2003). Electronic statistics textbook. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft. Web site: http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/stathome.html
81. Stein, J.F. (Ed.). (1991). Vision and visual dysfunction: Vol. 13. Vision and visual dyslexia. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
82. Stein, J., Talcott, J., & Walsh, V. (2000). Controversy about the visual magnocellular deficity in developmental dyslexia [Electronic version]. Trends in Cognitive Neurosciences, 4(6), 209-211.
83. Stewart, J.A. (1990). Drifting continents and colliding paradigms: Perspective on the geoscience revolution. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
84. Stuart, G.W., McAnally, K.I., & Castles, A. (2001). Can contrast sensitivity functions in dyslexia be explained by inattention rather than a magnocellular deficit? Vision Research, 41(24), 3205-3211.
85. Tallal, P., Galaburda, A.M., Llinas, R.R., & von Euler, C. (Eds.). (1993). Temporal information processing in the nervous system: Special reference to dyslexia and dysphasia (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 682). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
86. Two distinguished addresses. (2001). Annals of Dyslexia 51, 1-2.
87. Vellutino, F.R. (1979). The validity of perceptual deficit explanations of reading disability: A reply to Fletcher and Satz, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 160-167.
88. Vellutino, F.R. (1987). Dyslexia. Scientific American, 256(3), 34-41.
89. Vellutino, F.R., Steger, B.M., Moyer, S.C., Harding, C.J., & Niles, J.A. (1977). Has the perceptual deficit hypothesis led us astray? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10, 375-385.
90. Walker, A., Jr. (Ed.). (1994). Thesaurus of psychological index terms. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
91. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
92. Watson, C., & Willows, D.M. (1995). Information-processing patterns in specific reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(4), 216-231.
93. Weedman, J. (1992). Informal and formal channels in boundary-spanning communication [Electronic version]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(3), 257-267.
94. White, H.D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (pp. 84-106). Newbury Park: Sage.
95. White, H.D. (2000). Toward ego-centered citation analysis. In B. Cronin & H.B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge: A Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 475-496). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
96. White, H.D., & McCain, K.W. (1997). Visualization of literatures. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 32, 99-168.
97. White, H.D., & McCain, K.W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
98. Willows, D.M. (1991). Visual processes in learning disabilities. In B.Y.L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 163-193). New York: Academic Press.
99. Wright, B.A., Bowen, R.W., & Zecker, S.G. (2000). Nonlinguistic perceptual deficits associated with reading and language disorders [Electronic version]. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 10(4), 482-486.