What's Kuhn got to do with it?

Social Epistemology

Volumn 17, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 229-239

  Mirowski, Philip E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344551842     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0269172032000144225     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. CALDWELL, B., 1991, Clarifying Popper. Journal of Economic Literature, 29, 1-33.
2. CANEVA, K., 2000, Possible Kuhns in the history of science: anomalies of incommensurable paradigms. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 31, 87-124.
3. FORTUN, M. and SCHWEBER, S., 1993, Scientists and the legacy of WWII. Social Studies of Science, 23, 595-642.
4. FULLER, S., 1998, Science (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
5. FULLER, S., 2000a, Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
6. FULLER, S., 2000b, Why science studies has never been critical of science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 30, 5-32.
7. FULLER, S., 2000c, The Governance of Science (Buckingham: Open University Press).
8. GIGERENZER, G., 2000, Adaptive Thinking (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
9. HACKING, I., 2000, Review of Paul Feyerabend's Conquest of Abundance. London Review of Books, 22 June, 28-29.
10. HERSHBERG, J., 1993, James B. Conant: Harvard to Hiroshima (New York: Knopf).
11. HOLLINGER, D., 2000, Paradigms lost. New York Times Book Review, 28 May, 23.
12. HORGAN, J., 1996, The End of Science (Reading, MA: Addison Wesley).
13. HORWICH, P. (ed.), 1993, World Changes (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
14. HUGHES, T. and HUGHES, A. (eds), 2000, Systems, Experts and Computers (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
15. JARVIE, I., 1988, Explanation, reduction and the sociological turn in the philosophy of science, or Kuhn as ideologue for Merton's theory of science. In G. Radnitzsky (ed.), Centripetal Forces in the Sciences, vol. 2 (New York: Paragon House), pp. 299-320.
16. KUHN, T., 1970 (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
17. KUHN, T., 1991, The natural and the human sciences. In D. Hiley, J. Bohman and R. Shusterman (eds), The Interpretative Turn (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
18. LAKATOS, I. and MUSGRAVE, A. (eds), 1970, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
19. McGUCKIN, W., 1984, Scientists, society and the State (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press).
20. MEEK, R., 1976, Social Science and the Ignoble Savage (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
21. MIROWSKI, P., 1997, On playing the economics trump card in the philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science PSA 97 (Supplement to Vol. 64), S127-138.
22. MIROWSKI, P., 1999, Cyborg Agonistes. Social Studies of Science, 29, 685-718.
23. MIROWSKI, P., 2001, Machine Dreams (New York: Cambridge University Press).
24. MIROWSKI, P. and SENT, E.-M. (eds), 2002, Science Bought and Sold (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
25. MOTTERLINI, M. (ed.), 1999, For and Against Method (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
26. NELSON, R. (ed.), 1962, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
27. RAU, E., 1999, Combat Scientists: The Emergence of OR in the US in World War II. Ph.D. thesis, History of Science, University of Pennsylvania.
28. WEINBERG, S., 1998, The revolution that didn't happen. New York Review of Books, 8 October, 48-52.