Supercritical multitype branching processes: The ancestral types of typical individuals

Advances in Applied Probability

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1090-1110

  Georgii, Hans Otto ^a   Baake, Ellen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ancestral distribution; Empirical process; Kesten Stigum theorem; Large deviations; Multitype branching process; Size biased tree; Type history

Indexed keywords

CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; THEOREM PROVING;

ANCESTRAL DISTRIBUTION; MULTITYPE BRANCHING;

PROBABILITY;

EID: 0344514149     PISSN: 00018678     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1239/aap/1067436336     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ATHREYA, K. B. (1968). Some results on multitype continuous time Markov branching processes. Ann. Math. Statist. 39, 347-357.
2. ATHREYA, K. B. AND NEY, P. E. (1972). Branching Processes. Springer, New York.
3. CHAUVIN, B. ROUAULT, A. AND WAKOLBINGER, A. (1991). Growing conditioned trees. Stock. Process. Appl. 39, 117-130.
4. DEN HOLLANDER, F. (2000). Large Deviations (Fields Inst. Monogr. 14). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
5. DEUSCHEL, J. D. AND STROOCK, D. W. (1989). Large Deviations. Academic Press, Boston, MA. Reprinted: American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001.
6. DONSKER, M. D. AND VARADHAN, S. R. S. (1975). Asymptotic evaluation of certain Markov process expectations for large time, I. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 28, 1-47.
7. DONSKER, M. D. AND VARADHAN, S. R. S. (1983). Asymptotic evaluation of certain Markov process expectations for large time, IV. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 36, 183-212.
8. DURRETT, R. (2002). Probability Models for DNA Sequence Evolution. Springer, New York.
9. ETHIER, S. N. AND KURTZ, T. G. (1986). Markov Processes. Characterization and Convergence. John Wiley, New York.
10. GOROSTIZA, L. G., ROELLY, S. AND WAKOLBINGER, A. (1992). Persistence of critical multitype particle and measure branching processes, Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 92, 313-335.
11. HARRIS, T. E. (1963). The Theory of Branching Processes. Springer, Berlin. Reprinted: Dover, New York, 2002.
12. HERMISSON, J., REDNER, O., WAGNER, H. AND BAAKE, E. (2002). Mutation-selection balance: ancestry, load, and maximum principle. Theoret. Pop. Biol. 62, 9-46.
13. JAGERS, P. (1989). General branching processes as Markov fields. Stock, Process. Appl. 32, 183-242.
14. JAGERS, P. (1992). Stabilities and instabilities in population dynamics. J. Appl. Prob. 29, 770-780.
15. JAGERS, P. AND NERMAN, O. (1996). The asymptotic composition of supercritical multi-type branching populations. In Séminaire de Probabilités XXX (Lecture Notes Math. 1626), eds J. Azéma, M. Emery, and M. Yor, Springer, Berlin, pp. 40-54.
16. KESTEN, H. AND STIGUM, B. P. (1966). A limit theorem for multidimensional Galton-Watson processes. Ann. Math. Statist. 37, 1211-1233.
17. KINGMAN, J. F. C. (1982). The coalescent. Stoch. Process. Appl. 13, 235-248.
18. KINGMAN, J. F. C. (1982). On the genealogy of large populations. In Essays in Statistical Science (J. Appl. Prob. Spec. Vol. 19A), eds J. Gani and E. J. Hannan, Applied Probability Trust, Sheffield, pp. 27-43.
19. KURTZ, T., LYONS, R., PEMANTLE, R. AND PERES, Y. (1997). A conceptual proof of the Kesten-Stigum theorem for multi-type branching processes. In Classical and Modern Branching Processes, eds K. B. Athreya and P. Jagers, Springer, New York, pp. 181-185.
20. LYONS, R., PEMANTLE, R. AND PERES, Y. (1995). Conceptual proofs of L log L criteria for mean behaviour of branching processes. Ann. Prob. 23, 1125-1138.
21. MATTHES, K., KERSTAN, J. AND MECKE, J. (1978). Infinitely Divisible Point Processes. John Wiley, Chichester.
22. MOEHLE, M. (2000). Ancestral processes in population genetics - the coalescent. J. Theoret. Biol. 204, 629-638.
23. VARADHAN, S. R. S. (1988). Large deviations. In École d'Été de Probabilités de Saint-Flour XV-XVII, 1985 (Lecture Notes Math. 1362), ed. P. L. Hennequin, Springer, Berlin, pp. 1-49.